Stories

How “Hitler’s Pope” saved 200,000 Jews after Kristallnacht

Michael Coren
July 15, 2010
New research backs up what objective historians have long known, Pope Pius XII sheltered Jews—contrary to later smears that he was “Hitler’s Pope”….
Stories

How “Hitler’s Pope” saved 200,000 Jews after Kristallnacht

Michael Coren
July 15, 2010
New research backs up what objective historians have long known, Pope Pius XII sheltered Jews—contrary to later smears that he was “Hitler’s Pope”….
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

<spanlang=”EN-US”>Sometimes it’s difficult avoid the clichés: “I told you so”; “What’s the point?”; “It’s like beating my head against a wall” and so on. The reason being that at long last mainstream media seems to have got the message that Pope Pius XII, Pontiff during the Second World War, was one of the good guys. Newspapers across the world recently reported comments made by German historian <spanlang=”EN-US”>Dr. Michael Hesemann, who has been carrying out research in the Vatican archives. Hesemann said Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli — the future Pius XII — wrote to Roman Catholic archbishops urging them to apply for visas for “non-Aryan Catholics” and Jewish converts to Christianity who wanted to leave Germany, and that as many as 200,000 may have been saved by Pacelli’s actions. <spanlang=”EN-US”> <spanlang=”EN-US”>”We believe that many Jews who were successful in leaving Europe may not have had any idea that their visas and travel documents were obtained through these Vatican efforts,” said Elliot Hershberg, chairman of the Pave the Way Foundation, which sponsored the work.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>What is so surprising about the latest reports is that they are, well, apparently so surprising. “Everything we have found thus far seems to indicate the known negative perception of Pope Pius XII is wrong” explained Hershberg.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>I’m not entirely sure who to whom he’s been speaking. Informed historians have known the truth for years. What the new research does, however, is confirm all this and provide some more flesh to the bones of the story. Hesemann insists, for example, that not only Jewish converts but ordinary Jewish people also receive visas and were helped to escape<spanlang=”EN-US”>.<spanlang=”EN-US”>”The fact that this letter speaks of ‘converted Jews’ and ‘non-Aryan’ Catholics indeed seems to be a cover,” he said. <spanlang=”EN-US”>”You couldn’t be sure that Nazi agents wouldn’t learn about this initiative. Pacelli had to make sure they didn’t misuse it for their propaganda, that they could not claim that the Church is an ally of the Jews.”

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>The date of the appeal from the <spanlang=”EN-US”> <spanlang=”EN-US”>Cardinal Pacelli, then the Vatican’s Secretary of State, to his colleagues in the Church, is also crucial: November 30, 1938 was less than three weeks after Kristallnacht, the “night of broken glass,” during which the Nazis attacked Jewish synagogues, homes and businesses, and was an early and acute response to the anti-Jewish violence. Remember, even after this date there were German Jews and international Jewish organizations who were convinced that the Nazis had no future and that German Jews would in the end be safe.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>This spirit of goodness is not <spanlang=”EN-US”>news to those of us who have worked on this issue for some years, some of us out of familial and emotional necessity. I am a Catholic whose father was Jewish. Not only Jewish but from a Polish family. The role of Pope Pius and the Church during the Second World War is to me at the epicenter of identity, loyalty and truth. There are Jewish leaders who claim that Pope Pius said little and did less as Europe’s Jews were rounded up and slaughtered. The truth is somewhat different. Before he became Pope Pius, Cardinal Pacelli drafted the papal encyclical condemning Nazi racism and had it read from every pulpit. The Vatican used its assets to ransom Jews from the Nazis, ran an elaborate escape route and hid Jewish families in Castel Gondolfo—the Pope’s summer residence. The World Jewish Congress donated a great deal of money to the Vatican in gratitude and in 1945 Rabbi Herzog of Jerusalem thanked Pope Pius, “for his lifesaving efforts on behalf of the Jews during the occupation of Italy.” When the Pope died in 1958 Golda Meir, then Israeli Foreign Minister, delivered a eulogy at the United Nations praising the man for his work on behalf of her people.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>For 20 years it was considered a self-evident truth that the Church was a member of the victim class during the Second World War and Pope Pius was mentioned with Churchill and Roosevelt as part of a triumvirate of good. It was as late as the 1960s that the cultural architecture began to be restructured around this issue. It’s deeply significant that the attacks on the Pope were largely initiated by the German playwright Rolf Hochhuth; he claimed in his play, The Deputy, that the Vatican had ignored the plight of the Jews. What is seldom mentioned is that Hochhuth was a renowned anti-Catholic who would later champion Holocaust-denier David Irving.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>Hundreds of thousands of Catholic religious and lay people risked their lives and sometimes gave them to help the Jewish victims of the Nazis. To a very large extent their sacrifices have gone uncelebrated, even ignored. Shamefully much of the criticism of the Church comes from within and from critics who use the issue to vicariously attack orthodoxy and Popes John Paul and Benedict. This was precisely the case with John Cornwell’s risible book Hitler’s Pope. In a scholarly response, Rabbi David Dalin’s The Myth of Hitler’s Pope, stated that people are trying to, “exploit the tragedy of the Jewish people during the Holocaust to foster their own political agenda of forcing changes on the Catholic Church today.”

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>But the last word should go to another Jewish man. In 1945, the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli, publicly embraced Roman Catholicism. This extraordinary conversion was partly due to Zolli’s admiration for the Pope’s sheltering and saving of Italian Jews. The battle for Pope Pius’s reputation will continue and there will still be disagreements between Jewish and Catholic people of goodwill. But the overwhelming message is one of hope and progress, in spite of what the enemies of all genuine religious and a group of angry, disappointed modernist Catholics would prefer to be the case.

<spanlang=”EN-US”>

<spanlang=”EN-US”>Michael Coren’s forthcoming book Why Catholics Are Right (McClelland & Stewart) contains a chapter on the Pope, the Church and the Holocaust.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Jason Kenney and the End of All Things (Or Maybe Just a Democratic Vote)

Time was a former political leader’s expected role was to enjoy retirement in obscurity, reappearing at the occasional state funeral or apolitical charity event smiling inscrutably and saying nothing. While former U.S. President Bill Clinton broke this mould and fellow Democrat Barack Obama won’t stop delivering lectures, conservatives generally stick to tradition. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, however, just can’t help himself – literally. Collin May probes the curious, maddening and somewhat sad case of a once-respected leader who, having dug his own political grave, now seems to think the way out is to keep shovelling.

On the Murder of Charlie Kirk: The Left and the Loss of the Tragic Sensibility

The brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk was shocking not only for its violence but for the chilling aftermath – the celebrations on the left, the gloating and the calls for more political violence. In searching for an explanation, Patrick Keeney argues that our culture has lost what Western thinkers long recognized as the “tragic vision” of human life – the idea that suffering is inevitable and even central to the human condition. Without that understanding of innate limits, politics no longer is about compromise or making the best of things but becomes pursuit of a utopia where the righteous are justified in demonizing and destroying their opponents. What is now desperately needed, Keeney argues, is a cultural renewal that accepts the tragedy of life and cultivates courage, charity and, above all, humility.

The Law Society of Alberta’s Wokism Will Dissolve the Rule of Law

Lawyers are supposed to defend their clients, the Constitution and the rule of law. But they’re increasingly under pressure from their own regulators to make a political ideology paramount: wokism. It’s a problem across the country, and it’s not limited to the legal profession: teachers, psychologists, nurses and more must now submit to political re-education and push woke principles in their work, while their political speech as private citizens is increasingly policed. This phenomenon is most dangerous in the law: if lawyers change Canada’s “legal culture” to centre woke victimology, they will effectively undermine the law and the Constitution. In this powerful essay, Glenn Blackett uncovers the woke takeover of the Law Society of Alberta and tells the story of the heroic lawyer fighting back: a “recovered Communist” horrified to see the ideological tyranny he experienced as a young man now being applied in Canada.

More from this author

Totalitarianism, Eugenics and Abortion

American rapper Kanye West has filed paperwork to run for president. The newly Gospel-preaching artist has also openly condemned abortion. Michael Coren examines how eugenics and social engineering have historically been a pet project of leading leftists (including some in Canada) who wanted a world free from “feeble-minded” (and often lower-class and non-white) people.

Islam and Western Society

Michael Coren asks whether Islam is reconcilable with western, pluralistic values. Using examples of the Islamic reaction to the Danish cartoons of Mohammad and how one particular town in England has changed through Muslim immigration, he raises severe doubts about the future of the relationship unless we change out current attitudes. Coren explains that while many Muslims simply want to live as westerners, we have yet to fully understand the radical Islamic imperative which seeks to transform the nature of any society where it settles. It would be simple, but incredibly dangerous, to assume that Islam follows similar patterns to other religions. He argues that this debate is the most important of the age.