Stories

The other name for “profiling”: Smart detective work

Mark Milke
January 14, 2010
The quickest way through security for everyone is if airport staff are allowed to practice quick detective work. Profiling is a reality. We might as well admit it, collectively lighten up a bit, and thus get through security quicker.
Stories

The other name for “profiling”: Smart detective work

Mark Milke
January 14, 2010
The quickest way through security for everyone is if airport staff are allowed to practice quick detective work. Profiling is a reality. We might as well admit it, collectively lighten up a bit, and thus get through security quicker.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

We live in an age of equality where everyone wants to be treated the same. It’s the desirable legacy of a centuries-long march to see all people practice their God-given inherent freedoms. It’s an ethos that values merit and character above religion, skin colour, or other factors of little use in deciding job suitability, university admissions or who’s fit for political office.

 

But no principle can be applied unthinkingly without exception. We also live in a time of too-easy terrorism, where killing hundreds or thousands can occur in a snap-second.

 

That second reality means it’s overdue for security selectivity in our nation’s airports. Some call that “profiling” and equate it with discrimination. There’s another name for it: smart detective work.

 

Only in North America do we maintain the fiction profiling doesn’t occur. But it does. In 2005, I was in Toronto for an Israel-bound flight. There were several obvious layers of security specific to the El Al check-in but the process was relatively speedy. Had I been a young male from Yemen, I’d have been asked a few extra questions and likely pulled aside.

 

For my flight back to Canada, at Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv, vehicles must stop at an outer perimeter far from the terminal building. Once through, more screening takes place, including opened luggage searched by hand with plenty of questions from young but intense security agents. I felt safer at Ben Gurion than anyone with a sense of awareness would at our airports, where we bunch up in “security” line-ups that crawl—perfect, slow-moving targets.

 

Sometimes the profiling is more obvious. In December 2008, on a Casablanca-Calgary flight I was on with a Frankfurt connection, a police car arrived on the tarmac to inspect departing passengers. The police were there to prevent anyone who might have dumped identification during the flight then claiming asylum. So before anyone could descend the stairs, the police first looked for and then at passports. Except that as a pale male with blue eyes and obviously not Moroccan, the German cops waved me through without even a cursory glance at my identification.

 

The Israeli process is intense and German screening might offend but both are efficient for everyone, profiled or not. It beats North American airports where our legitimate aspirations for social and political equality is mistakenly applied to what is in effect airport police work, and where not all approach the terminal, airplane or cockpit with equal and benign intentions.

 

And so we pretend everyone is a potentially equal threat. Except that my 79-year old mother, a Sikh grandfather with his brood of grandchildren and a Japanese student carrying a Hello Kitty backpack pose the same likelihood of harm: zero. To make-believe otherwise is akin to expecting police investigating a mugging to assume everyone in the vicinity is a suspect, even after the victim tells them it was a teenage male with a facial scar. But the pretence as applied to airports is why we’re now supposed to show up three (!) hours early for flights, get as naked as possible and store “unnecessary” expensive and fragile laptops and cameras in checked luggage. As if.

 

Regrettably for young males of Middle Eastern origin, much terrorism has sprung from that cohort. Hopefully, few make the error of assuming that because most terrorists in the last decade were young Muslim males, that most young Muslim males are therefore terrorists. The former description is a factual observation albeit with exceptions; the latter assumption is a logical fallacy.

 

I grant that profiling is irritating if one receives the extra screening, but the quickest way through security for everyone is if airport staff are allowed to practice quick detective work.

 

Besides, it’s not as if profiling is only ever negative for non-Caucasians. In my trip to Morocco, a Casablanca carpet dealer profiled me perfectly. I only found out how much I overpaid for two carpets long after I left his shop and was back in Calgary.

 

Profiling is a reality. We might as well admit it, collectively lighten up a bit, and thus get through security quicker.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Ultimate Green-Washing: how LEED certification raises construction costs and worsens housing affordability while sidelining genuinely sustainable architecture.

The Ultimate Green-Washing: The False Promise of LEED Certification

Builders, developers and politicians have all avidly pursued LEED certification of major buildings and housing over the past several decades. Meant to be the pinnacle of “green” construction standards, LEED demands not just energy efficiency but the pursuit of many nakedly ideological goals like public transit use and even social equity. And its effects go far beyond virtue signalling and woke positioning. As this investigation by engineer Greg Wilson reveals, not only does LEED certification drive up construction costs and make housing affordability even more problematic, but buildings constructed to display its contradictory desires often consume more energy than traditional ones. Wilson calls for a return to sanity and a true form of sustainability: buildings that work well and will last for centuries.

B’nai Brith Canada and other Jewish groups back Canada’s “anti-hate” laws, including the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act – a bet on state power that Ezra Levant and John Carpay warn will backfire.

Misplaced Faith: Why B’nai Brith Canada and Other Jewish Groups Should Oppose “Anti-hate” Laws

That free speech has been fundamental to Judaism for over 3,000 years is especially admirable considering the innumerable anti-Semitic attacks that uncontrolled public discourse has emboldened over the centuries. The courage it takes to defend that principle in present-day Canada is beginning to fray, however, as prominent Jewish organizations like B’nai Brith Canada are backing Ottawa’s recurring expansion of “anti-hate” laws – most recently with the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act. But such legislative cudgels never work, writes Lynne Cohen in this originally reported essay – and often end up being used to batter their original proponents. Seeking safety behind the power of the state, Cohen argues, is exactly the wrong approach. Free speech can be messy, unpleasant – and very hard to extend to one’s enemies – but the alternative is far worse.

“First One to Shine”: Reflections on My Indian Residential School Experience

If you want to learn the truth about a time and place, it would make sense to ask some of those who were there. In this heartfelt memoir, Elaine Ayoungman Clifton, who was born into the Siksika First Nation near Calgary, tells a story today’s activists don’t want you to hear. Far from an instrument of repression and evil, the Indian Residential School she attended for a decade was warm and welcoming, the teachers caring and conscientious. They instilled in her a love of reading, did not try to crush her language and culture, and did not try to separate her from her large family. “I am grateful for what they taught me and the care, friendship and love they gave to me over many years,” Ayoungman Clifton writes. If Canadians really want to respect the lived experience of all Indigenous people, hers is an authentic voice we should listen to.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.