Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

The History of Montréal by: Paul-Andre Linteau

201pp.: Baraka Books, 2013

Reviewed by: Olivier Ballou

Next time you walk down rue Saint-Jacques in Montréal – the quaint touristy strip near the city’s famed Old Port – keep in mind that for a hundred years it was home to the largest concentration of wealth and power in Canada. Today, Montréal is better known for its cheap rent, street protests and strip clubs – poor but sexy. The History of Montréal tells the story of how the former “beating heart of a commercial and political empire” reached its current sorry state.

Linteau’s book is a straightforward and unexciting account of Montréal’s history – even its title is dull. The first half charts the growth of the former colonial outpost, replete with Iroquois raiders, a booming fur trade and the British conquête. Montréal’s rise is a testament to the dynamist worldview: unpredictable, organic and based on constant adaptation.

As world trade expanded, Montréal became a magnet for investment. Factories sprouted near the harbour and railway lines, around which were clustered working-class dwellings, which led to the advent of Montréal’s trademark walk-up buildings. Later, electric tramways that allowed workers to live farther from work were in turn scrapped in favour of automobiles.

While Montréal’s English-speaking elite did well, the rising tide also lifted francophone ships:

… [H]undreds of thousands of new residents flocked to Montreal from all over the province …. Professionals, small business owners, insurance agents, and the like all benefited from a richer French-Canadian clientele that was swelling in numbers before their very eyes.

Millions voted with their feet by choosing to live there: Scottish fur barons, French Canadian factory workers, Eastern European Jews. “There was work for everyone, born in Montréal or otherwise ….” However, Anglos fled and immigrants eschewed the city in the latter part of the 20th century: “In the 1970s, Montréal entered a long period of weak growth and economic restructuring. Dark, gloomy clouds settled over the city.” The author compares Expo 67 to a fireworks display that masked the beginning of an inexorable decline. In fact, that same year, experts predicted Montréal’s population would reach five million by 1981, yet it has never surpassed three million.

So what went wrong? In the book’s second half, Linteau’s work falls short. He takes pains to minimize the role of Québec nationalism and other self-inflicted damage in Montréal’s decline. Indeed, it is true that Toronto overtook Montréal as Canada’s economic capital by 1960, long before the Parti Québécois’ victory. However, Linteau describes Montréal’s 1995 real estate nadir without mentioning the referendum of the same year. Linteau notes Montréal’s uncompetitive factories and lack of private investment but never asks whether Québec’s embrace of big government, dirigisme, and high taxes played a role. That is a significant omission in any account of the fall of Montréal as a capitalist city, akin to omitting the rise of competition in automotive manufacturing in any account of Detroit.

On a personal note, I grew up in Québec’s northern hinterlands, and I remember the frisson of walking down rue Sainte-Catherine Est with its concentration of tattoo parlours, peep shows and grimy fast-food joints. I lived in the city for a year but was drawn away from la belle province, first to Ottawa and now Calgary. Indeed, just like the Montréal of old, my Calgary apartment building is filled with newcomers – including many Indian IT workers (Calgary has almost three times as many corporate headquarters per capita as Montréal does). However, Linteau’s account reminds us how quickly things can change. Let The History of Montréal serve as a cautionary tale.

~

Olivier Ballou is Director of Communications at the Manning Centre for Building Democracy and the author of the Graphic Guide to Conservatism.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Ottawa is Playing a Game of Charter Chicken with the Provinces

The federal government has long objected to provinces using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ “notwithstanding” clause, arguing it lets them trample over the rights of Canadians. But that view, flawed as it is, is nothing compared to Ottawa’s latest gambit on this issue, writes Andrew Roman. Liberal Justice Minister Sean Fraser’s recent intervention in the case of Quebec’s Bill 21 asks the Supreme Court of Canada to declare limits on the use of the notwithstanding clause. This would amount to a backdoor amendment of the Constitution by the court, one that would give judges even more power and leave elected representatives even less scope to avoid or undo their harmful decisions. More than just an attack on provincial autonomy, writes Roman, it threatens to upset the balance at the heart of Canada’s federal democracy.

What if October 7 Had Happened Not in Israel but in Canada?

It is probably beyond the imagination of most Canadians that they would ever face the kind of evil atrocity Israelis suffered on October 7, 2023. Or that we would find ourselves living next door to savage terrorists bent on our annihilation. But as Gwyn Morgan points out, it is critical to understand that reality as Israel’s struggle for existence carries on. The history of Israel is nothing short of miraculous. As Morgan personally observed on a tour of the world’s only Jewish state, Israelis have with determination and heart built a free, tolerant, prosperous and technologically-advanced democracy while surrounded by enemies. In the face of ruthless attacks by Hamas and the craven behaviour of supposed friends and allies who now lean in favour of the terrorists, Israel has reminded the rest of the world what real courage is.

One Country, Two Markets: The Shaky Promise and Unfair Burden of “Decarbonized” Oil

“Decarbonized” oil is being touted as a way to bridge the policy chasm separating energy-rich Alberta and the climate-change-obsessed Mark Carney government. Take the carbon dioxide normally emitted during the production and processing of crude oil and store it underground, the thinking goes, and Canada can have it all: plentiful jobs, a thriving industry, burgeoning exports and falling greenhouse gas emissions. But is “decarbonized” oil really a potential panacea – or an oxymoron that makes no more sense than “dehydrated” water? In this original analysis, former National Energy Board member Ron Wallace evaluates whether a massive push for carbon capture and storage can transform Alberta into a “clean energy superpower” – or will merely saddle its industry and government with a technical boondoggle and unbearable costs while Eastern Canada’s refiners remain free to import dirty oil from abroad.

More from this author

Why conservatives should stop worrying and start loving art

Yes a lot of contemporary art is left-wing agitprop. Yes it’s outrageous that taxpayers have to pay for it. And yes some artists take particular pleasure in producing art that makes conservative heads explode. So what? Get over it, writes Olivier Ballou. Art and artists are more politically diverse than conservatives think, and they are the tribunes of a free, democratic and prosperous society. Even the abstract artists!