Culture

In Lieu of Charity, Please Send Flowers

Lynne Cohen
August 24, 2023
They have inspired artists and poets since the invention of paints and writing. They’ve adorned funerals, graveyards and other mourning sites for millennia – since the literal dawn of humanity. They say “I love you” like few other things. Why, then, have so many funerals and other rituals for the deceased become flower-free zones, with mourners instead pressured to send money to specified charities? Lynne Cohen explores the vexing “In Lieu of Flowers” phenomenon, provides her unique take on what makes it pernicious, and offers a ringing paean to the appropriateness, usefulness and morality of always sending flowers.
Culture

In Lieu of Charity, Please Send Flowers

Lynne Cohen
August 24, 2023
They have inspired artists and poets since the invention of paints and writing. They’ve adorned funerals, graveyards and other mourning sites for millennia – since the literal dawn of humanity. They say “I love you” like few other things. Why, then, have so many funerals and other rituals for the deceased become flower-free zones, with mourners instead pressured to send money to specified charities? Lynne Cohen explores the vexing “In Lieu of Flowers” phenomenon, provides her unique take on what makes it pernicious, and offers a ringing paean to the appropriateness, usefulness and morality of always sending flowers.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

In lieu of charity, please support your local businesses and send flowers.

This idea came to me after reading for possibly the 5,000th time, “In lieu of flowers, please send donations to [a particular charity].” You’re probably thinking, “What a morbid habit, someone reading 5,000 obituaries!” In fact, I’ve been reading them for decades. In all honesty, I’ve been thinking about death almost daily since I was 17, right after my 19-year-old brother died by suicide in 1975. The year before that I was almost killed in a car accident that knocked me out for about five days. I remember telling my parents when I woke up that I should have died because I would never have known it. Weird thought, I know. I still have no recollection of the violent T-boning that finished off the Toyota Corolla I was driving and left me with a severe concussion.

The point is, yes, I think a lot about death, but no, this is not bad for me. I love life, and thinking about death propels me to get things done. I often think, “If I don’t do this now…” Examples: completing the Hawaii Ironman Triathlon, becoming a lawyer, becoming a practising Orthodox Jew, quitting drinking. Again and again I’ve been motivated by the idea (whether valid or not), “If I don’t do this immediately, it’ll be too late.” This mindset has helped me reach numerous goals, to the point that I now feel I can watch Netflix, without guilt, all day.

I’m getting off-point. Let’s see, oh yes: given my obit-reading obsession, it started to bug me to see the phrase “In lieu of flowers” over and over again, as if flowers at funerals were dispensable or even useless.

x“A host, of golden daffodils, beside the lake, beneath the trees”: Post-Renaissance poets (left to right) William Blake, Robert Frost and William Wordsworth are among many writers who have been inspired by the beauty of flowers, eternalizing them in their works. (Source of top painting: Shutterstock)

They are not useless. The idea of adorning funerary rituals with flowers – as a gesture of condolence and a symbol of sympathy and love – is ancient and worthy. Indeed, flowers play a role in so many areas of life. Their visual beauty and fragrance transcend space and time, calming the mind and uplifting the soul. They’ve been inspiring artists and poets for millennia. Some post-Renaissance examples are William Blake’s “Ah Sunflower,” Robert Frost’s “Flower Gathering” and at least six poems by William Wordsworth – two of them called “To the Daisy” – and most famously, “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”:

I wandered lonely as a cloud

That floats on high o’er vales and hills,

When all at once I saw a crowd,

A host, of golden daffodils;

Beside the lake, beneath the trees,

Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.

Giving and displaying flowers has been part of cultures the world over for thousands of years. Flowers still say so much in our modern lives: I love you; I’m sorry; happy birthday; thank-you; merry Kwanza; and, “Don’t these smell beautiful?” The lovely perfume-like aroma and glorious sight of flowers can cheer up a hospital room and draw throngs of tourists to tulip festivals.

xSaying it best when saying nothing at all: From cheering up hospital rooms and attracting tourists to beautifying wedding ceremonies and conveying a religious message, flowers are as versatile as they are lovely. Shown on top right, Australia’s Tesselaar Tulip Festival; on bottom right, marigold garlands worn during Hindu puja ritual. (Sources of photos: (top right) Neos Kosmos; (bottom left) BFA weddings; (bottom right) Garland Magazine)

It’s obvious that sending flowers has long been an important part of funerals in Western countries, or there’d be no need for obituaries and service notifications (whether for a real funeral or one of those increasingly common “celebrations of life”) to begin suggesting mourners do something else. Flowers offer comfort to the bereaved and pay tribute to the deceased. Amidst the sorrow, pain and sometimes horror of death, they’re a vivid signal that the world is – at least in part – gentle, soft and lovely, and that humans do some things solely for beauty. Vividly-blooming cut flowers remind us that new life will surely spring up once more – but that life is fragile and fleeting. Flowers urge us to cherish life while it lasts. The word “flourish” stems from the Latin florem: flower.

Why does “In Lieu of Flowers” bother me so much? Going online and, with a few keystrokes or screen taps, e-transferring funds to a charity specified by the deceased or their survivors erases all of the above. Sending money reduces another aspect of our lives to the drearily transactional. It transforms an act of catharsis and joy into the mechanical fulfillment of an implied obligation. It further weakens the already-fraying connections among people.

(I should mention here that funeral flowers are not a tradition in my faith for several reasons, but since we represent such a small proportion of deaths and obituaries, Jews’ not purchasing funeral flowers doesn’t make a huge dent in flower sales. As well, Jews tend to make up for it by buying tons of flowers for weddings.)

xIsn’t life more than money? As the author argues, the “In Lieu of Flowers” practice reduces a key moment in the process of mourning and reflection into a mechanical/transactional act of fulfilling an obligation. (Source of photo: Pexels)

Another objection for me is the subtle politics sometimes insidiously inserted into what should be an apolitical, purely personal event. Many charities have political or quasi-political agendas, almost always left-leaning or at least supportive of ever-larger government and ever-more regulation. Nobody is for drunk driving, but MADD, for instance, wants anti-impaired driving technology installed that whiffs alcohol and shuts down vehicles, reducing every driver to potential criminal. Other “charities” advocate mandatory vaccination, abortion on demand in the Third World, or veganism, or were historically apolitical but have become infected by wokism. The decedent (or their survivors) thereby try to force friends and other mourners to bend to their politics. This is hardly morally superior to – and should not be considered more acceptable than – sticking with tradition, sending flowers and sustaining a local business in the process.

Which brings me – quirky me – to what most bugs me about “In Lieu of Flowers”: it undermines private businesses. This is a rock-hard conviction on my part. Only businesses can make and keep our country prosperous, peaceful, free and strong. It’s not government that generates prosperity – despite what many Canadians seemingly believe – it is freedom and private business, including the freedom to run private businesses. Without them, there would be no productive jobs, no sales or income to tax. Ultimately, government itself would collapse. Forget rich and free; we’d soon resemble Somalia.

 
Transcending space and time: Flowers’ mesmerizing beauty has been captured by artists down the centuries. Some of history’s more famous examples (clockwise from top-left): Vase of Flowers by Jan Davidsz de Heem, 1645; Vase with Fifteen Sunflowers by Vincent Van Gogh, 1888; Water Lilies by Claude Monet, 1916; Radioactive Nurseries of Enceladus (in the Night Garden) by Marc Quinn, 2010.

Sadly, as Canada becomes more and more woke, as citizens are being coerced in so many areas of life to suffer and comply with government diktat – pride ceremonies, climate change nonsense, over-the-top pandemic restrictions, health system failures – commercial advertisements have become the most cheerful and reassuring messages, telling us our society is not falling completely apart, at least not yet.

x“The most detrimental four words in the floral business”: The juggernaut-like practice of sending money to a (frequently agenda-driven) charity has not only warped the meaning of funerals but cut deeply into the revenues of flower shops – thousands of which are small, locally owned businesses. (Source of photo: Jason Pier in DC, licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0)

Not surprisingly, many Canadians – not unlike the caged inhabitants of the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc for much of the 20th century – are being lulled into the sense that government is the solver of all problems. Our socialist health care system is crumbling. Yet for many, the “cure” is to intensify the very government-centric aspects that created the failures to begin with. Most Canadians would never consider privatizing the system’s major parts – hospitals, medical and nursing schools, and the vast majority of doctors’ payments. The predictable result is that things continue to get worse. Say what you want about the American healthcare system, but in most places you can get a family doctor and access specialized care almost on a whim.

Again I lost the plot. My point was, flower shops are small businesses; there are more than 3,100 of them across Canada. How does the near-ubiquitous “In Lieu of Flowers” affect the retail flower sector? The website Floranext explored the issue in a 2018 blog post entitled, “In Lieu of Flowers – Florists Unite.” It notes that the idea actually goes back as far as the 1950s but has expanded greatly in the last two decades with the growth of charities. It calls the phrase “perhaps the most detrimental four words in the floral business,” one that has ignited “an uproar in the floral community, as it should.” Florists wish they could “bury the term.”

It’s not hard to understand the sentiment – nor why some florists are very careful about how they express it. Susan Murray of Scrim’s Florist in downtown Ottawa makes a heartfelt but diplomatically phrased case for flowers at funerals. “People want to give love and pay respects at funerals, and that’s what flowers do,” Murray says in an interview. “When my father died, it was the people you saw and flowers you received that were so meaningful and so relevant.” Murray later inherited the business from her uncle, Paul Chandler, and notes that, “His obituary says, ‘In lieu of donations, please be kind to one another.’” That witticism points to the subject’s potentially incendiary nature, namely that sticking up for florists is seen by some as an attack on charities. While that seems absurd, it’s real enough that many florists, Murray among them, keep their heads down.

x“People want to give love and pay respects at funerals, and that’s what flowers do”: While North America is increasingly embracing “In Lieu of Flowers,” other cultures such as Japan (left) and Russia (right) continue their ancient tradition. (Sources of photos: (left) Sankei.com; (right) Galeratut.ru)

Not all, however; some florists have no problem discussing the issue in blunt terms. “This is a major Pet Peeve of mine and has been since that phrase was first used YEARS ago,” said Carol Fuller, owner of Fuller’s Floral and Gift Shoppe in Gap, Pennsylvania, on the Floranext website. “It is SO harmful to our industry and has cut our funeral business tremendously.” Fuller notes that funeral directors, in general, seem to be unmoved by this issue. Perhaps they are just oblivious to the damage “In Lieu of Flowers” does to florists.

That is Fuller’s charitable view. “People today do not think of supporting a local business as a charitable event, but it is,” she said. “Without support from people, we can’t stay in business. Especially since the pandemic, it has been hard for small shops to stay open.” If that sounds crass, is it any more crass for a florist to care about their livelihoods (which funerals can obviously enhance) than it is for a charity to gladly receive money figuratively handed overtop of a barely-cold body?

xPutting meaning to grief: When words reach the end, flowers continue speaking. Shown, flowers and tributes left at Kensington Palace following the death of Princess Diana, August 1997. (Source of photo: Maxwell Hamilton, licensed under CC BY 2.0)

Perhaps funeral directors just like it this way. Setting up flower arrangements, then taking them down again and disposing of the flowers is hard work. Some even suggest funeral homes are pushing charitable giving because they want to avoid the hassle and labour costs of floral arrangements. Others vehemently deny this, one funeral director stating in an online article: “Other people outside the immediate family also have to grieve and for many, the public display of grief and support shown in [a] floral arrangement is how they put meaning to their grief.”

Some florists promote doing both during funerals. As one anonymous writer says, there should be “inclusion” – now there’s a term we can all rally around – wherein charities and flowers are each given a place at funerals. “Since the beginning of time flowers have been displayed for the deceased as a symbol of condolences, sympathy, and love,” this florist wrote. “Thousands of years ago, they were used for their wonderful fragrances and soft beauty. In this time of mourning when words are forgotten the flowers offer comfort to their surroundings.” By the way, this writer’s use of the phrase “beginning of time” isn’t a mere rhetorical flourish. There is archaeological evidence that Neanderthals adorned their dead with flowers 70,000 years ago.

Still, today’s “In Lieu of Flowers” is a veritable juggernaut. Can it ever be rolled back? There are a number of ideas. One is to politely confront funeral directors – maybe even at their major conferences, although who would volunteer to go? – to explain the phrase’s destructive effects on florists. Perhaps the words could be subjected to a formal boycott, preferably in partnership with sympathetic funeral homes. Educating customers through blogs, business websites and social media could be amped up. Another option might be to partner with selected charities so flowers are sent when donations are made, and vice-versa. Win-win, as they say. But now we are getting transactional.

xRearranging the playing field: By replacing “In Lieu of Flowers” with less discriminatory messages, the tradition of sending flowers could survive, as would choice – allowing people to make their own heartfelt decision. (Source of photo: Pexels)

The most powerful step is for obituaries to stop using the damning phrase. And that starts with people. It seems to me that lately, “In Lieu of Flowers” has receded slightly on obituary pages. Some are now saying, “Send flowers and donations here,” and others, “Memorial contributions can be sent here.” This could start rearranging the playing field. “There are so many phrases that can be used to convey a less discriminatory message,” one florist, who asked not to be named, told me. “What the floral community is asking for is not to make people send flowers for funeral services, but to leave tradition alone and allow people to make their own heartfelt decision.”

They may be only a small niche in Canada’s overall business community, but flower shops are important in many ways, not least of which is making profits and paying taxes, and continuing to support our ostensibly pro-freedom governments. Supporting a florist through funeral-related business also increases the odds that smaller towns and neighbourhoods can retain independent florists to turn to for happier occasions: anniversaries, Valentine’s Day, birthdays, social occasions and simply to brighten up the home during dreary weather. Oh, and if you’re not quite as uncompromisingly pro-business as me, consider this: the giving of funerary flowers has a charitable element, too, because afterwards they can be donated onward to seniors’ homes, women’s shelters, foster homes or hospital wards, cheering up innumerable people who can’t afford flowers or who might not have anyone in their lives considerate enough to send them flowers.

xNo words needed.

Lynne Cohen is a journalist and non-practising lawyer from Ottawa. She has published four books, including the biography Let Right Be Done: The Life and Times of Bill Simpson.

Source of main image: “Vancouver flower shop” by jimforest, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

What the Oscar-nominated Canadian Documentary Sugarcane Gets Wrong, and Why

The secret to every good magic trick, Michael Caine’s character explains in the 2006 movie The Prestige, is a willing audience. “You want to be fooled,” he says. Anyone watching the Oscar-nominated documentary film Sugarcane could find themselves slipping into a similar act of self-deception. Focused on a residential school in northern B.C., the Canadian-made Sugarcane withholds key facts, arranges other evidence in confusing ways and encourages viewers – already primed to think the worst of residential schools – to reach unfounded conclusions about what they’re actually seeing. Even professional movie critics have been fooled. Documentary filmmaker Michelle Stirling pulls back the curtain on the dark magic behind Sugarcane.

The Dangerous Absurdity of Canada’s “Nation-to-Nation” Treaty with Manitoba Métis Federation Inc.

When the Métis were included in Canada’s 1982 Constitution as “aboriginal peoples”, some members complained that they’d been handed an “empty box” compared to the ample rights and treaties offered to Indian and Inuit people. Since then, however, Canada’s court system has been hard at work filling up that box. Now, with the signing of a “nation-to-nation” treaty late last year, Manitoba Métis have a box that’s positively overflowing with new rights, powers and federal cash. Peter Best explores how Canada came to recognize a fractious, landless, fully-assimilated, colonial-era group – a group that is actually represented by a corporation – as a nation with an inherent right to self-government, as well as the deeply problematic consequences of this decision.

From Brutalism to Beauty: The Case for Returning to Traditional Architecture

Buildings and other public structures, the ancient Roman architectural master Vitruvius wrote, need to be sturdy and long-lasting, must efficiently fulfill the uses and serve the users for which they are intended – and should be pleasing to the eye. Today’s architecture, writes Michael Bonner, is none of these things. In most cases, it’s the opposite – and that is usually by intention, as “starchitects” foist awful designs on an increasingly unwilling public. Thankfully, writes Bonner, there are glimmerings of a way back towards public architecture that not only does its job but reflects timeless principles of form, function, quality and beauty.

More from this author

Research to Ruin: The Worsening Spectre of Academic Fraud

Rather than breaking barriers to knowledge, these days universities seem more adept at breaking the norms of academic conduct. An apparently endless stream of cases involving data manipulation, plagiarism, retractions and other errors and deceptions by researchers ranging from obscure graduate students to world-famous scientific names is plaguing academia in Canada and around the world. But is this avalanche of academic malpractice – what one scientist bemoaned as “corrupt, incompetent, or scientifically meaningless research” – a sign of weakening standards? Or are we now just paying more attention? Examining several troubling examples and interviewing experts from the frontlines, Lynne Cohen probes the dark underbelly of academic fraud.

Mischief Trial of the Century: Inside the Crown’s Bogus, Punitive and Occasionally Hilarious Case Against the Freedom Convoy’s Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, Part II

More people are becoming painfully familiar with the expression “the process is the punishment” – a legal or regulatory matter of such cost, complexity, length and personal stress that, regardless of its formal outcome, the targeted person emerges damaged, sometimes irreparably. It is all-but impossible not to attach this label to the nearly three-year-long prosecution of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, which has included a marathon 13-month-long trial, now awaiting its verdict. In Part II of this series, Lynne Cohen takes readers inside the Ottawa Courthouse – talking to the defendants, their lawyers and other experts – illuminating the Crown’s relentless pursuit of the Freedom Convoy organizers. (Part I can be read here. )

Mischief Trial of the Century: Inside the Crown’s Bogus, Punitive and Occasionally Hilarious Case Against the Freedom Convoy’s Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, Part I

In his judicial review of the Liberals’ response to the 2022 Freedom Convoy protest, Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley ruled that “there was no national emergency justifying the invocation of the Emergencies Act and the decision to do so was therefore unreasonable.” With Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s draconian actions thus exposed as unnecessary and excessive – in other words, illegal and unconstitutional – what now awaits Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, who each face up to 10 years in jail for playing key roles in the protest? In the first of a two-part series, Lynne Cohen charts the lengthy and vindictive prosecution of the pair, from their first appearance in downtown Ottawa to their initial arrest and pre-trial treatment.

Reading Progress

Share This Story by Lynne Cohen

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.