Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Former Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe has said goodbye to politics.  After Montreal’s La Presse reported how the Bloc Québécois broke parliamentary rules by paying its party’s general manager out of House of Commons funds for seven years, Duceppe said he would devote himself full-time to “defending my integrity and re-establishing my reputation.” The allegations made it “impossible to envision a return to active politics,” said Duceppe. That means he won’t run for the leadership of Quebec’s Parti Québécois, a Crown that everyone knew he wanted and thought he deserved instead of the current party boss, Pauline Marois.

If Duceppe does actually leave Canadian politics for good, so much the better. Separatists have been costly for Canada and Duceppe was a too-effective advocate for that cause. He even obtained—only in Canada—the official opposition post in Parliament between 1993 and 1997.

Of related note to his time in federal politics, Duceppe’s personal federal pension for his years of “service” in Ottawa is $140,765 annually according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. That’s expensive but of more importance, symbolic of the fiscal damage wrought upon the country’s fabric.

The cost to Quebec of separatist chatter has been decades of lost investment, migration of talent out of the province, and public policy within the province that focused on linguistic battles as opposed to fixing Quebec Inc. The cost to Canada has been instability when we could least afford it: think of the 1995 referendum that took place just as Canada was recovering from the sluggish early 1990s.

One doubts this will happen, but perhaps Duceppe will have a quiet retirement in Florida where his hard-left policies (he was a Marxist until his thirties and never broke from that mindset) and his break-up-Canada troublemaking might finally fade into Florida sunsets.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Ottawa is Playing a Game of Charter Chicken with the Provinces

The federal government has long objected to provinces using the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ “notwithstanding” clause, arguing it lets them trample over the rights of Canadians. But that view, flawed as it is, is nothing compared to Ottawa’s latest gambit on this issue, writes Andrew Roman. Liberal Justice Minister Sean Fraser’s recent intervention in the case of Quebec’s Bill 21 asks the Supreme Court of Canada to declare limits on the use of the notwithstanding clause. This would amount to a backdoor amendment of the Constitution by the court, one that would give judges even more power and leave elected representatives even less scope to avoid or undo their harmful decisions. More than just an attack on provincial autonomy, writes Roman, it threatens to upset the balance at the heart of Canada’s federal democracy.

What if October 7 Had Happened Not in Israel but in Canada?

It is probably beyond the imagination of most Canadians that they would ever face the kind of evil atrocity Israelis suffered on October 7, 2023. Or that we would find ourselves living next door to savage terrorists bent on our annihilation. But as Gwyn Morgan points out, it is critical to understand that reality as Israel’s struggle for existence carries on. The history of Israel is nothing short of miraculous. As Morgan personally observed on a tour of the world’s only Jewish state, Israelis have with determination and heart built a free, tolerant, prosperous and technologically-advanced democracy while surrounded by enemies. In the face of ruthless attacks by Hamas and the craven behaviour of supposed friends and allies who now lean in favour of the terrorists, Israel has reminded the rest of the world what real courage is.

One Country, Two Markets: The Shaky Promise and Unfair Burden of “Decarbonized” Oil

“Decarbonized” oil is being touted as a way to bridge the policy chasm separating energy-rich Alberta and the climate-change-obsessed Mark Carney government. Take the carbon dioxide normally emitted during the production and processing of crude oil and store it underground, the thinking goes, and Canada can have it all: plentiful jobs, a thriving industry, burgeoning exports and falling greenhouse gas emissions. But is “decarbonized” oil really a potential panacea – or an oxymoron that makes no more sense than “dehydrated” water? In this original analysis, former National Energy Board member Ron Wallace evaluates whether a massive push for carbon capture and storage can transform Alberta into a “clean energy superpower” – or will merely saddle its industry and government with a technical boondoggle and unbearable costs while Eastern Canada’s refiners remain free to import dirty oil from abroad.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.