There’s little for conservatives and libertarians to cheer in recent Canadian Supreme Court rulings, but Peter J. Wallison writes in Law & Liberty how two cases have quietly made their way to the United States Supreme Court that pose a threat to the legal authority enjoyed by the federal administrative state over the last 100 years.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


