Stories

Something for everyone

David Seymour
October 26, 2013
Everything you know is wrong
Stories

Something for everyone

David Seymour
October 26, 2013
Everything you know is wrong
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

“It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so,” said Mark Twain.  This issue of C2C is devoted to nixing common misconceptions related to the Journal’s values of democratic governance, free markets, individual freedom, peace and security.

Some of the articles in this Issue will meet deep and wide opposition.  That’s good. Deeply and widely held misconceptions withhold the most potential for better understanding.

Some of the greatest misconceptions relate to the project of a society that is simultaneously diverse, tolerant, and equal.  The Quebec values charter controversy is just another instance of the project’s perennial tensions.

And so Paul Bunner takes on the thankless task of setting the record straight on the history of residential schools.  Any serious assessment of Canada’s claim to be an inclusive and equal society must weigh the well-being of the country’s First Nations people. 

Presently to be Aboriginal in Canada is to be disadvantaged on practically every social indicator.  Almost every indicator turns on to the quality of education. The one-sided and hysterical debate over residential schools has cast a shadow over First Nations education that stifles a serious discussion of one of Canada’s most dire and urgent failings, and Bunner’s call for glasnost on Residential Schools is an important step.

Rory Leishman carefully documents the web of interactions between Canadian citizens and offshore terror groups, challenging the belief that multiculturalism has integrated all Canadians behind the values of Peace, Order, and Good Government.

Blaise Boehmer examines the belief—widely held in conservative circles at least, that Brad Wall’s Saskatchewan Party government has delivered the province from its socialist past.  There is plenty more to do, especially for such a capable politician as Premier Wall.

Smugness breaks out across this vast land every time pundits rehearse the tale of Canada’s safe chartered banks and low federal debt.  However Philip Cross, a former chief economic analyst at Statistics Canada, analyses the combined federal, provincial and municipal numbers. The 1990s may be back.

Peter Stockland meditates on the Catholic Church’s motivations with respect to same sex marriage and same sex relations in general.  He argues that while people have every right to be offended by the Church’s stance, a close inspection of its documented position is far more nuanced than commonly reported.

Tim Anderson argues that the Senate is not useless.  What has been discounted, Anderson argues, is a proper understanding of why the Fathers of Confederation installed it. 

Angela Macleod Irons reviews The Righteous Mind, which tackles the view that conservatives don’t care.  It argues from empirical evidence that they draw on a wider range of moral tools than their critics. 

Finally, in an interview with economic historian Vincent Geloso, Nelson Peters teases out Geloso’s careful scholarship that dismisses the economic adulation given the Quiet Revolution in favour of a more defensible explanation.

It has been said that a good library contains something to offend everyone, but in a perfect world this issue will cause no offense.  It should advance understanding about a wide range of Canada’s most urgent challenges.  Enjoy.

David Seymour is editor of C2C Journal.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Ottawa is Playing a Game of Charter Chicken with the Provinces

The federal government has long objected to provinces using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ “notwithstanding” clause, arguing it lets them trample over the rights of Canadians. But that view, flawed as it is, is nothing compared to Ottawa’s latest gambit on this issue, writes Andrew Roman. Liberal Justice Minister Sean Fraser’s recent intervention in the case of Quebec’s Bill 21 asks the Supreme Court of Canada to declare limits on the use of the notwithstanding clause. This would amount to a backdoor amendment of the Constitution by the court, one that would give judges even more power and leave elected representatives even less scope to avoid or undo their harmful decisions. More than just an attack on provincial autonomy, writes Roman, it threatens to upset the balance at the heart of Canada’s federal democracy.

What if October 7 Had Happened Not in Israel but in Canada?

It is probably beyond the imagination of most Canadians that they would ever face the kind of evil atrocity Israelis suffered on October 7, 2023. Or that we would find ourselves living next door to savage terrorists bent on our annihilation. But as Gwyn Morgan points out, it is critical to understand that reality as Israel’s struggle for existence carries on. The history of Israel is nothing short of miraculous. As Morgan personally observed on a tour of the world’s only Jewish state, Israelis have with determination and heart built a free, tolerant, prosperous and technologically-advanced democracy while surrounded by enemies. In the face of ruthless attacks by Hamas and the craven behaviour of supposed friends and allies who now lean in favour of the terrorists, Israel has reminded the rest of the world what real courage is.

One Country, Two Markets: The Shaky Promise and Unfair Burden of “Decarbonized” Oil

“Decarbonized” oil is being touted as a way to bridge the policy chasm separating energy-rich Alberta and the climate-change-obsessed Mark Carney government. Take the carbon dioxide normally emitted during the production and processing of crude oil and store it underground, the thinking goes, and Canada can have it all: plentiful jobs, a thriving industry, burgeoning exports and falling greenhouse gas emissions. But is “decarbonized” oil really a potential panacea – or an oxymoron that makes no more sense than “dehydrated” water? In this original analysis, former National Energy Board member Ron Wallace evaluates whether a massive push for carbon capture and storage can transform Alberta into a “clean energy superpower” – or will merely saddle its industry and government with a technical boondoggle and unbearable costs while Eastern Canada’s refiners remain free to import dirty oil from abroad.

More from this author

The (phony?) generation wars

The past few years have seen a flurry of commentary about intergenerational fairness. There are substantial underlying issues that have led to this, perhaps best

Rankled

What is it about rank-ordered lists that capture our attention? We appear helpless before the Siren call of any list promising the “greatest”, the “biggest” or “the best.” Given Canada’s urban nature, it is unsurprising that Maclean’s magazine – famous for its ranking of Canada’s universities – just days ago released its list of the “Best Communities in Canada 2019”. It’s good fun ridiculing this list’s absurdity for, as everyone knows, Toronto is hands-down the “best community.” In this interview/essay, David Seymour looks at two prominent urbanists – Richard Florida and Joel Kotkin – and examines their competing visions for what, ideally, makes for a prosperous and flourishing city.