The Economics of Green Energy Ideology

Gwyn Morgan
October 24, 2020
Solar panels filling fields in cloudy northern countries. Wind turbines manufactured for export by the world’s largest builder of coal-fired power and worst emitter of greenhouse gases. Governments deliberately demolishing their country’s most valuable industry. It is increasingly clear that so-called green energy isn’t just another instance of youthful idealism going a little too far, much less a practical way to a clean future, but a nasty utopian ideology bent on impoverishing entire countries. Gwyn Morgan examines a slice of this destructive landscape and warns of the severe risk to Canada’s economic well-being.

The Economics of Green Energy Ideology

Gwyn Morgan
October 24, 2020
Solar panels filling fields in cloudy northern countries. Wind turbines manufactured for export by the world’s largest builder of coal-fired power and worst emitter of greenhouse gases. Governments deliberately demolishing their country’s most valuable industry. It is increasingly clear that so-called green energy isn’t just another instance of youthful idealism going a little too far, much less a practical way to a clean future, but a nasty utopian ideology bent on impoverishing entire countries. Gwyn Morgan examines a slice of this destructive landscape and warns of the severe risk to Canada’s economic well-being.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

Wildfires along the U.S. Pacific Coast, two simultaneous hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, melting glaciers and peat-bog fires in Canada, and an unusually hot summer in Europe together have raised global warming fears to frenzied proportions. Environmentalists are urging political leaders to legislate the rapid phase-out of fossil fuels. The most extreme call for action came from the future King of England, Prince Charles, who urged a “warlike footing” that would include creation of a centralized global authority to save the planet from catastrophic climate change. Just how such an unelected regime would exert power over the Earth’s 7.8 billion inhabitants wasn’t made clear.

The economics of green energy by c2c journal
economics of green energy c2c journal prince charles
A call to “war”: In the wake of some wild weather, Prince Charles advocates for global war-like measures to combat the changes.

The California and Oregon wildfires turned into an election issue, with Democratic Presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden pointing to President Donald Trump’s pro-oil-industry policies as a cause. In fact, American greenhouse gas emissions have fallen by more than 14 percent since 2005, suggesting there’s very little connection between one country’s carbon dioxide emissions and global warming. Meanwhile, led by China and India, Asian emissions have doubled over the past decade and continue to grow. Overall, less than one-third of global emissions come from Western developed countries. China, India, Vietnam, South Africa, South Korea, the Philippines and Japan, all signatories to the Paris Climate Accord, are in various stages of constructing a mind-bending total of 1,800 coal-fired power plants.

The Economics of Green Energy by C2C Journal - Joe Biden turns a blind eye to real global emissions problems in china
Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden turns a blind eye to the real global emissions problem – China and its Communist dictatorship.

And that brings us to Canada. If our country were to disappear from the face of the Earth, those new plants would replace our 1.6 percent of global emissions in just a few months. Despite that reality, the Trudeau government is actually accelerating its ideologically driven program to replace fossil fuels with so-called green energy – mainly wind and solar. The government’s Throne Speech in late September virtually ignored the economic destitution its anti-oil policies have wrought in Alberta. Even the potential global market access provided through the expansion of the Trans Mountain Pipeline that is now underway was couched in terms of providing a bridge to a fossil-fuel-free paradise. 

The green energy fixation was also the focus of the Globe and Mail’s September 26 “Climate Issue”.

Columnist David Berman asserted that the costs of wind and solar power have “become attractive next to fossil fuels generating assets, particularly coal.” As evidence, he cited Tucson Electric Power’s phase-out of its coal-fired electricity generation. This is misleading.

The Economics of Green Energy by C2C Journal - construction equipment
The Economics of Green Energy by C2C Journal - Protest by environmentalists
Pipelines and hydro dams are both on environmentalists’ target lists, yet hydro gets counted under “renewable” energy when it suits them.

Data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration shows that coal-fired plants are indeed being phased out – but their output is being replaced by natural gas. In fact, wind and solar provide less than 1 percent of Arizona’s electricity requirements. The technical revolution in natural gas production of the past dozen or so years (popularly summed up as “shale gas” and “fracking”) has kept gas prices down even as production has soared.

Fellow Globe and Mail columnist Eric Reguly stated that Canada’s share of renewables – i.e., hydro, wind, biomass, solar and ethanol – is above the average for OECD countries. But as is often the case with selective-fact statements from green power advocates, Reguly failed to mention that the large majority of that comes from hydro power. Hydro power is in fact one of the oldest ways to generate electricity and has nothing at all to do with the green energy “revolution”. Further, the dams and reservoirs associated with large-scale hydropower are hated by most environmentalists, who are doing all they can to prevent construction of new dams and even to have existing dams dismantled. Wind and solar, meanwhile, made up just 2.3 percent of Canada’s electricity supply in 2019.

Vision for Canada? In Germany, thousands of these monsters clutter the landscape while generating immaterial “green” energy.

Looking globally, the widely respected BP World Energy Outlook 2019 shows that, despite many hundreds of billions of dollars invested, wind and solar contributed the same 2 percent of world energy supplies last year while the contribution of fossil fuels had actually increased to 84 percent. Germans have come to know and rue the hazards of pursuing a green power utopia all-too well. A decade-long attempt to replace coal and nuclear with wind and solar sent electricity costs soaring to the second-highest in the European Union. Despite hundreds of billions of euros invested, the basic unreliability of wind and solar necessitated Germany rehabilitating coal-fired power plants. In an ironic twist, the coal is sourced from the U.S., made readily available by the aforementioned conversion of America’s power generation to natural gas. 

In Ontario, the previous Liberal government led by former Premier Dalton McGuinty implemented a similar green power plan to that of Germany, with equally disastrous results. Coal-fired power plants were shuttered and planned expansion of nuclear plants cancelled. The government signed 25-year locked-in windmill and solar contracts at several times existing electricity rates. Electricity prices more than doubled, taking Ontario from one of North America’s lowest-cost power jurisdictions to among the highest, more than twice as high as other provinces. As beleaguered homeowners struggled to pay their electricity bills, manufacturers decamped to low-cost U.S. states like Georgia and the Carolinas. Caterpillar, United Steel, Heinz, General Motors, Navistar, Kellogg’s, John Deere, Kraft Foods, Unilever and Bacardi’s closed some or all of their Ontario plants. Ontario’s deep economic wound was entirely self-inflicted.

The Economics of Green Energy by C2C Journal
The Economics of Green Energy by C2C Journal
Just two of many big business closures after Ontario’s bad green energy policy (Kellogg’s plant in London, Ontario and abandoned Unilever soap factory in Toronto below). Above, Dalton McGuinty, the former Liberal premier whose policies led to this self-inflicted wound.

Then there’s the impact on the land. The more than 8,000 wind turbines Ontario had built each required an average of 3 acres of space. Many are near bird habitats, causing locals to label them “bird blenders”. Wind power’s numerous other environmental shortcomings have lately been coming to light. The massive turbine blades only last so long and, it turns out, cannot be recycled. They will need to be placed in landfills. The foundations required to keep the windmills standing in the face of nature’s forces consume enormous volumes of concrete. The generators inside the pods use rare-earth metals mined in part by African child labour. And in another ironic twist, China, the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, produces most of the wind turbines that Western countries are spending billions on in pursuit of their save-the-world-through-green-power fantasy.

Not so benign: Solar panels are “off” more than “on” while ruining valuable landscapes.

Even all this is only part of the story. Because – surprise – the wind blows irregularly, because solar panels are useless during Ontario’s long dark winter nights, and because there is no way to efficiently store electricity, several new natural gas-fired power plants were needed to back up those unreliable wind and solar facilities. The inefficient deployment of capital and the need to pay those providers for standing by pushed Ontario’s power prices even higher. The only winners from this made-in-Ontario fiasco were the so-called “green-preneurs” who became very wealthy from those locked-in power contracts.

Our eco-friendly future? Mass graves for wind blades. (Source: Benjamin Rasmussen / Getty Images)

The moral of this sad story is that the Trudeau Liberals’ plans to replace fossil fuels with wind and solar are technically impossible and economically disastrous. Moreover, phasing out the oilsands would simply hand even more of the global crude oil market to such sterling global citizens as Russia and Iran, while throwing more than 1 million Canadians out of work and destroying the country’s largest source of wealth generation and export revenues. All at a time when that wealth generation is needed more than ever.

Trying to solve any problem with a solution that defies the laws of physics is bound to fail. What can Canada actually do to help reduce global emissions and help the economy? That will be the subject of my next column.

Gwyn Morgan is the retired founding CEO of EnCana Corp., formerly Canada’s largest producer of natural gas.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Fake News Fake-Out

The news business is at its least reliable when reporting on itself. Coverage of a media company’s own financial results, for example, is inevitably glowing and upbeat, whatever the actual figures might say. The same thing holds for concerns over “fake news”. Seizing on recent panic about the spread of misinformation, and thanks to a generous federal grant, Canada’s legacy newspapers have devised their own system for identifying fake news. But as Peter Shawn Taylor discovers, the criteria strangely celebrate their own product at the expense of their many online competitors. And much of it contradicts the basic rules of good journalism.

Hating Jordan Peterson

Who kicks a person when they’re down? Who dresses up their own resentment, spite or ideological fervour as analysis? One doesn’t need to agree with Jordan Peterson’s every idea to regard his recent comeback from the brink of death, destruction and oblivion as welcome, commendable and inspiring. At least worth a shred of empathy. But not from the more doctrinaire of his woke Left critics. As Janice Fiamengo finds, they aren’t just revelling in the popular author’s misfortune but are committing what they normally consider an unforgivable sin: blaming the victim.

George Orwell on the Myanmar Coup

“The whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought”, George Orwell wrote in his famous novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. “In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.” Orwell understood that whoever controls language controls political thought. And such an insight is as applicable to Myanmar in 2021 as it was to Oceania in 1984. Using Orwell as his guide, and relying on his extensive personal contacts throughout the country, C2C Journal associate editor Patrick Keeney takes a close look at reality and meaning in the recent coup in Myanmar.

More from this author


Pandemic Follies: The Biggest Government Policy Mistakes

Canada’s economy was supposed to have been cruising along the road to recovery by late last year. Instead, the nation is once again shedding jobs, unemployment is high, companies continue to shrink or go under, entire industries are threatened and growth is almost nowhere to be seen. So why are governments seemingly doing everything in their power not only to hold back recovery but destroy much of what remains? Gwyn Morgan assesses several key areas of our nation’s battered economy and reviews the central role played by poorly thought-out, unneeded and avoidable government policies in each one.

A Practical Way for Canada to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Carbon dioxide emissions are a globe-girdling phenomenon driven by industrialization, and atmospheric gases obviously don’t care about national boundaries. So it’s distinctly weird that some left-leaning governments, Canada’s Liberals among them, insist that recognized emissions reductions must take place right here at home! Isn’t the goal “saving the planet”? In fact Canada has a clean-burning energy resource that’s voluminously abundant and economically accessible with current technology – and which the world can’t get enough of. As Gwyn Morgan writes, jobs, wealth-creation, tax-revenue and environmental improvement on a global scale all await, if only governments dropped their ideological blinkers.

The future of Alberta, and Canada for that matter, is at the brink. Can we walk it back?

Stepping Back from the Brink – Maybe

“You don’t know what you’ve got ’till it’s gone” was penned long ago as an environmentalist, anti-establishment lament. These days, the environmentalists are the establishment, industry is the underdog, and the federal Liberals have come close to destroying the nation’s foremost generator of wealth and tax revenues. Some recent pronouncements by certain federal ministers, however, have Gwyn Morgan seeing glimmerings of reason, or at least pragmatism. If they do suspend their scorched-earth campaign against oil and gas, though, it won’t be for any love of the resource sector, let alone of Alberta. It will simply be because they need the money desperately. If that’s what it takes, writes Morgan, so be it.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.