Climate Politics

Hara-Kiri Trudeau Style

Gwyn Morgan
July 5, 2023
When does a once-lofty ideal that some time ago degenerated into blind dogma collapse further into suicide cult? Right about now, when it comes to “save the planet” by forcing Canada to “net zero.” Gwyn Morgan charts the Trudeau government’s further ratcheting up of taxes and regulatory burdens on Canada’s hard-pressed consumers, businesses and the energy sector, all in the name of fighting climate change to which Canada’s contribution is barely a rounding error – while the big emitters like China get a free pass from the Trudeau government itself.
Climate Politics

Hara-Kiri Trudeau Style

Gwyn Morgan
July 5, 2023
When does a once-lofty ideal that some time ago degenerated into blind dogma collapse further into suicide cult? Right about now, when it comes to “save the planet” by forcing Canada to “net zero.” Gwyn Morgan charts the Trudeau government’s further ratcheting up of taxes and regulatory burdens on Canada’s hard-pressed consumers, businesses and the energy sector, all in the name of fighting climate change to which Canada’s contribution is barely a rounding error – while the big emitters like China get a free pass from the Trudeau government itself.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Wildfires in Canada and unseasonably high temperatures in parts of Europe are being blamed on climate change, further escalating the frenzied sense of urgency propounded by governments, activist groups and the mainstream media to “do something” about carbon emissions. In Canada, it seems no volume of emissions is too small to worry about. B.C. taxpayers, for example, will be paying an estimated $25 million to connect cruise ships docking in Victoria to electric shore power so the ships’ diesel generators can be shut down. This is surely establishing a world record in the cost per unit of avoided emissions.

No amount of emissions too small to tax-and-spend into submission: The Justin Trudeau government is continuing to increase the federal carbon tax, is adding costly new fuel standards and is attempting to bring about “net zero” emissions in the vehicle fleet and power generation. Canada’s combined fuel taxes will soon be nearly six times as high as those in the U.S., our main economic competitor. (Sources of photos: (top) The Canadian Press/Darren Calabrese; (bottom left) Shutterstock; (bottom right) The Canadian Press/Chris Young)

Speaking of world records, our country is on also on-track to establish a much larger cost record on emissions reductions – spanning the entire nation – through a combination of ever-rising carbon taxes on motor fuel and deliberate debilitation of the oil and natural gas industry, which contributes Canada’s largest share of both GDP and export revenue.

Motorists in B.C., Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec are already paying average federal and provincial gasoline and diesel fuel taxes of 15.4 cents/litre plus carbon taxes of 14 cents for a total of 29.4 cents/litre (Alberta’s government is currently foregoing the provincial tax component in an effort to help consumers). The federal carbon tax is scheduled to increase to 37 cents/litre by 2030, taking average gasoline taxes to 52.4 cents/litre.

But that’s not enough for Trudeau-ite zealots. The feds are also imposing a scheme called the “clean fuel standard,” which came into force on Canada Day requiring providers of motor fuels to progressively reduce the “carbon intensity” of their products. Environment and Climate Change Canada says the clean fuel standard will increase gasoline costs by 17 cents/litre and diesel fuel by 16 cents/litre.

Six provinces – the four Atlantic provinces, joined by Saskatchewan and, just last week, Alberta – have banded together at the 11th hour to push back against the long-planned scheme. “Canadians are already struggling with high inflation,” wrote Rebecca Schulz, Alberta’s Minister of Environment and Protected Areas, in a letter to federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault on June 29. “Adding fuel to the fire by hiking the cost of gasoline and diesel will be devastating.” While these six provinces are to be applauded, they may not get far. Guilbeault is a hardcore ideological green zealot and unlikely to be moved by questions of practicality and economics. If the provinces try the legal route, they’ll be up against a Supreme Court of Canada that usually sides with the federal government against the provinces in jurisdictional disputes. Lastly, the Atlantic provinces are perennially vulnerable to being bought off or bullied by Ottawa, which would fracture the current alliance.

“Canadians are already struggling with high inflation…hiking the cost of gasoline and diesel will be devastating,” wrote Alberta’s Minister of Environment and Protected Areas Rebecca Schulz (top) in a letter to Ottawa last week regarding the new “Clean Fuel Standard,” a position shared by five other provinces. The six provinces are almost certain to be snubbed by federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault (bottom). (Sources of photos: (top) Alberta Newsroom, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0; (bottom) UN Biodiversity, licensed under CC BY 2.0)

Adding all the aforementioned taxes together means that motorists in provinces making up 80 percent of Canada’s population will be paying average motor fuel taxes, plus artificially raised costs, of 69.4 cents/liter by 2030. In the U.S., by contrast, total federal and state gasoline taxes average just 44.6 cents per U.S. gallon (about 11.7 cents per litre), with absolutely no sign of increasing. Looking province-by-province, this item from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation notes that the costs will be highly uneven geographically, ranging from “just” $384 per average household annually in B.C. and $436 in Quebec all the way to $1,157 in Alberta.

Not surprisingly, the Parliamentary Budget Officer has concluded that these rising motor fuel taxes are “broadly regressive,” meaning that the economic impact will fall disproportionately on lower-income people already struggling to pay the rising cost of groceries and other necessities. His report estimates that lower-income people will be paying 0.6 percent of their annual income just on these increases in fuel taxes. And the cost of all their necessities will, in turn, be driven even higher by carbon taxes levied on the fuels used in their production and delivery. How ironic that a self-described “progressive” Liberal government kept in power by the deeply socialist NDP – both of which are allegedly dedicated to protecting the poor – is fighting a war on carbon emissions on the backs of those who can least afford it.

“Broadly regressive”: Costs of the so-called “second tax carbon” will average from $384 to $1,157 per household annually. Lower-income Canadians will be hardest-hit. (Source of table: Canadian Taxpayers Federation)

And speaking of people who can least afford the carbon taxes, a just-published study from the Canadian Energy Centre, entitled How will Atlantic Canada fare under the carbon tax? found that the two most populous Maritime provinces will be the hardest hit. Nova Scotia’s reliance on power generated from coal (which is even more heavily targeted by carbon taxes than oil and natural gas) will see its costs to produce electricity rising by an estimated 109 percent, while power production costs in New Brunswick will rise by 42 percent.

That’s the direct impact on individual Canadians. What about damage to the businesses that employ them? Members of the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) struggling to recover from the pandemic now face bankruptcy due to the year-end deadline to pay back Canada Emergency Business Account loans. And by “members,” we’re not talking about a few dozen or few hundred businesses – which would be bad enough. The CFIB estimates that a staggering 250,000 Canadian small businesses are at risk of failure in our post-Covid-19 era of alleged growth and recovery. Ironically, escalating federal fuel taxes imposed by the same government they are required to repay are raising virtually all of their operating costs at a time when many teeter on the brink of bankruptcy.

Then there’s the impact on our exporters. Cross-border trade with the U.S. accounts for the lion’s share of our exports. Business investment per worker is an important predictor of economic prosperity and competitiveness. A just-published study by the Fraser Institute found that Canadian business investment per worker was $14,687 in 2021 compared with $26,751 in the U.S. Rising carbon taxes are certain to widen that gap, driving more Canadian factories south of the border – and further driving down our living standards.

Canadian business investment per worker is already barely half that in the U.S. As carbon taxes and burdensome regulations on businesses and industries continue to grow in Canada, this gap will surely widen. (Source of graph: Comparing Business Investment per Worker in Canada and the United States, 2002–2021, by Fraser Institute)

But will all this economic sacrifice make any difference whatsoever to climate change? Hardly. First, Canada accounts for only 1.6 percent of global carbon emissions. Of that, cars and trucks account for about one-eighth, or just 0.2 percent. Meanwhile, Canada imports most of its manufactured goods (including many of the components and equipment needed to generate our supposedly “green” wind and solar energy) from China, a country that generates by far the largest share – 27 percent – of global carbon emissions.

Calculations that I’ve performed using data from the Government of Canada’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions website show that, if all our gasoline and diesel-powered cars and trucks were taken off the road for one year, the total emissions avoided would offset China’s emissions for just 58 hours. But where are the calls for a carbon-intensity tax on Chinese imports?

Calculations performed by the author using Government of Canada data. Where, he wonders, are the calls for a carbon-intensity tax on Chinese imports? Instead, the Trudeau government makes excuses for China. (Source of graphic: C2C Journal)

Second, if it’s wildfires you are worried about, then economy-ruining carbon taxes and fuel standards are the worst place to start addressing them. For one thing, it is becoming increasingly evident that a large number of this year’s fires were caused by human sources of ignition. Vancouver Island, for example, suffered an unusually high total of 46 wildfires to the end of June, far above its long-term average of two. It was just revealed last week that all 46 of these fires – 100 percent – were set by people. It will be fascinating if we can ever find out how many of those 46 events were deliberate. It’s possible that the increasingly hyped fears of climate change, rather than climate change itself, are causing fires.

Equally if not more important, the scientific evidence is overwhelming that wildfires both in Canada and worldwide are actually in a multi-decade-long period of decline in number and total area burnt per year. Even the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the source of “official” science for the climate-obsessed, declines to attribute wildfire patterns to rising greenhouse gas emissions. This recent article in the Financial Post by statistical expert Ross McKitrick has much more on these points.

Don’t blame climate change: It was recently learned that all 46 wildfires to hit Vancouver Island so far this year were ignited by people; meanwhile, the scientific evidence is clear that wildfires globally are becoming fewer in number and burning a smaller total area. Pictured is the recent Cameron Bluffs wildfire on Vancouver Island. (Source of photo: B.C. Wildfire Service)

How ironic that a nation with one of the world’s greatest endowments of energy resources – including natural gas that, if exported, could help other countries reduce their carbon emissions – deliberately drives the costs of energy to among the world’s highest. It brings to mind the ancient Japanese practice of Hara-Kiri, meaning “disembowelment with honour.” The ritual suicide of Hara-Kiri was a voluntary choice. The difference is, Canadians have no choice in the Trudeau government’s disembowelment of the country’s economic well-being.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who was a director of five global corporations.

Depicted as main image is Bubbly Self Destruction, a painting by Kelly Butz.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

They Would Call Me a “Denier” – Let Me Explain what I Believe about Residential Schools in Canada

In our largely “post-truth” society, the validity of a given statement is increasingly assessed based on who is making it. There are even those who believe that only some should be allowed to say certain things – while others should be scorned or even imprisoned for uttering the same words. This increasingly describes the discursive landscape concerning Canada’s Indian Residential Schools and whether Indigenous children disappeared from and/or were murdered there. Drawing on his lived experience as a onetime residential school employee, on his long academic record and, not least, on his personal courage in the face of those who wish to criminalize “denialism”, Rodney Clifton presents a humbly argued plea for Canadians to judge their country’s residential school record according to the truth – the actual, factual truth.

One Job We Can’t Let AI Replace: Philosopher. Rethinking the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

We stand on the precipice of a new technological age. Artificial intelligence promises (or threatens) to upend every aspect of modern life – from employment to entertainment, manufacturing to warfare – as well as the very relationship between humanity and the machinery it creates. Given AI’s potentially cataclysmic consequences, D.C.C. Randell argues it is imperative that we set not merely regulatory and technical boundaries around its development, but ethical ones as well. Combining the warnings of current AI experts with the wisdom of philosophers and moralists from past ages, Randell explains the dangers posed by allowing the AI revolution to continue unfettered and proposes steps to bring it in line.

Arresting Developments: The Persecution of David Menzies and the Fight for Media Freedom in Canada

The sight of a journalist getting roughed up and hustled off by police as he tries to ask a question of a public figure in a public place is one you might expect to witness in a banana republic or present-day Russia. But it has happened four times in Canada just this year to veteran journalist David Menzies of Rebel News. Menzies is an old-fashioned street journalist – right down to his trademark fedora – asking straight questions and digging for the truth no matter the consequences. In this instalment of C2C’s Courageous Canadians series, Associate Editor Brock Eldon sits down with Menzies to talk about his run-ins with the law, his determination to publish without fear or favour, and the state of Canadian journalism.

More from this author

The Pawns Push Back against the Trudeau Government’s Electric Vehicle Diktats

Perhaps there is a certain twisted logic to the woke left’s attempt to convince schoolchildren that math is racist and that 2 plus 2 might well equal 5. For this may be the only way to get the “math” surrounding the Justin Trudeau government’s push to force Canadians into buying only electric vehicles as of 2035 to work in any way at all. Gwyn Morgan reviews the actual math of key elements of the EV transition scheme – the electric power needs, the subsidized purchases, the tax credits, the vast number of required charging stations, the maintenance of roads – and finds both the costs and the implementation obstacles to be a mixture of steep, dubious and prohibitive. So much so, Morgan concludes, as to cast the entire EV transition in doubt.

A Wealth-Creating Way of Reducing Global CO2 Emissions

It is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s contention there’s no “business case” for exporting Canada’s abundant, inexpensively produced natural gas as LNG. But Canadians might do well to politely decline management consulting advice from a former substitute drama teacher who was born into wealth and has never had to meet a payroll, balance a budget or make a sale. Bluntly stated, someone who has shown no evidence of being able to run the proverbial lemonade stand. And one whose real agenda, the evidence shows, is to strangle the nation’s most productive and wealth-generating industry. With the first LNG ship finally expected to dock at Kitimat, B.C. over the next year and load Canada’s first-ever LNG export cargo, Gwyn Morgan lays out the business and environmental cases for ramping up our LNG exports – and having them count towards Canada’s greenhouse gas reduction targets.

The Worrisome Wave of Politicized Prosecutions

Shaping criminal charges, bail decisions or prison sentences around an accused person’s political or religious beliefs is utterly odious – a hallmark of tinpot tyrannies and totalitarian hellholes. Such practices have no place in any constitutional nation, let alone a mature democracy that presents itself as a model to the world. But that is increasingly the situation in Canada, writes Gwyn Morgan. Comparing the treatment of protesters accused of minor infractions to those of incorrigible criminals who maim and kill, Morgan finds a yawning mismatch that suggests political motivations are increasingly a factor in today’s criminal justice system.

Share This Story

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.