Health Care in Crisis

Quick Read

Dead Wait: Canada’s Fatal Obsession with Public Health Care

Gwyn Morgan
August 29, 2025
Canada spends more on health care than just about any other country in the world, and with abysmal results. Yet when it comes to fixing the problem, most politicians and policy-makers are immune to common sense. As business leader Gwyn Morgan writes, allowing private options alongside government-funded health care has been proven to help patients in both systems – around the world and here in Canada, too. Yet the courts continued to uphold restrictions on private care while the Mark Carney government simply promises to throw still more money at the problem – showing itself to be as deluded and dogmatic as those who went before.
Health Care in Crisis

Quick Read

Dead Wait: Canada’s Fatal Obsession with Public Health Care

Gwyn Morgan
August 29, 2025
Canada spends more on health care than just about any other country in the world, and with abysmal results. Yet when it comes to fixing the problem, most politicians and policy-makers are immune to common sense. As business leader Gwyn Morgan writes, allowing private options alongside government-funded health care has been proven to help patients in both systems – around the world and here in Canada, too. Yet the courts continued to uphold restrictions on private care while the Mark Carney government simply promises to throw still more money at the problem – showing itself to be as deluded and dogmatic as those who went before.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

How often do you hear of parents who take a sick or injured child to a hospital emergency room only to wait for untold hours before admission, treatment or at times even an assessment from overloaded admitting or triage nurses? Think of 16-year-old Finlay van der Werken of Burlington, Ontario, whose heartbroken parents last year had to take him off life support and watch him die after the three of them had spent eight fruitless hours in an emergency room, the boy crying out in pain from sepsis and pneumonia. Closer to home, in a case I know of personally, the severely injured 8-year-old daughter of a carpenter doing some work for us waited in great pain from noon until 11 pm before receiving treatment. She survived, at least.

The crisis in Canada’s health-care system deepens. A May 2025 report from the Foundation for Economic Education entitled Canada’s Ailing National Healthcare is not a Model for America notes that some Canadian emergency rooms “have exceeded 200 percent of their official capacity, forcing patients into hallways and onto floors.” This at least suggests that many workers, doctors and administrators are still trying to serve patients even as the system is buckling. At the same time, the report states, “More than 1.3 million Canadians abandoned emergency room visits due to excessive wait times.” One wonders what ultimately happened to their health. The above report used 2023 data. Since then, Canada’s government health-care monopoly has deteriorated further.

Hallway medicine: Some Canadian emergency rooms having “exceeded 200 percent of their official capacity” according to a recent report. Waiting times have become so long that more than 1.3 million Canadians abandoned their emergency room visits altogether.
xHallway medicine: Some Canadian emergency rooms having “exceeded 200 percent of their official capacity” according to a recent report. Waiting times have become so long that more than 1.3 million Canadians abandoned their emergency room visits altogether. (Sources of photos: (left) CTV News; (right) Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Looking beyond Canada’s problem-plagued emergency rooms, how many families lack a family doctor, mandatory for gaining a referral for tests and specialist care? How many injured workers wait so long for treatment and rehabilitation that their deteriorating skills and mobility make them permanently unable to return to work? A report by the think-tank Second Street (discussed in this National Post article) calculates, using partial data, that “15,474 Canadians died in 2023-24 before receiving diagnostic scans or surgeries.” Because of the large gaps in government responses to Second Street’s Freedom of Information requests, the organization believes the actual nationwide number of deaths-while-waiting is about 28,000 – for just one year. Second Street’s findings are consistent with a 2024 Fraser Institute commentary, by Mackenzie Moir and Bacchus Barua, that references the results of the U.S.-based Commonwealth Fund’s annual health policy survey of 31 high-income countries with universal health care. As of 2022, Canada continued to rank dead-last overall in various metrics on timely access to health-care services.

While running for prime minister, notes Fraser Institute Senior Fellow Nadeem Esmail in a recent commentary, Mark Carney promised to “defend the Canada Health Act and build a health-care system that Canadians can be proud of.” Like so many of Carney’s contradictory, both-sides-of-his-mouth promises, his two objectives cannot be met simultaneously. Canada’s health-care system is broken and crumbling further – and the Canada Health Act shoulders much of the blame. Despite Canada already having one of the world’s most expensive universal health-care systems, Esmail notes, its waiting times to access physicians, diagnostic scans and hospital beds rank as the world’s longest. Simply throwing more money at the problem won’t fix it. Accordingly, as Esmail notes, for Carney to “have any hope of accomplishing the latter [objective], he must break the former.”

Dead last: Despite spending proportionately more on health care than most nations, Canada still lags badly on performance metrics. According to another study, an estimated 28,000 Canadians died while waiting for health care in 2023-2024.
xDead last: Despite spending proportionately more on health care than most nations, Canada still lags badly on performance metrics. According to another study, an estimated 28,000 Canadians died while waiting for health care in 2023-2024. (Source of image: Fraser Institute)

How did things get so bad? The abovementioned Commonwealth Fund report notes that all of the countries it surveyed allow or even encourage private-pay access to health care alongside government-funded care. All except one: Canada. That is the key to answering the riddle. And here is a story that helps explain just how we stumbled into our current mess.

Brian Day is an internationally respected orthopaedic surgeon who as a young Vancouver doctor worked in B.C.’s publicly funded hospital system. Throughout his career Day has demonstrated that he cares passionately about delivering top-quality care to patients and to keep them waiting as briefly as possible. He long ago concluded that accomplishing this consistently would require reforming Canada’s health-care system. Day’s recently published book, My Fight for Canadian Health Care, chronicles his struggle.

In the debate over private vs public healthcare, Canada’s position has been clear. The courts continue to uphold restrictions on private care and governments throw more and more money into the public system. Meanwhile, many families lack access to a family doctor, which is mandatory for gaining referrals for tests and specialist care, and hospital wait times get longer, putting patients at risk.

A study of the 31 high-income countries with universal healthcare found Canada ranked dead-last overall in various metrics on timely access to healthcare services. And it was the only country that did not allow or even encourage private-pay access to healthcare alongside government-funded care.

Today’s problems began, he explains, with the 1984 passage of the Canada Health Act in the dying months of the Pierre Trudeau government. “But politicians,” Day notes dryly, “didn’t consider how they would fund their plans.” Sure enough, within a few years, he recalls, “funding constraints forced hospitals to reduce operating room hours. Surgical time allocated to me and my colleagues was progressively cut from twenty to five hours per week, often even less due to emergency cases.” This was a classic case of government rationing access to health care by constraining the system’s ability to get things done.

And so, writes Day, “Together with a small group of friends and supporters, I decided to establish a small private surgical centre.” The Cambie Surgery Centre opened in 1996 – and soon proved that privately delivered health care could both operate more efficiently than government hospitals and directly benefit those same hospitals. “Our procedures encompassed all surgical specialties – and we often did them at 40-50 percent of the [public] cost,” Day writes. “Prior to our opening, many complex procedures were only performed in public hospitals. By transferring them to our centre, public hospital wait times were reduced and capacity was increased.”

Private vs public health care: In 1984, the government of Pierre Trudeau (top left) passed the Canada Health Act, exacerbating the rationing of health services that had been building for the past two decades. In response, orthopaedic surgeon Brian Day (bottom left) co-founded the Cambie Surgery Centre (bottom right) to give Canadians a private alternative. Shown at top right, Canadians rally against Medicare in Regina, Saskatchewan, July 1962.
xPrivate vs public health care: In 1984, the government of Pierre Trudeau (top left) passed the Canada Health Act, exacerbating the rationing of health services that had been building for the past two decades. In response, orthopaedic surgeon Brian Day (bottom left) co-founded the Cambie Surgery Centre (bottom right) to give Canadians a private alternative. Shown at top right, Canadians rally against Medicare in Regina, Saskatchewan, July 1962. (Sources of photos (clockwise starting top-left): Chiloa derivative work: Jbarta (talk), licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0; Bettmann Archive; Cambie Surgery Centre; CCF)

For years, Cambie Surgery operated without much government interference, amassing a following of grateful patients who quietly spread the word. Until 2009 – when the B.C. Nurses Union pressured the provincial government to shut down private clinics under the new provincial Medicare Protection Act. Thus began a long, tortuous and costly legal challenge that went from the Provincial Court to the B.C. Court of Appeal. It ruled against Cambie Surgery despite the judge’s acknowledgement, as the book recalls, that “Wait times in considerable measure flow from government rationing of health care.” (C2C explored the Cambie legal case here and here.)

Another comment of the appeal court judge – “I will await the Supreme Court’s decision” – made it clear that he fully expected the case’s ultimate fate to lie with the Supreme Court of Canada, whose mandate is to decide legal matters of “national Interest”. A retired Supreme Court justice who had been advising Day’s challenge even predicted that, “They’ll have to hear the case because very few matters are more important than health care.”

The Canada Health Act, passed in 1984 during the final months of Pierre Trudeau’s Liberal government, is the legislation that underpins Canada’s public healthcare system. It demands provinces provide medically-necessary health services to all Canadians without patient charge. However, funding constraints mean governments have effectively had to ration access to healthcare, leaving Canada with a system that is among the world’s most expensive, yet least effective. One organization estimated that the number of Canadians who died in 2023-24 while waiting for diagnostic scans or surgeries was about 28,000.

Astoundingly, on April 6, 2023 the Supreme Court announced it would not hear Cambie’s appeal. The current Prime Minister Trudeau – Justin – had vowed to defend the Canada Health Act; to some, the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the Cambie case suggested that Canada’s top court was no longer independent of government. Cambie Surgery’s days as a private provider of government-insured services were at an end; today it still operates as a provider of uninsured services such as sports medicine.

The evidence not only from the Cambie Surgery Centre but from around the world is clear: access to privately operated health care simultaneously delivers great outcomes for the patients who pay for it and relieves demand pressure on government-run facilities, improving overall health care. Canada’s provinces, which have primary responsibility for health care, should be expanding the role of private health care. This needs to be facilitated through reforms to the Canada Health Act, which carries the federal funding hammer.

But how does Carney now plan to fix our dangerously dysfunctional health-care system? A Liberal Party election campaign media release entitled “Mark Carney’s Liberals to protect and modernize Canada’s public health care system” promised to “add thousands of new doctors” to the public system, to spend vastly more on health care, and to slash – as if by magic – health-care waiting times. Meanwhile, the same document snidely denigrated private health-care delivery. Its goals are utterly unrealistic.

Yes, a notable example of a private clinic in Canada was the Cambie Surgery Centre, which opened in Vancouver in 1996. The private centre performed surgical procedures at 40 to 50 percent of the public cost, and by transferring complex procedures to the centre, public hospital wait times were reduced. However, following pressure from the B.C. Nurses Union in 2009, a legal challenge was initiated under the province’s Medicare Protection Act. A B.C. Court of Appeal ruled against Cambie Surgery and in 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada announced it would not hear Cambie’s appeal, ending its ability to operate as a private provider of government-insured services.

Adding more doctors, for example, would require a profound increase in medical school enrollments, something that this recent Globe and Mail article points out would be enormously difficult. It’s also worth noting that enrolment in medical schools was deliberately restricted starting several decades ago in order to limit the supply of new doctors, on the theory that more doctors would provide more care, resulting in higher costs (as Day explains in this C2C article). Another form of rationing.

“Protect and modernize?” Prime Minister Mark Carney (left) has said he intends to increase health care spending and “add thousands of new doctors” to the public system. But decades-old limits on medical school enrolment – really, another form of rationing – make his plan unrealistic.
x“Protect and modernize?” Prime Minister Mark Carney (left) has said he intends to increase health-care spending and “add thousands of new doctors” to the public system. But decades-old limits on medical school enrolment – really, another form of rationing – make his plan unrealistic. (Sources of photos: (left) Prime Minister of Canada, licensed under CC BY 3.0; (right) Trevor Lyons/Radio-Canada)

The overarching problem in Canada’s health-care system is not the specific number of doctors, or the exact level of spending, or the precise number of regulations; it is that the system itself is a dysfunctional government-run bureaucracy, made much worse by the disallowance of private competition. Government-run bureaucracies almost always fail, and usually at a very high cost. There’s no higher cost than the tragic toll taken on millions of ill, injured or dying Canadians.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who was a director of five global corporations.

 Source of main image: Shutterstock.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

Canada’s Other Productivity Crisis: The Daily Irritants That Slow Us Down and Sap Our Spirit

Multi-factor verification. Customer surveys. SMS alerts. Endless online check-ins. Technology was supposed to free up our time for better things. Instead, it has created endless obstacles to getting anything done. Plus there’s the constant impact of government regulations and questionable safety measures that further rob us of our valuable time. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the absurd and annoying ways that 21st-century life ties us up and grinds us down. While some examples seem faintly comical, taken together they comprise what Taylor argues is a micro-productivity crisis of national proportions that is no laughing matter.

More from this author

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

From the Strait of Hormuz to Cuba, Net Zero is Dying – Mark Carney Needs to Let Go

After decades spent pursuing net-zero dreams at great cost to their economies and social fabric, most of the world’s industrialized nations are waking back up. War with Iran and the threat of tanker blockades have everyone worried about oil and natural gas supplies and clamouring for energy security. Or nearly everyone. Not Mark Carney, though. Canada’s prime minister keeps pushing industrial carbon taxes higher and insists on wasting taxpayers’ money on windmills that make no difference. Gwyn Morgan recalls his own observation of the global warming movement’s original rise, its morphing into the radical “net zero” cult – and its spectacular global disintegration. It is high time, Morgan writes, that Canadians demand Carney also drop his delusions.

Future Tense: Why Gen Z is Right to Feel Betrayed

Older generations often roll their eyes when young people seek to blame them for their woes. But if Canada’s Gen Zers feel betrayed by the Boomers, they are right to do so, argues Gwyn Morgan. Years of irresponsible fiscal and regulatory policies have hamstrung the Canadian economy and left younger generations facing a bleak future of stagnant wages, rising taxes and shrinking opportunities. A former business leader who created more than his share of jobs and prosperity during his long corporate career, Morgan casts a worried eye over the next generation – and offers sympathy for the situation they’re inheriting.