Accused criminals are still to be considered innocent until proven guilty…by the tip of a nose, apparently. In Science, Peter Andrey Smith charts the concerning courtroom trend wherein cases are being decided and defendants sent to prison not on the merit of physical evidence but according to a smell test administered by man’s best friend.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


