Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Former Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe has said goodbye to politics.  After Montreal’s La Presse reported how the Bloc Québécois broke parliamentary rules by paying its party’s general manager out of House of Commons funds for seven years, Duceppe said he would devote himself full-time to “defending my integrity and re-establishing my reputation.” The allegations made it “impossible to envision a return to active politics,” said Duceppe. That means he won’t run for the leadership of Quebec’s Parti Québécois, a Crown that everyone knew he wanted and thought he deserved instead of the current party boss, Pauline Marois.

If Duceppe does actually leave Canadian politics for good, so much the better. Separatists have been costly for Canada and Duceppe was a too-effective advocate for that cause. He even obtained—only in Canada—the official opposition post in Parliament between 1993 and 1997.

Of related note to his time in federal politics, Duceppe’s personal federal pension for his years of “service” in Ottawa is $140,765 annually according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. That’s expensive but of more importance, symbolic of the fiscal damage wrought upon the country’s fabric.

The cost to Quebec of separatist chatter has been decades of lost investment, migration of talent out of the province, and public policy within the province that focused on linguistic battles as opposed to fixing Quebec Inc. The cost to Canada has been instability when we could least afford it: think of the 1995 referendum that took place just as Canada was recovering from the sluggish early 1990s.

One doubts this will happen, but perhaps Duceppe will have a quiet retirement in Florida where his hard-left policies (he was a Marxist until his thirties and never broke from that mindset) and his break-up-Canada troublemaking might finally fade into Florida sunsets.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

What’s Yours is Ours: Why Canada’s Charter Ignores Property Rights and What That Means for Everything You Own

“The whole meaning of life,” famed comedian George Carlin once observed, “is trying to find a place for all your stuff. That’s what your house is, it’s a place for your stuff with a cover on it.” If so, then Canadians should be very concerned about their stuff. Unlike nearly every other modern nation, Canada lacks constitutional affirmation of the right to own property and as protection against its unjust seizure. With a recent B.C. Supreme Court ruling putting the very notion of home ownership at risk, Peter Shawn Taylor seeks out legal opinions on Canada’s surprisingly lax attitude towards property rights, how it differs from other countries and what that means for everyone’s possessions. If Canadians really want to protect their homes, belongings and personal finances, Taylor concludes, now’s the time to get loud.

The Righteous Response: What Canada Can Learn from America’s Fight Against Antisemitism

Canadians frequently criticize U.S. President Donald Trump’s projection of American power. But in the fight against anti-Semitism, Canada could learn a thing or two from our neighbour to the south. In Part One of this series, Lynne Cohen revealed how Canada’s political and civic leaders have chosen to ignore or even abet the hate crimes and abuse Jews have suffered since October 7, 2023. In this second installment, she shows how the U.S. – from the President on down to local officials and law enforcement – has fought back. Where Canada has been cowering and cowardly, the U.S. has resolved to fight anti-Semitism, protect its Jewish citizens and defend Israel’s right to live freely as a Jewish state.

One Free Miracle: Towards a Theory of Everything

A new year has dawned and, as the light strengthens across the Northern Hemisphere, David Solway reminds us that how we choose to experience our world is at least as important as understanding how it came to be. In the first instalment of this two-part series, the writer illuminated the irreducible paradox at the heart of all theories concerning the universe’s creation, then scrutinized the seemingly unbridgeable gap between quantum physics and the physical world we live in. In Part II he considers an even tougher and, so far, unsolved scientific challenge: gravity. Some of the finest minds in science think it actually is insoluble without some kind of creative intelligence to oversee it. In other words, a miracle. To Solway, the true miracle is the fact of a marvellous world and our freedom to experience and wonder at it.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.