So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Mark Milke
October 5, 2019
Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Mark Milke
October 5, 2019
Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

Monday evening’s official English-language federal party leaders’ debate is to have five “moderators” – which is to say, none at all. Instead, party leaders Justin Trudeau, Andrew Scheer, Jagmeet Singh, Elizabeth May, Yves-François Blanchet and Maxime Bernier will be interrogated by five equally ranked questioners. It would have seemed fitting and, one might hope, not too much to ask that debate organizers made some attempt to build a lineup of moderators who have a grasp on the entire country. As it is, Central Canadian assumptions, questions and concerns will likely dominate the evening. Canadians could use a little thought diversity.

That’s one diversity failure. Here’s another: Not only are all five moderators female, all are journalists – mainly broadcast journalists. That they all happen to be female shouldn’t matter, except that the monochromatic approach to moderators is so obviously a sop to modern identity politics. So that what counts is not what’s inside the person’s head or her character, but merely her gender.


Yet another lack-of-diversity problem: One journalist is from a large Toronto newspaper – but none is from either of Canada’s national newspapers. All have spent the bulk of their careers working in Central Canada or for eastern-based organizations, and four are actually from Ontario. All five appear to be predictably “progressive”.

In announcing the moderators, the debate consortium might as well have just said “Because it’s 2019”, with obvious reference to Justin Trudeau’s famous 2015 comment on why his cabinet was half-female. Since then, identity politics has grown even stronger. Still, even within that framework – i.e., submitting to the insistence on the “diversity” of an all-female lineup – the other issues were entirely avoidable. For one simple reason: much better female alternatives were available.

A better panel of moderators would show diversity of thought as well as having some conception of what Canada is actually like in 2019 – from Vancouver to St. John’s – and not form a bloc suggesting a throwback to the Central Canada-focused, “Laurentian elite”-run nation of 1867. A fresher and broader perspective could be expected to yield better questions – and, one would hope, better answers as well.

While only the debate itself will provide the answer, the records of the selected questioners of our would-be prime ministers and of our Dauphin, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, suggest cause for concern:

Dawna Friesen, Global News.

Dawna Friesen, Global News – Identity politics is likely to feature prominently in Monday’s debate questions. Friesen is an example of the tendency. She recently seemed enthralled by how British Prime Minister Boris Johnson was “stopped in his tracks” by the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court when he tried to prorogue Parliament. Agree or take Johnson’s side, what stood out was this part of Friesen’s tweet: “…delivered by the first female president of the court, Lady Brenda Marjorie Hale.” This suggests an infatuation with gender over the substance of whether Johnson or the UK’s Supreme Court itself acted contrary to the country’s largely unwritten constitution.

Rose Marie Barton, CBC.

Rosemary Barton, CBC – A CBC lifer, including in its French division, Barton once took a selfie with Justin Trudeau. While selfies are a plague nowadays, it’s still difficult to imagine, for example, the late Cokie Roberts of ABC, one of America’s best-ever female journalists, doing the same with presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, either George Bush, or Barack Obama, all of whom she covered.


Althia Raj, Huffington Post, Canada.

Althia Raj, Huffington PostPerhaps surprisingly for someone who now works for a consistently left-leaning to left-wing online media organization, Raj has broader media experience than several other moderators, having worked for both PostMedia and Sun Media. She also has significant experience outside journalism, having been a foreign service officer and working at the UN. But here’s the rub: in a 2014 interview, when asked why she moved into journalism from the bureaucracy, Raj remarked that, “I was a big CBC radio fan and I applied for a Gzowski internship when I was at McGill. A recruiter I met while I was at the CBC ended up introducing me to some folks at the CBC in Ottawa and that’s really where I got my start.”

Lisa LaFlamme, CTV News.

Lisa LaFlamme, CTV News – The genial and usually upbeat-seeming LaFlamme has spent her career in private-sector media, mostly CTV, but also lacks any Western Canadian exposure in her media CV. And while she seems a capable enough news anchor, she often seems too affable. She has never been known to dissect politicians and other prominent figures in the relentless manner of, for example, former Fox News’ host Megyn Kelly. Among the many who have felt Kelly’s wrath are Donald Trump, when Kelly co-hosted Fox’s first Republican primary debate in 2015.


Susan Delacourt, Toronto Star.

Susan Delacourt, Toronto Star Delacourt is as reliable a Laurentian and liberal as they come. She has been covering federal politics – often from Parliament Hill – since the 1980s. The Star’s declared mandate is “progressive”, with a long history of promoting highly interventionist state policies and providing platforms to left-wing columnists. Currently Delacourt is listed as a “scholar” and a “Trudeau mentor” at the Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation, set up by the Jean Chretien government with $125 million in taxpayers’ dollars.

Her loyalties appear to extend across generations. In 2009, Delacourt penned a fawning e-book about Justin Trudeau, entitled, Justin Trudeau: Can he bring the Liberal party back to life? In which she mused about the younger Trudeau’s leadership potential. In the Star, Delacourt recently seemed to be attempting to redirect attention from the infamous blackface photos by laying the blame at the feet of those dastardly Yanks. She wrote that, “the biggest American intrusion into the Canadian federal election has been Time magazine’s publication of old photos of Justin Trudeau in brownface.”

Alternate candidates

The debate consortium could have done much better than the five moderators it selected. Here are five top candidates who reflect Canada regionally, politically and in their personal backgrounds – in other words, who show actual diversity.

Margaret Wente, Globe and Mail.

Margaret Wente, Globe and Mail – Wente is not from the West, but it doesn’t matter. The longtime Globe columnist is originally from Chicago, which might explain her frank, no-nonsense approach, her crisp, clear writing style and her openness to conservative ideas and viewpoints from regions where progressivism and Laurentian assumptions aren’t repeated by rote.

It wouldn’t be surprising to see Wente press Green Party Leader Elizabeth May on her party’s habit of attracting anti-Semitic wingnuts, and People’s Party leader Maxime Bernier on his lack of judgment. One can imagine Wente asking Bernier some variation of this question: “Mr. Bernier, you lost to Andrew Scheer by a vapour, with 49 percent of the Conservative Party’s votes. If you were in business, how smart would it be to give up a 49 percent market share to a competitor by shutting down your company and starting over?’’

Christie Blatchford, National Post.

Christie Blatchford, National PostThe lifelong Central Canadian journalist (she has worked at the Toronto Sun, the Globe and Mail and is now with the National Post) has never let location define her work. She is, quite simply, always focused on the average Canadian, and how politicians and police can hurt them when not in their corner. Whether critical of politicians’ cave-ins to blunt-force protests that undermine the rule of law (Caledonia), her eschewing of a common media assumption that every Indigenous Canadian is a permanent victim, or her grasp on how Alberta’s energy sector provides dignity for working men and women, Blatchford has always thought outside the Laurentian intellectual box. While instinctually conservative on many issues, she’s anything but a sycophant and could be trusted to go after every federal leader, including Andrew Scheer on some of his policy weaknesses.

Adrienne Batra, Toronto Sun.

Adrienne Batra, Toronto SunThe Saskatchewan-born Batra was once the Manitoba director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, then served as an aide to the late Rob Ford, the troubled former Mayor of Toronto. Currently Batra is the Toronto Sun’s editorial page editor. This article noted that “Batra was the first woman of colour named editor-in-chief of a major metropolitan newspaper in North America, in 2015…but went largely unnoticed.” That appears to be because Batra doesn’t care about identity politics. She got where she is not by trumpeting her gender and skin colour, but by being smart, tough and contrarian.

Batra would be an ideal adopted-Ontarian who yet remembers the West. She would have little time for any candidate who dodges questions on fiscal profligacy. Given her background and character, it would not be surprising to see Batra asking Trudeau something like this: “Mr. Prime Minister, never mind blackface, when you travelled to my ancestral homeland last year, what possessed you to think it was national costume dress-up day?”

Catherine Ford, retired former editorial page editor of the Calgary Herald.

Catherine Ford Ford is the crusty, retired former editorial page editor of the Calgary Herald. Ford would turn Alberta into a provincial version of The Annex in Toronto, where left-wing authors and social justice advocates comfort each other in a progressive echo chamber. Nonetheless, Ford is nothing if not opinionated. As a moderator, she could be expected to behave almost like an anti-LaFlamme. The lifelong feminist might well shred Pierre Trudeau’s son for his betrayal of feminism with his record of groping and of firing strong women.


Danielle Smith, CHQR Radio, Calgary.

Danielle Smith, CHQR Radio (Calgary) – Smith could grill six federal party leaders intelligently and make all squirm. Smith has a strong background outside journalism, having interned at the Fraser Institute, started up a property rights organization and led Alberta’s Wildrose Party from obscurity to Official Opposition. She knows of what she speaks and could be expected to sympathize with the challenges encountered by political leaders without being even slightly in thrall to the mystique. Unlike Friesen or LaFlamme, say.

Smith’s parents lost everything in the early 1980s under Pierre Trudeau’s National Energy Program. A libertarian with liberal social impulses, Smith is one of those rare journalists who reads policy papers. Smith’s questions would not be predictable, but she would have studied and memorized every policy position and platform plank of each of the six parties represented on that stage on Monday night, and would have zeroed in on each item’s strengths, weaknesses and inconsistencies.

Perhaps in 2020?

Given that Canada’s two national newspapers, the National Post and Globe and Mail, were excluded from the 2019 federal election debate consortium, perhaps they should figure out a way to play a greater role in the next election. With polls suggesting the October 21 vote will deliver either a minority Liberal or minority Conservative government, it’s quite likely the instability will see the government fall before long. Canada could be back in election mode as early as next year.


In this age of alternative media, the two newspapers and perhaps others in new media should set up their own “consortium”. And next time, choose Wente, Blatchford, Batra, Ford and Smith (if they prefer not even to tap into the other half of the human race). Election Debate 2020 would become a gritty, intelligent and unpredictable grilling of every federal leader.

Mark Milke is an independent policy analyst and author. His newest book is The Victim Cult: How the culture of blame hurts everyone and wrecks civilizations.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Pictured is Gulliver tied down by the Lilliputians. Illustrating the plight of civil servants under increasing regulation.

Slow Death by Regulation, the Great Public-Sector Disease

When do the words “transparency” and “accountability” mean the opposite of what an untutored citizen might think? Why, when they’re passing the lips of a Canadian civil servant. The federal bureaucracy also seems the one place where the digital revolution made everyone less productive. And while this sounds amusing (if pathetic), the federal bureaucracy’s power and intrusiveness just grow and grow while the freedoms of individuals and voluntary associations shrink and shrink. Former citizenship judge Joe Woodard takes a wry look at these trends and with good humour tracks the deadly serious slide of Canada from a free society in which everything that isn’t specifically forbidden is allowed, into something sadder, darker and more constrained.

Do journalism subsidies work when it comes to maintaining the quality of the industry?

Journalism Subsidies: A Case Study in Government Failure

Judging by the sheer volume of information coming our way, the Canadian news media are the very picture of health. But quantity isn’t indicative of quality, and the age of clickbait could put the final nail in the coffin of the nation’s legacy media. So who cares? Well, as online upstarts fill only a tiny proportion of the resulting void, the size, influence and market share of the taxpayer-subsidized CBC continue to grow – and some want it to grow further still. Could that possibly be good for diversity of news and views? Lydia Miljan lays out what ails the Canadian media business model, charts the deterioration of journalistic quality, points to the bright spots and makes the case for two practical and achievable federal policies that could allow our media sector to save itself.

Even before the collapse in air travel as a result of the lockdown, airport bankruptcy was a real possibility. Now with the collapse of the industry...

Could Canada’s Airports Go Bankrupt? (And Could That Be the Best Thing for Them?)

The debt-fuelled buildout of Canada’s airports, predicated on the dubious though common premise of unending growth in air travel, has stalled badly. While there’s been virtually zero news media attention, it seems the entire Canadian airport operating model could be about to crash and burn – at a time when governments are themselves wildly over-committed through their own borrowing binges. In this thoroughly reported original, Peter Shawn Taylor dissects Canada’s uniquely strange and problematic approach to owning and running airports, explains how we got into this mess and, looking to Europe and Australia for guidance, charts a way back out.

More from this author

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Calumny and Courage in the Energy War

No sooner had Alberta announced its “fight back” strategy to counter misinformation aimed at the province’s key industry – including a public inquiry into foreign funding of anti-energy groups – than the left counterattacked. Instead of mounting facts and evidence of its own, they accused Alberta’s UCP government of violating the human rights of the progressives’ pantheon of designated victims. These shout-down-discredit-and-destroy tactics are ubiquitous tools of leftists nowadays, but in this instance the target may be tougher than expected. Mark Milke explores the energy war’s competing campaigns for the hearts and souls as much as the minds of Canadians.

Missing the plot in Alberta’s election: What the media party missed

Mark Milke had a ringside seat in the Alberta election as the lead architect of the United Conservative Party platform. What he saw was a startling disconnect between media coverage and the issues that mattered most to Albertans. The economic focus of UCP policy earned the party a million votes and a huge majority. Through bias, ignorance, or both, the media often missed the story.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.