Ideology and Realpolitik

How to Create Impoverishment and Energy Insecurity

Gwyn Morgan
March 14, 2022
As fighting rages in Ukraine, energy prices soar and inflation spirals, countries and their leaders are showing what they’re made of. Some appear jolted by reality and are recalibrating foreign relations, fiscal regimes and energy policies. Others are doubling down on blind ideology. Despite acute vulnerability to Russian energy blackmail, for example, Germany still intends to shutter the last of its nuclear power plants. And Justin Trudeau, representing a country sitting on the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, was last week pledging to help the world transition to “renewables.” Where will such unshakeable utopianism lead? To a truly terrible combination, writes Gwyn Morgan: inflation- and tax-induced impoverishment for millions of Canadians, increasingly intermittent and unaffordable energy supplies for peace-loving countries, and no effective check on geopolitical bullies who use energy as a weapon.
Ideology and Realpolitik

How to Create Impoverishment and Energy Insecurity

Gwyn Morgan
March 14, 2022
As fighting rages in Ukraine, energy prices soar and inflation spirals, countries and their leaders are showing what they’re made of. Some appear jolted by reality and are recalibrating foreign relations, fiscal regimes and energy policies. Others are doubling down on blind ideology. Despite acute vulnerability to Russian energy blackmail, for example, Germany still intends to shutter the last of its nuclear power plants. And Justin Trudeau, representing a country sitting on the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, was last week pledging to help the world transition to “renewables.” Where will such unshakeable utopianism lead? To a truly terrible combination, writes Gwyn Morgan: inflation- and tax-induced impoverishment for millions of Canadians, increasingly intermittent and unaffordable energy supplies for peace-loving countries, and no effective check on geopolitical bullies who use energy as a weapon.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Crude oil prices soared beyond a staggering US$120 per barrel in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. But that’s not a new record. Inflation-adjusted oil prices reached the same level in 2013 (and were repeatedly above US$100 per barrel from 2011 through mid-2014), driving a supply-increase response that temporarily lowered prices. World oil demand then steadily increased and reached 100 million barrels per day before the Covid-19 collapse. Demand has since come roaring back and despite all the “Net Zero” rhetoric, the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that world oil demand will continue to grow. The big question is: who will supply all that oil? Middle Eastern countries, led by Saudi Arabia, will be major contributors and, despite the U.S. and U.K.’s bravado in banning Russian imports, current and forecast world oil demand cannot be met without Russian oil.

xThe world will continue to use crude oil, but who will supply it? With the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, Canada could have become an “energy superpower.” Instead, the Liberal government cancels new oil and natural gas pipelines (top) and fosters eastern Canada’s continuing dependence on Middle Eastern and African oil, imported via tankers up the St. Lawrence River in Quebec (bottom). (Sources of photos: (top) www.capp.ca, (bottom) www.canadaaction.ca)

The disparate list of countries controlling world oil supply may soon include Iran if, as news reports suggest, U.S. President Joe Biden is naïve enough to remove oil export sanctions in return for the Ayatollah’s “pledge” to suspend uranium enrichment for nuclear weapons development. That would leave world oil supply security in the hands of countries that subjugate women, a country led by a murderous psychopath and a country developing a nuclear bomb with the avowed objective of annihilating Israel (a threat that Iran’s leaders and generals have issued innumerable times; here is just one example).

Meanwhile Canada, with the world’s third-largest oil reserves and the potential to produce far more than its current approximately 4 million barrels per day, is sacrificing hundreds of billions of dollars per year in revenues and new capital investment, along with tens of thousands of well-paying jobs, on the Net Zero altar with policies that discourage new production and all-but rule out building new oil export pipelines. Even a proposed cross-country pipeline that would have delivered Canadian oil to eastern refineries was deliberately stymied by the Trudeau government, leaving tankers carrying Saudi Arabian and African oil up the fragile Gulf of St. Lawrence, while emitting immensely more greenhouse gases than domestic oil.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Speaking in London in July 2006, before departing for a Vladimir Putin-hosted G8 Summit in St. Petersburg, then Prime Minister Stephen Harper called Canada “an emerging energy superpower.” Oil and natural gas industry capital investment rose sharply in the following years, doubling from $30 billion to $60 billion per year before the Harper government’s defeat in 2015. By 2019, Trudeau’s anti-oil and natural gas policies had contributed greatly to collapsing capital spending to less than half of 2006 levels – a decline of 75 percent from their Harper-era peak. While a dip in commodity prices early in the Trudeau years played a role, oil and natural gas industries around the world were soon booming once more. But not Canada’s. The situation we find ourselves in today is largely the result of deliberate policy choices.

xDeliberate destruction: After rising to record levels under Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada’s annual capital spending on oil and natural gas development declined dramatically under Justin Trudeau. (Source: Statistics Canada)

Most Canadians are unmindful of these issues. But if there’s one thing that gets their attention, it’s the price of gasoline (and diesel) at the pump. The current escalation of fuel prices must be sending anti-fossil-fuel ideologues worshipping at the Net Zero altar into celestial orgasm. But not real-world working Canadians. On March 4, gasoline in B.C. hit $2.00 per litre, taking the cost of filling up the family minivan or crossover utility vehicle to at least $150. Given the sprawling nature of Canadian cities, commuting to work, running a few errands and getting the kids to and from school generally takes at least one fill-up per week. That amounts to more than $600 per month for one family vehicle. And people who commute downtown from bedroom communities or tradespeople operating a full-sized truck have it far worse. Let’s look at the three highest-gas-price cities as of March 4:

Toronto –                    

Pump price: $1.75/litre

Taxes: $0.57/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

HST                                    $0.21

Provincial fuel tax       $0.15

Montreal – 

Pump price: $1.84/litre
Taxes: $0.59/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

QST+GST                         $0.23

Provincial fuel tax       $0.15

Vancouver –

Pump price: $2.01/litre

Taxes: $0.67/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

GST                                    $0.10

Provincial fuel tax       $0.02

B.C. transport tax        $0.07

City transit tax              $0.18

B.C. carbon tax             $0.09

In all three examples, federal and provincial taxes make up about one-third of the price of fuel. As these prices continue to escalate, food and other necessities have also risen to record levels across the country. A recent Angus Reid survey found that 53 percent of Canadians already consider themselves unable to keep up with the rising cost of living.

xThe equivalent of a pay cut, only worse: As gasoline cracked $2 per litre in B.C. in early March, the costs of groceries and other basic goods continued their inexorable rise, creating worsening economic pressure on Canadian families. (Source of top photo: Vancouver CityNews)

The 11 cents per litre in federal carbon tax don’t seem like much compared with current total pump prices. But that’s just the beginning. The Trudeau government plans to progressively increase the carbon tax to 38 cents per litre by 2030. Adding the 9-cent-per-litre B.C. carbon tax (just one of seven taxes levied on motor fuels in that province) means that drivers in that province will pay carbon taxes of 47 cents per litre. The theory behind carbon taxes is that higher prices will reduce consumption of the thing being taxed and its associated activities – in this case, driving, which emits carbon dioxide, the ostensible target of Net Zero ideology.

But this theory only applies in practice if there’s a viable alternative. For millions of already cost-stressed real-world Canadians to whom their vehicle is a must-have for their small business, getting to work or maintaining their family lives in a busy world, imposing carbon taxes on fuel simply impoverishes them. They still need to drive. As they spend more on fuel, they are forced to spend less on everything else. That is equivalent to taking a cut in pay, only in some ways worse, because this pay cut keeps increasing month by month. (As an important side note, I should mention that natural gas prices have also been climbing. This increases the costs of home heating and of electricity in many provinces. It is also generally inflationary as operating businesses, commercial buildings and public facilities becomes more expensive. So this is another source of impoverishment, one that hits people who don’t even own a vehicle.) 

At this time, when Russian President Putin threatens to cut oil exports, the importance of unleashing Canada’s enormous crude oil (as well as natural gas) resources has never been clearer. While visiting Latvia on March 8, a reporter asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau if Canada could help make up the oil supply shortage. His answer illustrated the fanatical depth of his worship at the Net Zero altar: “We will be there to support, as the world moves beyond Russian oil and indeed, beyond fossil fuels, to have more renewables in our mix.”

xConveniently erasing the “energy superpower”: Justin Trudeau’s (left) fixation on pushing “renewables” at the expense of Canada’s oil and natural gas sector is great for Vladimir Putin’s (right) war chest and his blackmailing of energy-starved Europe. (Sources of photos: (left) The Associated Press /Roman Koksarov), (right) The Associated Press /Mikhail Klimentyev, Sputnik)

This incredible answer – an ungrammatical melange of ideology, non-sequitur and attempted misdirection from the moment’s acute urgency – comes at a time when innocent Ukrainians and their beautiful country are being ravaged by a megalomaniac who threatens the world with nuclear Armageddon. President Putin should be grateful to Trudeau for helping him control world oil markets by hamstringing Canada’s “energy superpower” potential. Let’s be crystal-clear: the Liberal government’s policies are driving us towards a horrific combination of impoverishment and energy insecurity. All of it entirely avoidable. Never before have I been ashamed of being a Canadian. I pray for new political leadership that will make me, and millions of other dispirited Canadians, proud of our country again.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Source of main image: Shutterstock.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Manufactured Judgements: How Canada’s Courts Promote Indigenous Radicalism

What’s the worst possible thing that can happen to a homeowner? It’s probably not a flooded basement, an infestation of rodents or things falling apart due to shoddy workmanship. It’s that the very concept of their ownership rights could be pulled out from under them. Such was the shocking outcome of a B.C. Supreme Court ruling over the summer which handed aboriginal title to a swath of B.C.’s Lower Mainland that has been privately owned and occupied by others in good faith for more than 150 years. On Canada’s National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, Peter Best takes a close look at the judge’s actions in the case of Cowichan Tribes v. Canada and reveals the many ways in which the court abandoned the precepts of impartiality and fact-based legal reasoning in order to come to the aid of the native claimants.

Jason Kenney and the End of All Things (Or Maybe Just a Democratic Vote)

Time was a former political leader’s expected role was to enjoy retirement in obscurity, reappearing at the occasional state funeral or apolitical charity event smiling inscrutably and saying nothing. While former U.S. President Bill Clinton broke this mould and fellow Democrat Barack Obama won’t stop delivering lectures, conservatives generally stick to tradition. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, however, just can’t help himself – literally. Collin May probes the curious, maddening and somewhat sad case of a once-respected leader who, having dug his own political grave, now seems to think the way out is to keep shovelling.

On the Murder of Charlie Kirk: The Left and the Loss of the Tragic Sensibility

The brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk was shocking not only for its violence but for the chilling aftermath – the celebrations on the left, the gloating and the calls for more political violence. In searching for an explanation, Patrick Keeney argues that our culture has lost what Western thinkers long recognized as the “tragic vision” of human life – the idea that suffering is inevitable and even central to the human condition. Without that understanding of innate limits, politics no longer is about compromise or making the best of things but becomes pursuit of a utopia where the righteous are justified in demonizing and destroying their opponents. What is now desperately needed, Keeney argues, is a cultural renewal that accepts the tragedy of life and cultivates courage, charity and, above all, humility.

More from this author

Dead Wait: Canada’s Fatal Obsession with Public Health Care

Canada spends more on health care than just about any other country in the world, and with abysmal results. Yet when it comes to fixing the problem, most politicians and policy-makers are immune to common sense. As business leader Gwyn Morgan writes, allowing private options alongside government-funded health care has been proven to help patients in both systems – around the world and here in Canada, too. Yet the courts continued to uphold restrictions on private care while the Mark Carney government simply promises to throw still more money at the problem – showing itself to be as deluded and dogmatic as those who went before.

“Owe Canada”: Our Nation’s Looming Fiscal Abyss

For anyone who still bought into Mark Carney’s self-declared image as the great global banker who would responsibly manage Canada’s finances, his recent promise to juice defence spending to 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars – must surely be the final straw. The Liberal Prime Minister had already announced massive spending hikes and a huge deficit, with interest on the federal debt to hit $70 billion by 2029. All this will spell doom for a country already struggling with declining productivity, zero growth and a falling standard of living, concludes Gwyn Morgan. The veteran business leader charts Canada’s path to budgetary disaster and places the blame squarely where it belongs – on Canada’s profligate Prime Minister.

Restoring Canada Special Series
Part II: Carney’s Energy Policy and the Fragile Canadian Economy

“Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss,” The Who’s Pete Townshend wrote back in 1971. Words that today might well apply to Mark Carney. Canada’s new Liberal Prime Minister says he wants to make Canada a “conventional and clean energy superpower”, and suddenly seems to support new oil and natural gas pipelines. But Gwyn Morgan, who devoted years as a CEO to defending Canada’s oil and natural gas industry, doesn’t buy it. Carney, he notes, spent years abroad on an ever-more-strident net-zero quest, and recently said he’s keeping his predecessor’s oil and gas emissions cap in place. In this incisive critique, Morgan takes the measure of the new PM and finds that the prospects of restoring the Canadian economy have dimmed further.