Stories

The kids are alright?

Chris Schafer
April 23, 2013
Stories

The kids are alright?

Chris Schafer
April 23, 2013
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

“The kids are alright”. While a popular title of a 2010 movie where the children of lesbian mothers, conceived by artificial insemination, bring their father into their family life, the kids may be anything but alright today. News of Rehtaeh Parsons’ suicide after an alleged gang rape and the ongoing harassment at the finger tips of kids her age as they texted naked photos of her around the community, following on the heels as it was of other well publicized similar international incidents, seems to suggest something is afoul.

In this issue, Barbara Kay, weekly columnist for the National Post newspaper, argues that, “It is an infallible rule of human nature that appetites ungoverned by moral boundaries will feed on themselves and metastasize uncontrollably”. The result may very well be, among other things, the pervasiveness of pornography and the hook-up culture on university and college campuses that we hear so much about lately and that is reflected in the popular culture of today.

This theme is explored further in the book review of “The End of Men” by Kathryn Marshall, who points out how Rosin’s book argues that women have a newfound power and control in their sexual lives where they are free to date and “hook up” without the pressure of being nailed down to the institution of marriage or a relationship even.

The same feminist movements of the 1960s that Marshall’s book review explores, which pushed women out of the home and into the workplace, which has contributed in part to the breakdown in teenager morality as Barbara Kay would no doubt argue, is being institutionalized in law.

Lawyer Derek James From explores a recent seminal court decision that is lock step in line with the prevailing attitude that family and child rearing are responsibilities of society and not those of families themselves. Now, women (and men) have a right to a job that fit the time constraints of their personal family lives, while employers and co-workers are expected to shoulder some of the burden of what was previously seen to be the responsibility of individual families themselves. In short, From explores why it shouldn’t take a community to raise your kid and why the government won’t do anything about it.

All the while, the crumbling institution of marriage, subject to ever declining enrolment, was opened up to homosexual men and women in Canada and most recently in New Zealand. Many argue, including Simon Fraser University professor Doug Allen in this issue, that same sex marriage has changed the legal and social meaning of marriage in ways never anticipated. The results for Allen demonstrate that the children of same sex marriages are not doing as well in terms of education as children of opposite sex married parents. It may very well be time to revisit the “one size fits all” notion of marriage and allow marriages of the same sex variety to evolve on their own terms.

In this issue of C2C journal, all of these issues and others, are on the table. Even for the most liberal of readers, it promises to make you question whether in fact the kids are alright?

Chris Schafer, C2C Journal Issue Editor

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

More from this author

Interview: Iain T. Benson

An interview with Iain T. Benson, Senior Associate Counsel, Miller Thomson LLP, and former Executive Director, Centre for Cultural Renewal in Ottawa, Ontario, conducted November 10 th , 2009.