The case for expanding Alberta’s charter schools

Garnett Genuis
September 23, 2013
Unambiguous Success Held Back in Spite of the Evidence

The case for expanding Alberta’s charter schools

Garnett Genuis
September 23, 2013
Unambiguous Success Held Back in Spite of the Evidence
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

This past month, as over 600,000 Albertan school children returned to school, around 8,500 mostly Calgarian students were enrolled in charter schools. The latter number has increased little over the past several years, at a time when more and more countries around the world are seeing the benefits of such schools.

The basic concept is that the schools are publicly funded but operate independent of local school boards. They are able to take on a character defined in their charter that caters to children desiring a certain educational style.

Albertan charter schools specialise in music, serving gifted children, science, First Nations education, and single sex education, among other missions. Aside from their special character, these schools have additional flexibility in their staffing, how they use their funding, management, and curriculum.

The evidence that these schools are successful is becoming conclusive.  After reporting mixed results for U.S. Charter schools in 2009, Stanford University’s Center for Research on Educational Outcomes (CREDO) issued an update of their extensive studies, finding that “charter schools now advance the learning gains of their students more than traditional public schools in reading. [In math] learning gains are now similar to those of students in traditional public schools.”

Eric Hanushek, also from Stanford, recently published a study taking in test results of over one million students from 42 countries and found that in developed countries schools with better autonomy achieve better results for their students.

Here in Alberta, a study of scores in grades three, six, and nine published last month by the C.D. Howe Institute found a strong Charter School advantage, “The gap between charter schools and all other schools is large and consistent across all three grades …even with controls for observed student background, [it] would seem to merit further investigation.”

But other countries are already taking such cues and offering the charter choice to more children.  In the U.S., 41 States now have charter school legislation and the number of students attending the schools has risen 80 per cent to 2.3 million over four years.

British Education Secretary Michael Gove is pulling no punches as he converts more than half of the country’s schools to charter style Academies. When criticised by members of the education ‘establishment’ he responds, “there are still a tiny minority of teachers who see themselves as part of The Blob and have enlisted as Enemies Of Promise.”

In Sweden research shows that children do better and teachers are happier at Free Schools, which were first allowed in 1992 and nearly one-in-six students now attend. Even tiny New Zealand is getting in on the act. The first Partnership Schools, as their version is called, will open this February.

Alberta’s approach to educational choice is starting to look like Japan’s economy did in the 1990s. Once formidable and still amongst the leaders, but worryingly stagnant. The number of charter schools remains miniscule in the context of the wider education system, as does the number of children attending them.

Why does Alberta, generally known for its ethos of school choice, lag this global trend in spite of international and local evidence that more charter schools would improve children’s performance?

It can’t be that there is no demand; existing schools have very long waiting lists, reportedly 7,000 long in one case. The problem is one of supply, and specifically the process for opening the schools and attaining buildings to house them.

In order to start a charter school, the would-be operators must approach the local school board with their business plan, and ask the school board to achieve the same objectives. The school board can choose to take the ideas for itself, or reject them out of hand. As one commentator has put it, it would be like GM giving Ford its blueprints and only being given permission to build the new design if Ford didn’t want to appropriate them.

Then there is the supply of buildings, which is again at the behest of the local school board. Not only does GM have to submit its plans to Ford, but ask it for factory space. For these reasons, new and expanding charter schools are rarer than hot Februaries in Saskatchewan. These constraints have kept Charter Schools as bit players in spite of mounting local and international evidence, but more importantly parental preferences. It is high time the provincial government eased restrictions on Charter Schools and put parents back in the drivers’ seat.

~

Garnett Genuis is the Executive Director of Parents for Choice in Education. He is a long-time political activist who has been a Parliament Hill and Prime Minister’s Office Staffer, the coordinator of a political training program through the Canadian Centre for Policy Studies, an editor at an internet news company, and a candidate for provincial public office. Before joining PCE, he was the Executive Director of Responsible Electricity Transmission for Albertans. In his day job, Garnett is the Vice-President of Abingdon Research.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Thirteen Things That Can’t Be Said About Aboriginal Law And Policy In Canada

How do you make new laws and policies or reform old ones in a democracy? You talk openly about every aspect, carefully consider the pros and cons and the long-term implications, and strive to come up with solutions that are fair to everyone. That has been the ideal, anyway, in Canada since Confederation. So what happens when vast areas of law and policy cannot even be discussed any longer? Bruce Pardy lists the things that have become perilous to say regarding Indigenous issues – but that need to be said if Canada is to maintain a legal system that is fair to all Canadians.

Democratic socialism is the new communism, but what does that mean for the people old enough to remember living under communism?

New Communism, Old Fears

Supporting or working to bring about “democratic” socialism has become an alluring option for ever-more voters across North America. It is ascending on clouds of virtuous intentions, high hopes and utopian goals, backed by elaborate theories, with good doses of anger and envy adding punch. Yet it has all been tried before – and failed calamitously, an unmitigated horror ending in ruination. Luckily, people who have personally lived through it are still around to tell the tale. Through the eyes of one survivor of Eastern European communism, Doug Firby issues a stark reminder of what real oppression looks like and a plea to younger Canadians to resist the seductive call of socialism.

What would have happened if Canada rejected "coronapsychosis"?

Rejecting “Coronapsychosis” Could Be Good for Our Health

It will remain forever unknowable how Canada would have fared had our country not largely aped the “lockdown” model adopted by most of the advanced countries. But there is meaningful evidence for those who care and dare to look – and the implications aren’t pretty for our public health officials and their political acolytes. Brian Giesbrecht examined an obscure, far-off country run by an eccentric old man who decided to do the pandemic his own way – and may well have saved not only his nation’s economy but hundreds of his compatriots as well.

More from this author

A hopeful dispatch from the West Bank

This spring Canadian MP Garnett Genuis joined a Parliamentary tour of the West Bank hosted by the Palestinian Authority. As the only Conservative and unabashed Zionist on the bus, he sought to challenge both his own assumptions and the narrative presented by his hosts. Genuis saw a friendly, welcoming, and gracious people whose rich culture has been subverted by politics. And despite the latest bloody confrontations in Gaza, he also saw reason to hope for peace and a viable two-state solution, which is a fresh and encouraging perspective on a tragic conflict that will never be resolved as long as the narrative is dominated by victimization, blame, and failure to understand the experience of the other.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.