The Cult of the Victim Marches On

Paul Stanway
November 6, 2019
Veteran British journalist Suzanne Moore has been hounded from The Guardian for her supposed “transphobia.” Paul Stanway, reviewing Mark Milke’s The Victim Cult, discusses Milke’s argument that foolishly elevating claims of weakness, suffering and hurt to virtues compels us to focus on what divides rather than unites us.

The Cult of the Victim Marches On

Paul Stanway
November 6, 2019
Veteran British journalist Suzanne Moore has been hounded from The Guardian for her supposed “transphobia.” Paul Stanway, reviewing Mark Milke’s The Victim Cult, discusses Milke’s argument that foolishly elevating claims of weakness, suffering and hurt to virtues compels us to focus on what divides rather than unites us.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

In the wake of the recent unsatisfying federal election, it’s clearly an opportune time to ask why our national politics are so fractured: increasingly unable, it would seem, to find broad agreement on what Canada’s priorities ought to be, to identify what actions or projects would serve the national interest or even to express agreement that Canada is and has always been a worthwhile country. Maybe the problem is an antiquated electoral system. Maybe social media are “disrupting” public discussion and debate. Or maybe there’s also something more fundamental at work, and has been over a much longer period of time.

A fascinating new book from Canadian author and public policy analyst Mark Milke – The Victim Cult: How the culture of blame hurts everyone and wrecks civilizations looks at how grievances and a sense of victimhood, real and manufactured, influence the way we see the world. It’s particularly relevant in the current Canadian context, with a re-elected prime minister who appears to believe that we live in a society riddled with systemic injustice and oppression and burdened with a comprehensively shameful history that must be atoned for at every opportunity.

Calgarian Milke is best-known for his trenchant analyses of government fiscal policy and the seemingly infinite creativity of governments in mismanaging our tax dollars. His last book – Ralph vs. Rachel: A tale of two Alberta premiers – used statistics to demolish the “progressive” view of the Ralph Klein years in Alberta as a time of unremitting hardship for ordinary people under a mean-spirited, out-of-touch government (that nonetheless won four consecutive majorities).

As you would expect from Milke, the arguments in his new book are generously supported by statistics. But this time the subject encompasses a broad sweep of history, philosophy and even religious tradition – from Cain and Abel to Voltaire, the Rwandan genocide and Donald Trump – in an effort to show how the timeless themes of grievance and self-perceived victimhood damage people and societies. But whereas in the past these themes were often presented as cautionary tales, were typically frowned upon and were generally seen as ruinous when indulged, the post-modern left has elevated them to positive virtues, driving modern identity politics.

It’s a lot to chew on and Milke could easily have drowned in his own ambition, but as a writer he’s no slouch and manages to stick to the point and make his arguments convincingly in around 300 pages. He does it by focusing on familiar stories, some historical and some current, some you would expect to find here – university activism and the grievances of aboriginal Canadians – and some that look at familiar narratives in a different way.

Grievance Studies 101: From climate change to budget cuts to systemic oppression, Canadian students have endless opportunities to explore their victimhood.
Grievance Studies 101: From climate change to budget cuts to systemic oppression, Canadian students have endless opportunities to explore their victimhood.
Grievance Studies 101: From climate change to budget cuts to systemic oppression, Canadian students have endless opportunities to explore their victimhood.

Among the more recent examples, Milke examines the obsession of student activists with all manner of alleged “micro-aggressions” and “systemic” prejudices. At a time when actual discrimination in education is at an all-time low, the bar for such victimization must necessarily be set very low indeed, or the emphasis shifted to historical discrimination that is claimed to pose “an almost eternal barrier” to success at school and in life. In which case, asks Milke, how is it that those of Chinese, Japanese and South Asian ancestry, who were discriminated against over a broad span of time, are outperforming just about everyone else at university? They are doing so, indeed, to the point where some institutions (Harvard among them) limit entry by students of Asian ancestry.

Milke doesn’t claim there were no historic wrongs, nor that prejudice has been erased, but he argues that they are problems we have been largely successful at purging from our institutions and making unacceptable in society generally. It seems odd – “pernicious” might be a better word – that after much of the heavy lifting was done by previous generations we now congratulate ourselves on how much more enlightened we’ve become and offer abject apologies on behalf of our benighted ancestors. As genuine sufferers received their apologies one-by-one, the government was forced to hunt for ever-more dubious candidates – in some cases, simply inventing events to apologize for. The Trudeau government has embraced this view of open-ended victimhood as government policy – the prime minister’s repeated past antics in blackface notwithstanding.

Sometimes the victimhood is genuine: After the Canadian Pacific Railroad was complete, the Canadian government instituted a $50 head tax on Chinese immigrants in 1885. The Harper government apologized for this policy in 2006.
Sometimes the victimhood is genuine: After the Canadian Pacific Railroad was complete, the Canadian government instituted a $50 head tax on Chinese immigrants in 1885. The Harper government apologized for this policy in 2006.
Sometimes the suffering is genuine: After the Canadian Pacific Railroad was complete, the Canadian government instituted a $50 head tax on Chinese immigrants in 1885. The Harper government apologized for this policy in 2006.

The same obsession with righting perceived injustice is also paramount in the current Trudeau initiative which would give First Nations collective control over aboriginal children in need of care. Enabling those kids to live with or near blood relatives and to retain connections to their language and culture are clearly laudable goals. As Milke points out, however, prioritizing the collective rights of the band or tribe over the individual rights and needs of the child has already had tragic consequences in both the U.S. and Canada. He cites the case of Baby Veronica in South Carolina, whose 1.2 per cent Cherokee heritage resulted in a multi-year court battle and separation from her non-native adoptive parents. Closer to home he notes the bureaucratic nightmare that resulted in the 2014 death of a four-year-old Alberta toddler named Serenity.

The consequences of prioritizing collective over individual right: Advocates for toddler Serenity demand charges against her guardians.

The countless failures and shortcomings of Canadian policy regarding First Nations are not Milke’s focus, but he rightly suggests that embracing victimhood is an unlikely way to escape the awful trap that successive Canadian governments – sometimes with the best of intentions, and often with the collusion of reserve governments – have constructed for aboriginal people. The Victim Cult begins with a foreword from B.C. MLA and former Haisla Nation chief councillor Ellis Ross, making just that point: “In reading this book, I saw what I had learned put into print for the first time: The false narratives or ideologies that convince people that they are doomed to fail and that someone else or something else is to blame. There is plenty of blame to go around, but I prefer finding solutions.”

Those false narratives and ideologies are not new. They have a long history, and Milke spends some time looking at how they have developed through the millennia and the role the victimhood cult played in some of the worst tragedies of the 20th century: Nazi Germany, Palestine, and Rwanda.

The notion that public support for the Nazis flowed directly from grievances felt in Germany as a result of unjust post-First World War reparations imposed by the victors will be familiar to many readers. Iconic economist John Maynard Keynes was one early supporter of this view, and it remains widespread today. The reality, as Milke details, is that the Nazi movement was an easily conceivable result of a German victim culture two centuries in the making. It was supported by generations of German philosophers, artists, composers, politicians, academics and students, with generous assists from Voltaire and other notables.

Contrary to Keynes’ view, the numbers suggest post-First World War reparations were not unjust or unbearable. But the entrenched belief among many Germans that they were routinely victimized by their Jewish fellow citizens, their European neighbours, and a liberal world order found an outlet in National Socialism and a voice in Adolf Hitler. The result was a Second World War and many millions more actual victims – a huge number of Germans among them.

Hitler’s Nazi movement emerged from a centuries’ old victim culture in Germany.

Milke makes a similar case for the ongoing Palestinian tragedy: that the victimhood narrative embraced by the Palestinian leadership, most members of the UN, “progressive” opinion and many in the news media has become the cause of most current Palestinian suffering and the chief impediment to peace. He describes the late PLO chairman Yasser Arafat’s enchantment with his worldwide celebrity status as spokesman for Palestinian victimhood growing to the point where Arafat turned down any and all offers of a settlement with Israel.

Most famously, as Milke writes, in 2000 U.S. President Bill Clinton brokered a deal that would have given the Palestinians “97 per cent of the West Bank, all of Gaza, its capital in East Jerusalem, and control of the Temple Mount and of the Christian and Muslim quarters in the old city.” In effect Arafat was being offered the Palestinian state his people had long sought, backed by massive international aid to support it. As Clinton later recounted, the deal was widely supported by Arab leaders, by “most of the young people on Arafat’s team,” and by a majority of the international community.

Yet Arafat turned down the deal, later explaining that, “Peaceful settlement can have only one meaning – surrender.” Almost two decades later there has been no “surrender” and the chances for a peaceful settlement with Israel are more remote than ever. Palestinian victimhood, however, has undergone a significant revival in recent years, as has open anti-Semitism, becoming a popular “cause” on university campuses and among self-proclaimed progressives throughout the Western democracies. 

Despite an excellent offer from Israel, PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat sacrificed his people’s peace and security in favour of perpetual victim status.

Which brings Milke to Donald Trump. Thankfully he doesn’t spend much time on the U.S. President’s self-declared victim status – everybody’s out to get him. But it is worth making the point that Trump understood the phenomenon and its hold on many working Americans, particularly after the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent Great Recession. They viewed themselves as marginalized and forgotten, the American Dream out of reach. As a billionaire developer and former reality TV star, Trump was hardly a member of that group but, as Milke rightly says, he understood the victim Zeitgeist and rode it all the way to the White House.  

There’s a lot more to this complex but readable book. Milke’s background in political philosophy and real-world public policy allows him to weave together elements from the key disciplines to explain what we have come to think of as a singularly modern phenomenon – the victim cult – but which has deep roots in human development and has time and again proven toxic to societies ancient and modern.

That seems a particularly timely reminder in the wake of the recent divisive election following four years of relentless identity politics under Justin Trudeau’s leadership – with four more years in the offing. This is a huge and diverse country and there are votes to be had in mining the grievances and historic hurts that divide us.

“The biggest witch hunt in history:” Trump declares himself the ultimate victim time and again.

But, as Milke points out, there’s a price to be paid when we focus on what divides us rather than what unites us, and our current political disunity may be only the first installment. As an alternative, Milke recommends “a statute of limitations against the past.” Not a denial of past wrongs or a refusal to reconcile our historical differences, but a sense of perspective: a recognition that our history delivered more successes than failures, and that our institutions and traditions provide the best foundation for success in the future. Milke’s proposition should naturally recommend itself to conservatives.

Paul Stanway is a veteran Canadian journalist who lives in Calgary.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Our Man in Stepanakert

The “Great Game” was a series of military and political manoeuvres and confrontations during the 19th and 20th centuries between Imperial Britain and Tsarist Russia over control of central Eurasia. Today that game continues, but with regional power Turkey having replaced Britain. A bloody war late last year between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the ancient battleground of Nagorno-Karabakh represents the latest episode of this ongoing powerplay. Arriving just weeks after the fighting ended, Fin dePencier offers an eyewitness account of the war’s chaotic aftermath, its terrible human cost and the role played by Canadian volunteers in helping Armenia recover from its devastating loss.

How Climate, Covid-19 and the Great Reset Are Taking Us Back to the Middle Ages

The rise of the educated middle class over the past 250 years is one of the great triumphs of Western civilization. But just as the middle class became ascendant, the intellectual left began figuring out how to tear it back down, an impulse that has since spread to virtually every privileged element in society. The elite’s war on the middle’s prosperity, social mobility and freedom has been accelerating. Where might it take us? Author David Solway is not alone in thinking it won’t end until we are reduced to a new serfdom that, though partially masked by the peons’ access to 21st century gadgetry and other technology, will be very similar in social structure and oppressiveness to the Middle Ages.

From Russia with a Psychology Lesson

We have fallen a long way since the day, seemingly lifetimes ago, when “The End of History” and the global triumph of liberal democracy were considered plausible political predictions. Today a bellicose Russia is still tormenting its neighbours, China is on a global rampage and democracy itself is looking beaten-up. Why is this happening? Maria Krylova believes that totalitarianism derives much of its momentum and longevity from the human psyche itself. In this essay drawing on her understanding of Russian history and literature, her formal education and her burning belief in freedom, the adoptive Canadian issues an eloquent warning that no society is truly immune.

More from this author

Gardeners versus designers; a paradigm to understand Canada's political divide.

How does your Canada grow? A new look at the political divide

Left versus right. Urban versus rural. Baby boomer versus millennial. Us versus them. There’s no shortage of division in society these days. As we all retreat into our separate corners, Brian Lee Crowley, head of the Ottawa-based Macdonald-Laurier Institute, offers up a brand new pair of opposing, society-defining categories: gardeners versus designers. In his review of Crowley’s latest book, veteran journalist Paul Stanway points out what works and what doesn’t with this novel take on the eternal political struggle of ideas. And how it just might decide the next federal election.

A Political Giant Passes the Torch

The expression “he’s earned his retirement” could have been written for Preston Manning. The party-founding Canadian political original, onetime Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, prolific author and tireless public affairs commentator has accomplished enough for any five regular folks. He’s nearly 78, has grandchildren, a ranch and loves to ride horses. But with distant echoes of the early Roman republican Cincinnatus or the late Roman emperor Diocletian, crises of the state and confusion among the citizenry press upon him. So Manning finds himself doing double-duty as the most politically experienced member of Alberta’s Fair Deal Panel and, today in Toronto, launching a nationwide tour to promote his new book aimed at the current problems of democracy and conservatism in Canada. Paul Stanway reviews.

But for a ‘Basic Dictatorship’

When Justin Trudeau pined for autocracy in 2013 he was thinking of China and climate change. He has a far more pressing reason to wish for it today, writes Paul Stanway, as the pesky rule of law keeps interfering with his government’s best-laid plans in the SNC-Lavalin affair. The distinctly unhelpful election-year allegation is that first they bent the rule to spare the Montreal firm prosecution for corruption; when that failed they tried to break it. But former Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould got in the way, and another Quebec Liberal scandale was born.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.