National Finances

“Owe Canada”: Our Nation’s Looming Fiscal Abyss

Gwyn Morgan
July 2, 2025
For anyone who still bought into Mark Carney’s self-declared image as the great global banker who would responsibly manage Canada’s finances, his recent promise to juice defence spending to 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars – must surely be the final straw. The Liberal Prime Minister had already announced massive spending hikes and a huge deficit, with interest on the federal debt to hit $70 billion by 2029. All this will spell doom for a country already struggling with declining productivity, zero growth and a falling standard of living, concludes Gwyn Morgan. The veteran business leader charts Canada’s path to budgetary disaster and places the blame squarely where it belongs – on Canada’s profligate Prime Minister.
National Finances

“Owe Canada”: Our Nation’s Looming Fiscal Abyss

Gwyn Morgan
July 2, 2025
For anyone who still bought into Mark Carney’s self-declared image as the great global banker who would responsibly manage Canada’s finances, his recent promise to juice defence spending to 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars – must surely be the final straw. The Liberal Prime Minister had already announced massive spending hikes and a huge deficit, with interest on the federal debt to hit $70 billion by 2029. All this will spell doom for a country already struggling with declining productivity, zero growth and a falling standard of living, concludes Gwyn Morgan. The veteran business leader charts Canada’s path to budgetary disaster and places the blame squarely where it belongs – on Canada’s profligate Prime Minister.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

When Justin Trudeau became Prime Minister in 2015, he stated his government would incur a “modest short-term deficit” of less than $10 billion in each of its first three years and promised a balanced budget by fiscal 2020. But despite having inherited improving national finances from his Conservative predecessor that were on-track towards a balanced budget in another year or two, Trudeau then ran nine consecutive deficits, the last reaching $61.9 billion in fiscal 2024 – nearly doubling Canada’s accumulated federal debt from $650 billion to $1.24 trillion.

Who could have imagined that a supposedly prudent and ultra-competent former governor of two central banks would make Trudeau look frugal by comparison? The Government of Canada’s recently released spending plan, formally known as the Main Estimates, shows that spending in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2026 will increase by a further 8.5 percent over the current fiscal year to $437.8 billion, plus $74.1 billion in “non-budgetary spending” such as EI payouts, plus at least $49 billion to service the burgeoning national debt. After a couple of other calculations peculiar to the Main Estimates, this yields total planned expenditures of $554.5 billion during Mark Carney’s first year in office.

He’s no Justin Trudeau: Prime Minister Mark Carney was planning even bigger deficits than his free-spending predecessor – and that was before his reckless promise to increase defence spending to 5 percent of GDP. Shown at bottom, expected federal deficits based on the government’s fall 2024 forecast versus the spending promised in the Liberal Party’s 2025 election platform.
xHe’s no Justin Trudeau: Prime Minister Mark Carney was planning even bigger deficits than his free-spending predecessor – and that was before his reckless promise to increase defence spending to 5 percent of GDP. Shown at bottom, expected federal deficits based on the government’s fall 2024 forecast versus the spending promised in the Liberal Party’s 2025 election platform. (Sources: (photo) The Canadian Press/Sean Kilpatrick; (chart) Desjardins)

Even if tax revenues were to remain level with last year, that implies a $40 billion deficit. But given the tariff wars ravaging Canada’s automobile, metals, appliances and consumer goods sectors, the Carney government is facing an all-but certain decline in revenue. Further increasing public spending in the face of these realties will surely result in a record-setting deficit easily exceeding 3 percent of Canada’s GDP and thus dwarfing our meagre annual economic growth.

During Trudeau’s time in office, the Canadian dollar’s foreign exchange value fell from US$0.77 to US$0.696 on January 6, 2025 – the day he finally resigned as Prime Minister. To signal that his departure heralded a new era of fiscal responsibility, much was then made of Carney’s directives that federal departments look for savings and trim staff. But amidst Canada’s daunting financial challenges, such marginal measures are utterly trivial – if they are being implemented at all. Carney’s stunning plan now to actually increase spending will both accelerate inflation and push the international value of our currency down once more.

In a recent article entitled “Mark Carney Was Right: He’s Not Justin Trudeau. He Spends More”, Franco Terrazzano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation points out that Carney’s intensification of Trudeau’s debt-fuelled spending spree will raise interest costs precipitously. “The Main Estimates say that this year the government will spend $49 billion on interest [and] the Parliamentary Budget Officer projects interest charges blowing a $70-billion hole in the budget by 2029,” Terrazzano warns. “This spending spree means Canadians’ kids and grandkids will be making payments on Ottawa’s debt for the rest of their lives.”

Business investment per worker is a key predictor of productivity and living standards; Canada’s has plunged compared to its peers – especially the U.S. – due to burdensome regulations, high taxes and a sclerotic business climate. Shown at top, inside GM’s Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup truck plant in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
xBusiness investment per worker is a key predictor of productivity and living standards; Canada’s has plunged compared to its peers – especially the U.S. – due to burdensome regulations, high taxes and a sclerotic business climate. Shown at top, inside GM’s Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra pickup truck plant in Fort Wayne, Indiana. (Sources: (photo) John Gress Media Inc/Shutterstock; (chart) C.D. Howe Institute)

That brings us to the matter of our country’s credit rating. A nation’s credit rating is vital both for accessing capital markets and determining the interest rate paid; it also carries powerful symbolic value that influences investors’ opinion about a country’s overall economy and investment climate. A recent report by New York-based credit rating firm Fitch Ratings, Inc. provides a warning. “Canada has experienced rapid and steep fiscal deterioration, driven by a sharply weaker economic outlook and increased government spending during the [recent] electoral cycle,” the report states. “If the Liberal program is implemented, higher deficits are likely to increase federal, provincial and local debt to above 90% of GDP.” Although Fitch didn’t yet downgrade its rating for Canada, the firm’s message is clear.

Canadian voters need to stop looking “south” for an easy explanation and – a scapegoat – for our nation’s woes. The Canadian economy was in deep trouble long before Donald Trump’s tariff wars. Business investment per worker is a key predictor of a nation’s evolving productivity and, ultimately, its overall standard of living. “Capital available per Canadian worker has been shrinking since 2015,” warns a recent C.D. Howe Institute media release. Headlined “Canada’s Capital Crisis: The Growing Threat of Falling Business Investment to Productivity”, it continues: “When businesses invest, they equip workers with better tools, driving productivity and, in turn, higher earnings and improved living standards. The fact that Canadian workers are increasingly underequipped compared to their peers abroad signals less competitiveness and lower wages – a threat to our quality of life.”

Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government ran nine consecutive budget deficits, nearly doubling the Canadian national debt to $1.24 trillion, up from $650 billion. His final deficit in fiscal 2024 reached $61.9 billion. During his time in office, the Canadian dollar’s value fell from US$0.77 to US$0.696 on January 6, 2025 – the day he resigned as Prime Minister.

How did Canada fall so far behind? The answers to that question are clearly implied in the report’s list of needed reforms:

  1. Reform corporate taxes to encourage (rather than discourage) capital investment.
  2. Implement a tax incentive for early investment.
  3. Reduce the regulatory barriers that have stymied or delayed natural resource-based projects, particularly oil and natural gas developments.
  4. Promote investment in intellectual property through targeted tax incentives.
  5. Fix policy uncertainty and streamline regulatory processes to create a predictable investment environment.

During the spring federal election campaign, Canadians were inundated with TV and social media ads reminding voters that Carney had headed the Bank of Canada throughout the 2008 financial crisis, implying if not outright boasting that Carney had personally made the decisions enabling Canada to come out the other side in better fiscal shape than other countries. In truth, the key decisions were made by Conservative Prime Minster Stephen Harper and, as Harper himself reminds people to this day, his excellent Finance Minister, the late Jim Flaherty. It was their decisions – operating with only a fragile minority government, no less – as well as the previous decade-plus of sound fiscal management, that kept Canada solvent during the worst global financial crisis since the Second World War.

Now that we see the impact of Prime Minister Carney’s wild spending spree in the face of a trade crisis affecting virtually all government revenues, I’m reminded of former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss’s opinion that Carney “did a terrible job” in her country, being the “governor of the Bank of England who printed money to a huge extent, creating inflation.” At least back in Canada, bank governor Carney didn’t actually wreck the work Harper and Flaherty were attempting to do. So which role might he now reprise as Prime Minister?

Who was the real saviour? Some credit Carney – including Carney himself – for steering the country through the 2008 financial crisis while he was Bank of Canada Governor; in fact, Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, made the key decisions. Shown at left, Harper (right) with Flaherty about to deliver the 2008 budget speech.Who was the real saviour? Some credit Carney – including Carney himself – for steering the country through the 2008 financial crisis while he was Bank of Canada Governor; in fact, Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, made the key decisions. Shown at left, Harper (right) with Flaherty about to deliver the 2008 budget speech. (Sources of photos: (left) The Canadian Press/Sean Kilpatrick; (right) Financial Times)

There are those who think – or perhaps merely hope – that Carney is genuinely committed to strengthening Canada’s economy and will govern in a relatively non-ideological, responsible way that focuses above all on getting large new projects built and driving economic growth. Ten days ago, Robert Lyman and George Koch laid out something of a road map for how a “sensible” version of Carney might set about doing so. Well, I’ve been reading the same signs, watching the same announcements and listening to the same statements, and I simply don’t buy it.

Surely, part of any such “sensible” stance would include trying to wrestle down the federal deficit by making real cuts to expenditures, especially to Trudeau-era programs that do nothing to foster productivity or economic growth. But as I showed above, not only are there no signs of any such belt-tightening, Carney is moving in the opposite direction. At the recent G7 Summit, for example, Carney casually announced $4.3 billion in new aid for Ukraine that had no budgetary authority at all. Personally, I’m convinced Carney is even worse than Trudeau and will steer Canada’s ship of state into a fiscal abyss.

The government’s published spending plan, known as the Main Estimates, shows an 8.5 percent increase in spending for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, to $437.8 billion, plus $74.1 billion in “non-budgetary spending” such as EI payouts and at least $49 billion to service the Canadian national debt. After a couple of other calculations peculiar to the Main Estimates, this yields total planned expenditures of $554.5 billion.

On top of that, Carney made new commitments on NATO spending, first to 2% of GDP this fiscal year and then to 5% of GDP by 2035. This will push Canada’s defence spending to the equivalent of $155 billion per year in today’s dollars. All this extra spending could jeopardize Canada’s credit rating, worsen the Canadian inflation rate and reduce the value of Canadians’ savings.

His recent moves regarding national defence are especially worrying. On June 9, under pressure from the very President he had promised to take on “elbows up”, Carney announced that Canada would fulfill the NATO policy that member nations spend 2 percent of their GDP on national defence – and would do so this fiscal year. Given that Canada’s nominal GDP is approximately $3.1 trillion in current dollars, that will mean almost instantly raising defence spending to about $62 billion – $27 billion or 77 percent higher than contemplated in the Liberal election platform and the recently published Main Estimates. Every dollar of that will add to the deficit, this year and for every year to come.

Then last week, Carney upped the ante by almost unbelievably pledging that Canada would match the new NATO spending target of 5 percent of GDP. If he and his Liberal colleagues follow through, Canada’s defence spending will balloon to the current annual equivalent of $155 billion. This is utterly unaffordable, obviously, and in my view is more revelatory of Carney’s true impulses than any hopes he might govern “sensibly”.

So much for sensible: Succumbing to pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, Carney announced Canada would match NATO’s new defence spending target of 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars. Shown: top left, Trump on June 27 announcing he would end trade talks with Canada due to the digital services tax; top right, Carney at the 2025 NATO Summit, June 2025; bottom left, a Canadian Leopard 2A6 battle tank in Afghanistan, circa 2012; bottom right, two obsolete Canadian Armed Forces CF-18 fighter jets.
xSo much for sensible: Succumbing to pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, Carney announced Canada would match NATO’s new defence spending target of 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars. Shown: top left, Trump on June 27 announcing he would end trade talks with Canada due to the digital services tax; top right, Carney at the 2025 NATO Summit, June 2025; bottom left, a Canadian Leopard 2A6 battle tank in Afghanistan, circa 2012; bottom right, two obsolete Royal Canadian Air Force CF-18 fighter jets. (Sources of photos: (top left) Hu Yousong/Xinhua via ZUMA Press; (top right) The Canadian Press/Sean Kilpatrick; (bottom left) NAOC)

Millions of Canadians were fooled by Mark Carney’s image as the great global banker, the serious and experienced technocrat who could safeguard Canada’s vital interests in going eyeball-to-eyeball against Trump. That image is starting to crack. Instead of respecting Carney, Trump is almost toying with him, last Friday announcing on social media that the U.S. was pulling out of the much-ballyhooed bilateral trade talks launched at the G7 Summit less than two weeks earlier – and brusquely adding that Carney would find out the new tariff rates on Canadian goods in the following seven days.

Falling business investment is a concern for the Canadian economy because it’s a key predictor of productivity and a country’s standard of living. Since 2015, the amount of business investment per worker has been shrinking, which hurts productivity, keeps earnings down and ultimately means a lower standard of living. The fact that Canadian workers are increasingly underequipped compared to their peers in other countries signals declining competitiveness and lower wages, which threatens Canadians’ quality of life.

Meanwhile, Carney’s spending plans threaten to create an all-but unmanageable fiscal mess, jeopardizing Canada’s important credit rating, which S&P Global Ratings still has at AAA, with Fitch at AA+. It pains me to say that Canadians face a continuation of declining living standards and inflationary reduction in the value of their hard-earned savings. We can only hope for an early election that unseats Carney’s nation-impoverishing minority government.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who was a director of five global corporations.

Source of main image: Shutterstock.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Jason Kenney and the End of All Things (Or Maybe Just a Democratic Vote)

Time was a former political leader’s expected role was to enjoy retirement in obscurity, reappearing at the occasional state funeral or apolitical charity event smiling inscrutably and saying nothing. While former U.S. President Bill Clinton broke this mould and fellow Democrat Barack Obama won’t stop delivering lectures, conservatives generally stick to tradition. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, however, just can’t help himself – literally. Collin May probes the curious, maddening and somewhat sad case of a once-respected leader who, having dug his own political grave, now seems to think the way out is to keep shovelling.

On the Murder of Charlie Kirk: The Left and the Loss of the Tragic Sensibility

The brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk was shocking not only for its violence but for the chilling aftermath – the celebrations on the left, the gloating and the calls for more political violence. In searching for an explanation, Patrick Keeney argues that our culture has lost what Western thinkers long recognized as the “tragic vision” of human life – the idea that suffering is inevitable and even central to the human condition. Without that understanding of innate limits, politics no longer is about compromise or making the best of things but becomes pursuit of a utopia where the righteous are justified in demonizing and destroying their opponents. What is now desperately needed, Keeney argues, is a cultural renewal that accepts the tragedy of life and cultivates courage, charity and, above all, humility.

The Law Society of Alberta’s Wokism Will Dissolve the Rule of Law

Lawyers are supposed to defend their clients, the Constitution and the rule of law. But they’re increasingly under pressure from their own regulators to make a political ideology paramount: wokism. It’s a problem across the country, and it’s not limited to the legal profession: teachers, psychologists, nurses and more must now submit to political re-education and push woke principles in their work, while their political speech as private citizens is increasingly policed. This phenomenon is most dangerous in the law: if lawyers change Canada’s “legal culture” to centre woke victimology, they will effectively undermine the law and the Constitution. In this powerful essay, Glenn Blackett uncovers the woke takeover of the Law Society of Alberta and tells the story of the heroic lawyer fighting back: a “recovered Communist” horrified to see the ideological tyranny he experienced as a young man now being applied in Canada.

More from this author

Dead Wait: Canada’s Fatal Obsession with Public Health Care

Canada spends more on health care than just about any other country in the world, and with abysmal results. Yet when it comes to fixing the problem, most politicians and policy-makers are immune to common sense. As business leader Gwyn Morgan writes, allowing private options alongside government-funded health care has been proven to help patients in both systems – around the world and here in Canada, too. Yet the courts continued to uphold restrictions on private care while the Mark Carney government simply promises to throw still more money at the problem – showing itself to be as deluded and dogmatic as those who went before.

Restoring Canada Special Series
Part II: Carney’s Energy Policy and the Fragile Canadian Economy

“Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss,” The Who’s Pete Townshend wrote back in 1971. Words that today might well apply to Mark Carney. Canada’s new Liberal Prime Minister says he wants to make Canada a “conventional and clean energy superpower”, and suddenly seems to support new oil and natural gas pipelines. But Gwyn Morgan, who devoted years as a CEO to defending Canada’s oil and natural gas industry, doesn’t buy it. Carney, he notes, spent years abroad on an ever-more-strident net-zero quest, and recently said he’s keeping his predecessor’s oil and gas emissions cap in place. In this incisive critique, Morgan takes the measure of the new PM and finds that the prospects of restoring the Canadian economy have dimmed further.

Appetite for Destruction: How a Decade of Liberal Rule Cratered Canada’s Economy

With a blunt and determined president south of the border and an election in the offing, Canada is at a crisis point – one that has come after a decade of disastrous policies from Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government that have transformed Canada into an economic weakling. In this devastating critique, Gwyn Morgan lays out the main reasons for Canada’s self-inflicted economic decline and the steps that must be taken to get serious in this new reality. And Morgan offers a stark warning: Mark Carney may seem more sophisticated and competent than Trudeau, but he has spent much of his career as a champion of the same destructive agenda. It’s time for real change.