Glenn H. Reynolds in the New York Post suggests a new way of countering misinformation: instead of elites “protecting” the rest of society through censorship against ideas they deem dangerous, why not reduce the powers held by big businesses, big universities and big governments. That is because, writes Reynolds, their influence is all-too easily bought and they absorb – and circulate – the opposite of the truth.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


