The current domination of feelings in our workplaces and social institutions, writes the pseudonymous “Lomez” in First Things, has coincided with the expansion of massive “HR” bureaucracies – largely led and shaped by women. The resulting focus on safety and risk-aversion has fuelled related obsessions like “trigger warnings” and “microaggressions” – and even helped drive governments’ response to the pandemic.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


