As of August 2021, 330,000 academic articles involving over one million different authors had been published on Covid-19. But instead of pushing the boundaries of knowledge, all this attention is actually undermining the principles of good science, says scholar John P. A. Ioaniddis. Writing in Tablet, Ioaniddis explains how the politics of the pandemic is eroding scientific skepticism.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


