Limits of Vaccines

No, We Can’t Jab Our Way Out of the Pandemic

Gwyn Morgan
November 29, 2021
Early this fall C2C Journal posed the question whether countries should rely so heavily on vaccination to subdue the Covid-19 pandemic – whether we could “inject our way” out of trouble. The massive autumn waves of infection in numerous heavily vaccinated countries should have prompted serious reflection – perhaps even a change in direction. Yet even as the latest mainstream research and recent events demonstrate that the vaccines are only partially protective and woefully temporary, our public authorities are further intensifying vaccination programs while crushing the lives of the unvaccinated. Gwyn Morgan, an early proponent of universal vaccination, puts the pieces together and demands that we consider a new approach.
Limits of Vaccines

No, We Can’t Jab Our Way Out of the Pandemic

Gwyn Morgan
November 29, 2021
Early this fall C2C Journal posed the question whether countries should rely so heavily on vaccination to subdue the Covid-19 pandemic – whether we could “inject our way” out of trouble. The massive autumn waves of infection in numerous heavily vaccinated countries should have prompted serious reflection – perhaps even a change in direction. Yet even as the latest mainstream research and recent events demonstrate that the vaccines are only partially protective and woefully temporary, our public authorities are further intensifying vaccination programs while crushing the lives of the unvaccinated. Gwyn Morgan, an early proponent of universal vaccination, puts the pieces together and demands that we consider a new approach.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

This column contains facts and assessments that paint a different picture of current measures to contain the novel coronavirus. I present this information not as an expert but as a person with a lifelong obsession for examining policies and beliefs I find incongruous. For example, if vaccination protects from the virus, why are vaccinated people fearful of the unvaccinated? Are these fears, apparently shared by hundreds of millions of people around the world, entirely irrational? Or do they indicate an instinctive sense that something might be wrong with the vaccines?

These thoughts prompted a lot of additional reading. While I’m aware of some of the more novel ideas out there, I deliberately avoided relying on sources that, however well-meaning they might be, could be dismissed as extreme. The information I present here comes entirely from mainstream sources that are unimpeachable by those who are making public health and pandemic management decisions.

The creation of multiple Covid-19 vaccines in an astonishingly short period was a stunning achievement by the biotech industry. The vaccines were approved for “emergency use” in just a few months, rather than the 8-10 years normally required to thoroughly assess the longer-term risks of previous vaccines developed in the past 50 years. Most Canadians were more than willing to accept the added risk, which in any event our public authorities promised us was negligible, and still do. According to federal government data, over 86 percent of Canadians 12 and older are “fully vaccinated,” including yours truly. (Percentage as of November 26; figures at the linked site are updated daily.)

As millions of Canadians received their first and then second shots last spring, rapidly diminishing Covid-19 infection rates seemed to indicate the pandemic was nearing an end. But as summer turned to fall, the more contagious Delta variant gained a foothold and in some provinces and countries unleashed a fourth wave that, by some measures, was the worst one of all. Soon, case numbers and hospitalizations were escalating.

And that escalation was blamed on the unvaccinated, creating divisiveness that’s tearing at the social fabric of our nation. You’re either a vaccinated “good Canadian” or a villainous “anti-vaxxer.” The federal government’s decision to forbid the unvaccinated from working in the public service and federally regulated corporations created a cascade of prohibitions soon extending to post-secondary education and hundreds of thousands of businesses and other private organizations large and small. The unvaccinated can no longer work in much of the private sector, study in person, go to restaurants, gyms or sports events, or even travel on public transportation. And, in a flagrant violation of basic Canadian rights and freedoms, the Prime Minister suddenly issued a dictatorial edict forbidding air travel – even for those with a negative Covid-19 test.

xA new society, divided: From keeping their job to attending in-person classes, from enjoying a hockey game to dining out, those hesitant to get the jabs have been all-but banished from normal life. Even a negative Covid-19 test does not buy one the “privilege” to fly in Canada – the government’s latest innovation. (Source of images: The Canadian Press)

But now, increasing reports that fully vaccinated persons are getting and transmitting the virus are demolishing the very foundation of those divisive and draconian restrictions. A prime example is widely circulated news that 10 players and a coach of the fully vaccinated Ottawa Senators NHL team tested positive for the virus. Even more worrying is that these fully vaccinated players infected their families. Another widely reported example is the quarantining of hundreds of Canadian soldiers who had participated in a training exercise at Canadian Forces Base Petawawa that apparently triggered a Covid-19 outbreak. A spokesman for the military stated that everyone involved was fully vaccinated. And just days ago we learned that Canadian rock legend Bryan Adams – himself also fully vaccinated – tested positive for Covid-19 in October and again upon arriving in Milan for a photo shoot just last week.

This and other evidence that fully vaccinated persons can both contract and spread the virus is momentous, and should be considered a game-changer. I’ve long been puzzled why the supposedly immune “fully vaccinated” worry about catching Covid-19 from the unvaccinated. Now it’s the unvaccinated who should be worried about catching the virus from the vaccinated.

Despite these clear signals that something about current pandemic management isn’t working, vaccination hysteria continues raging throughout the country with children as young as five being forced to roll up their sleeves, an imponderable and dangerous decision. Imponderable because children who contract the virus almost never die of it. The latest Canadian government statistics show that just 19 Canadians under age 19 have died of the virus in the past 18 months. (At the linked site, scroll down to Figure 7, then click on “deceased.”) According to other reports, most of these cases had serious comorbidities. Tragic as each of these cases is, statistically they add up to a very small number – roughly the same number as the pre-pandemic 12-month average for the seasonal flu.

xNo emergency, little sense: The vaccination program for children aged five to 11 has been set in motion despite two yawning issues: Children’s virtually zero risk of dying from Covid-19 and the unknown long-term effects of the vaccines on their developing immune systems. But the pro-shot propaganda is relentless and manipulative; at right, a “Brave Child” certificate is issued to a young Montreal boy for getting the jab. (Source of images: The Canadian Press)

And forcing vaccines upon this large demographic is dangerous because the long-term impact of injecting children with a DNA-based drug before their immune systems mature is completely unknown. The Covid-19 vaccines were approved for “emergency use.” Where is the emergency for children? There is none; the vast majority of children and youths who “get” Covid-19 do not fall seriously ill, or at all. Canadians aged 19 and under represent 21.3 percent of all “cases,” 2.1 percent of hospitalizations and 0 percent of fatalities.

New research, financed by Pfizer and published in The Lancet medical journal, found the protection level of that vaccine (administered to most Canadians) drops to less than 50 percent in just five months. This startling news has worried health officials sending urgent messages offering third and even fourth booster shots. No one knows if the protection period will continue to wane, but it should be clear that trying to hold back the virus mainly with vaccines sets up an endless booster-shot gerbil wheel that’s a golden dream for drug manufacturers, without providing genuine immunization for the population let alone restoring the “normal” we all long for.

If never-ending booster shots aren’t the answer, what is? A study published in the journal Nature concluded that many people who have recovered from SARs-CoV-2 “will probably make antibodies against the virus for most of their lives.” This “natural immunity” effect appears comparable to that developed for measles and other viral diseases – longer-lasting than vaccines, and probably stronger too. So the millions of unvaccinated people who are catching and recovering from Covid-19 are making an important contribution in moving societies towards “herd immunity.”

This should be recognized, and some countries are doing so. Germany, for example, treats recovered persons the same as the fully vaccinated. Canada, by contrast, applies the same restrictions to the recovered as to the unvaccinated.

The fixation on vaccination (top) is both self-defeating and unnecessary. Much greater emphasis should be placed on therapies to treat Covid-19 (middle). And countries such as Canada must at last recognize the positive role that could be played by natural immunity, which is likely to be stronger and longer-lasting than vaccination, as a recent study by Nature (bottom) concluded. (Source of top two images: Shutterstock)

Clear evidence that vaccinated people can and do contract and spread the virus destroys the underlying premise of vaccine passports. It also undermines the notion – apparently a near-religious belief among our public health authorities and political class – that we can vaccinate our way out of the pandemic. It should create much greater urgency to develop better treatments – especially outpatient therapies – for those sickened by Covid-19.

Unfortunately, back in never-never land, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, fresh from COP-26 where he pledged to lead the world off fossil fuels, has announced that he intends to also lead the world out of the Covid-19 pandemic with the creation of a “global vaccine passport.” One can only hope that his quixotic global fantasies take him far, far away. The two-thirds of Canadians who didn’t vote for him would be overjoyed.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Jason Kenney and the End of All Things (Or Maybe Just a Democratic Vote)

Time was a former political leader’s expected role was to enjoy retirement in obscurity, reappearing at the occasional state funeral or apolitical charity event smiling inscrutably and saying nothing. While former U.S. President Bill Clinton broke this mould and fellow Democrat Barack Obama won’t stop delivering lectures, conservatives generally stick to tradition. Former Alberta Premier Jason Kenney, however, just can’t help himself – literally. Collin May probes the curious, maddening and somewhat sad case of a once-respected leader who, having dug his own political grave, now seems to think the way out is to keep shovelling.

On the Murder of Charlie Kirk: The Left and the Loss of the Tragic Sensibility

The brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk was shocking not only for its violence but for the chilling aftermath – the celebrations on the left, the gloating and the calls for more political violence. In searching for an explanation, Patrick Keeney argues that our culture has lost what Western thinkers long recognized as the “tragic vision” of human life – the idea that suffering is inevitable and even central to the human condition. Without that understanding of innate limits, politics no longer is about compromise or making the best of things but becomes pursuit of a utopia where the righteous are justified in demonizing and destroying their opponents. What is now desperately needed, Keeney argues, is a cultural renewal that accepts the tragedy of life and cultivates courage, charity and, above all, humility.

The Law Society of Alberta’s Wokism Will Dissolve the Rule of Law

Lawyers are supposed to defend their clients, the Constitution and the rule of law. But they’re increasingly under pressure from their own regulators to make a political ideology paramount: wokism. It’s a problem across the country, and it’s not limited to the legal profession: teachers, psychologists, nurses and more must now submit to political re-education and push woke principles in their work, while their political speech as private citizens is increasingly policed. This phenomenon is most dangerous in the law: if lawyers change Canada’s “legal culture” to centre woke victimology, they will effectively undermine the law and the Constitution. In this powerful essay, Glenn Blackett uncovers the woke takeover of the Law Society of Alberta and tells the story of the heroic lawyer fighting back: a “recovered Communist” horrified to see the ideological tyranny he experienced as a young man now being applied in Canada.

More from this author

Dead Wait: Canada’s Fatal Obsession with Public Health Care

Canada spends more on health care than just about any other country in the world, and with abysmal results. Yet when it comes to fixing the problem, most politicians and policy-makers are immune to common sense. As business leader Gwyn Morgan writes, allowing private options alongside government-funded health care has been proven to help patients in both systems – around the world and here in Canada, too. Yet the courts continued to uphold restrictions on private care while the Mark Carney government simply promises to throw still more money at the problem – showing itself to be as deluded and dogmatic as those who went before.

“Owe Canada”: Our Nation’s Looming Fiscal Abyss

For anyone who still bought into Mark Carney’s self-declared image as the great global banker who would responsibly manage Canada’s finances, his recent promise to juice defence spending to 5 percent of GDP – $155 billion per year in today’s dollars – must surely be the final straw. The Liberal Prime Minister had already announced massive spending hikes and a huge deficit, with interest on the federal debt to hit $70 billion by 2029. All this will spell doom for a country already struggling with declining productivity, zero growth and a falling standard of living, concludes Gwyn Morgan. The veteran business leader charts Canada’s path to budgetary disaster and places the blame squarely where it belongs – on Canada’s profligate Prime Minister.

Restoring Canada Special Series
Part II: Carney’s Energy Policy and the Fragile Canadian Economy

“Meet the new boss/Same as the old boss,” The Who’s Pete Townshend wrote back in 1971. Words that today might well apply to Mark Carney. Canada’s new Liberal Prime Minister says he wants to make Canada a “conventional and clean energy superpower”, and suddenly seems to support new oil and natural gas pipelines. But Gwyn Morgan, who devoted years as a CEO to defending Canada’s oil and natural gas industry, doesn’t buy it. Carney, he notes, spent years abroad on an ever-more-strident net-zero quest, and recently said he’s keeping his predecessor’s oil and gas emissions cap in place. In this incisive critique, Morgan takes the measure of the new PM and finds that the prospects of restoring the Canadian economy have dimmed further.