Stories

Das Kapital for the 21st Century

Colman Byfield
November 4, 2014
Naomi Klein’s new book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. Climate, is not just another earnest plea for a return to Eden (although it is that too). More importantly, it’s a take-no-prisoners attack on the greenwash that muddies the whole debate about climate change. Not content to merely reject market-based solutions, Klein contends the sky is falling because of capitalism itself, and calls for its destruction. If Klein’s “Love Revolution” succeeds, writes C2C reviewer Colman Byfield, expect the proletariat to start stringing up eco-capitalists like Richard Branson and Bill Gates from LED lamp posts.
Stories

Das Kapital for the 21st Century

Colman Byfield
November 4, 2014
Naomi Klein’s new book This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. Climate, is not just another earnest plea for a return to Eden (although it is that too). More importantly, it’s a take-no-prisoners attack on the greenwash that muddies the whole debate about climate change. Not content to merely reject market-based solutions, Klein contends the sky is falling because of capitalism itself, and calls for its destruction. If Klein’s “Love Revolution” succeeds, writes C2C reviewer Colman Byfield, expect the proletariat to start stringing up eco-capitalists like Richard Branson and Bill Gates from LED lamp posts.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

This-Changes-Everything

This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. Climate
NAOMI KLEIN
Knopf Canada, 2014
566 pp., $36.95
Review by Colman Byfield

It might be tempting to dismiss Naomi Klein’s heavy new tome, This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate, as just another enviro-pap triviality. For starters, she employs chapter subheadings like “Growing the Caring Economy, Shrinking the Careless One,” and titled an entire chapter “Love Will Save This Place.” She is enamored of co-ops of all sorts, and frets that her infant son may never get to see a moose. She calls black people (over and over and over again) “communities of color.” The rampant hypocrisy and absurdity that has riven Man’s response to climate change, which she quite skillfully skewers throughout, is often downright riotous, but over a cloyingly earnest 500 pages written in a broad, conversational (this book is for the masses) style, it’s striking how rarely she cracks a smile or attempts a joke, and no one is more ripe for ridicule than the humorless.

But whatever one thinks of climate change or basing complex economies on the currency of Love, this is an important book.

In Klein’s view, cataclysmic climate change is just the hammer needed to shutter-up free markets once and for all. From the horse’s mouth: “… when climate change deniers claim that global warming is a plot to redistribute wealth, it’s not (only) because they are paranoid. It’s also because they are paying attention.”

Klein first sets out to establish that most remaining warming skeptics (who she refers to as denialists or deniers but treats much more charitably than, say, David Suzuki does) are funded by oil companies. She then illustrates in gory technicolor the medium-to-worst case scenarios projected by climate scientists, and quotes several authorities who predict that we have about a decade to limit warming to 2 degrees Celsius over this century, which could well be catastrophic but about the best that can be done at this point.

She lists off the sins of industry, government inaction, United Nations’ failure, and the buying-off of mainstream environmental groups. Some of her best work is in reporting the sham that is the European Union cap-and-trade scheme and exposing the habitual collusion between government, industry, and “Big Green.” (You can tell something is bad in a Klein book when she capitalizes it and prepends “Big”.)

Klein concludes, or more likely, had predetermined, that free market capitalism caused the global warming crisis, and the only way to address the crisis is mass socialization. In her view, the 1980s ushered in an era of unfettered deregulation, reckless trade agreements and privatization of public assets, accompanied by a sudden societal carelessness and greed.

This coincided with a global explosion in greenhouse gas emissions (see!), a surge which the modern world has yet to stem. Further, since Bill Gates began to appreciate the problem, and Al Gore patiently explained it all to Richard Branson in the latter’s private screening room, and all three billionaires have thus far failed to induce a market solution to carbon pollution or even lower their personal emissions, capitalism must be crushed. The only possible solution Klein can conceive of is a wholesale restructuring of the global economy, tightly controlled and rigidly planned, along with a massive redistribution of wealth. And what will power this revolution? Why, People Power, of course.

Through it all, Klein fails either to admit or notice that humanity’s greatest poverty alleviation has come with free markets and trade. In a quick condemnation of manufacturers leaving South Korea for cheaper Chinese pastures, and now uprooting there for Bangladesh, she neglects to point out the simultaneous rise in the standard of living in South Korea and now China.

Yet, Klein is talking about real problems. Governments have generally been far too lax in letting corporations lie, cheat, and run roughshod over private citizens. Klein holds up the atrocities (I don’t use the word lightly) committed in the interests of oil extraction in the Niger Delta as a particularly horrific example. On a much less grievous scale but still worrisome for Canadians concerned about property rights, more Albertans than most of us realize have been effectively chased off their ranches and farms by the oil industry.

And, of course, man made climate change. While there is still some question as to what degree humans are driving it, there is little doubt that it’s happening. Warming skeptics point out that the earth has actually been cooling of late, and attribute weather trends to solar activity and the natural climatic cycles of an ever-changing planet, while mocking the still limited predictive powers of contemporary climate modeling. Even some prominent “warmists” caution their colleagues against exaggeration and alarmism. The bulk of the evidence, though, as interpreted by the majority of experts, suggests man-produced greenhouse gas emissions threaten both our environment and very existence.

Yet, somehow, as Klein attests, almost nothing is being done about this. While cap-and-trade was employed successfully in the United States to combat acid rain, the complexities of imposing such a regime internationally are probably insurmountable, and Klein expertly details how recent efforts devolved into a multi-billion dollar shell game.

Klein is also correct that the market has thus far failed to provide an answer. The geo-engineering schemes she reports being lobbed around by eggheads are, frankly, terrifying. The idea that emissions can be cut relatively painlessly is a fantasy. The best solution, I’d submit, is a hefty global carbon tax, but it remains a political non-starter, whereupon we cross our fingers in hope of a cheap technological leap.

It would seem that we’re fated to taste the fruits of global warming firsthand. From there, anything can happen, including the great Klein love revolution, which presumably ends in the hanging of Richard Branson and his class from the LED lampposts.

No doubt much of the left and the usual grievance-harbourers will find This Changes Everything thoroughly convincing, if they weren’t already convinced. Free market devotees may dismiss Klein’s prescriptions as reheated Marxist dialectics, mashed and greened for a new generation, but they should be paying attention. The simplest, least intrusive measure available to address climate change is a serious carbon tax, and for anyone who cares about climate and free markets, it’s something they should start advocating for yesterday.

~

Colman Byfield is an Alberta writer and columnist with SunMedia newspapers.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

On the Murder of Charlie Kirk: The Left and the Loss of the Tragic Sensibility

The brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk was shocking not only for its violence but for the chilling aftermath – the celebrations on the left, the gloating and the calls for more political violence. In searching for an explanation, Patrick Keeney argues that our culture has lost what Western thinkers long recognized as the “tragic vision” of human life – the idea that suffering is inevitable and even central to the human condition. Without that understanding of innate limits, politics no longer is about compromise or making the best of things but becomes pursuit of a utopia where the righteous are justified in demonizing and destroying their opponents. What is now desperately needed, Keeney argues, is a cultural renewal that accepts the tragedy of life and cultivates courage, charity and, above all, humility.

The Law Society of Alberta’s Wokism Will Dissolve the Rule of Law

Lawyers are supposed to defend their clients, the Constitution and the rule of law. But they’re increasingly under pressure from their own regulators to make a political ideology paramount: wokism. It’s a problem across the country, and it’s not limited to the legal profession: teachers, psychologists, nurses and more must now submit to political re-education and push woke principles in their work, while their political speech as private citizens is increasingly policed. This phenomenon is most dangerous in the law: if lawyers change Canada’s “legal culture” to centre woke victimology, they will effectively undermine the law and the Constitution. In this powerful essay, Glenn Blackett uncovers the woke takeover of the Law Society of Alberta and tells the story of the heroic lawyer fighting back: a “recovered Communist” horrified to see the ideological tyranny he experienced as a young man now being applied in Canada.

Articles of Freedom: What the Constitution of an Independent Alberta Should Look Like

Alberta separatism is often dismissed – even within the province itself – as the domain of a few deluded rural hardliners. But the sentiment and the movement have only grown since the federal election brought another Liberal government to power. And Bruce Pardy, one of the country’s senior legal scholars (and not even an Albertan), thinks it is time for Alberta to prepare – seriously, definitively, foundationally – for independence. Here Pardy presents 13 provisions that create an elegantly simple architecture for the constitution of an independent – and radically free – Alberta.

More from this author

At Last, a Great Canadian War Movie

Paul Gross’ Hyena Road may be the best Canadian war movie ever made. But that’s not saying much because there are so few Canadian war movies, good or bad. Despite our rich military history, Canada’s tiny coterie of government-subsidized moviemakers mostly prefer to create art-house fare, modern urban dramas for the indie-fest circuit. We line up for Hollywood’s inexhaustible supply of American war stories but mostly ignore our own, including Gross’ big, bold, bloody and beautiful account of Canada’s war in Afghanistan. That’s a shame, writes Colman Byfield, because it leaves so many great Canadian stories untold, and weakens our appreciation for the men and women who fight for our country.

Harper vs Notley for the Soul of Alberta

The stunning NDP victory in last spring’s provincial election marked a big leftward shift in Alberta politics. Yet polls consistently indicate another near-sweep of the province for the federal Conservatives this fall. How can this be? On policy and principles, the two parties are as different as night and day. Conservative leader Stephen Harper has made NDP Premier Rachel Notley his primary campaign target in Alberta, blaming her government for making the oil patch recession “much, much, worse”. She coolly replies that Harper is out of touch with the province’s new “values”. Whatever happens October 19, writes Colman Byfield, it won’t end this fight for the political soul of Alberta.

May Day! May Day! Alberta elects the NDP

On the eve of Alberta’s next election here’s an entertaining romp through the last one. Colman Byfield argued that the NDP victory in 2015 was consistent with Alberta voters’ long history of electing big, intrusive governments. Under Social Credit in the 1930s the province started a bank and even invented its own currency. Peter Lougheed’s Progressive Conservative regime bought an airline, created an oil company, and confiscated billions for the Heritage Savings Slush Fund. It was probably inevitable the province would one day elect an actual socialist government. The only surprise, observed Byfield, is how long it took, given how hard the ruling Tory dynasty worked to dethrone itself.