The Spectator’s Daniel J. Flynn describes the free speech battle being waged between Elon Musk’s Twitter and corporate heavy-weight Apple. “The powerful few want to impede the free flow of information to the vulnerable many,” he writes. Canadians will recognize a similar fight over tech-based freedoms in Bill C-11.

Keeping the AI Apocalypse at Bay
Writing in City Journal, Judge Glock examines legal efforts to control AI and dismisses the current fixation on suing for specific harms, such as bad advice. “The idea that we should treat Big Tech, including AI companies, like we treated Big Tobacco, is exactly the wrong idea,” he observes. A better approach is to assess product liability based on which parties can perform the task at the cheapest cost, as is the case with the regulation of medical equipment. This “has the benefit of putting the onus on companies themselves to game out dangerous scenarios and prevent them,” he advises. For more on AI, see this C2C article.


