Stories

How the NDP can win the next Alberta election

Colin Craig
May 14, 2015
The bitter enmity between Wildrose Conservatives and Progressive Conservatives in Alberta is perfectly understandable. Both sides blame the other for the shocking election of an NDP majority government on Orange Tuesday, May 5. Terrible things were said and done on both sides during the 2012 election campaign. Wildrose effectively destroyed two PC leaders, and the PCs stole a Wildrose leader, plus half their caucus. But both sides need to think hard about what’s at stake, writes Colin Craig, a conservative refugee from 16 years of NDP government in Manitoba who recently moved to Alberta. If small-c conservatives fail to overcome their differences, put the past behind them, and unite in a single party, he says, the NDP may get two terms to monkeywrench Alberta’s economy.
Stories

How the NDP can win the next Alberta election

Colin Craig
May 14, 2015
The bitter enmity between Wildrose Conservatives and Progressive Conservatives in Alberta is perfectly understandable. Both sides blame the other for the shocking election of an NDP majority government on Orange Tuesday, May 5. Terrible things were said and done on both sides during the 2012 election campaign. Wildrose effectively destroyed two PC leaders, and the PCs stole a Wildrose leader, plus half their caucus. But both sides need to think hard about what’s at stake, writes Colin Craig, a conservative refugee from 16 years of NDP government in Manitoba who recently moved to Alberta. If small-c conservatives fail to overcome their differences, put the past behind them, and unite in a single party, he says, the NDP may get two terms to monkeywrench Alberta’s economy.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Refugee Camp

One of several darkly satirical photo illustrations that began circulating in Alberta soon after the NDP victory.

 

The day after the NDP swept to power in Alberta the TSX dropped by over 150 points, largely due to instability in Canadian energy stocks.

The CEO of Bonterra Energy has already indicated they’re reconsidering investments in Alberta and investment guru Kevin O’Leary compared the NDP’s victory to a “horror movie unfolding.”

The end results of destructive NDP policies are well known; their party has left a trail of economic carnage across Canada. One can imagine the damage they could cause not only to Alberta’s economy, but right across our great country.

If that scares you, know that something even worse could happen: the re-election of an NDP government in Alberta.

I write this column as someone who endured much of the NDP’s current 16-year run in Manitoba. While the NDP are quite inept at governing, readers should know they’ve become quite skilled at rhetoric, media manipulation and bullying opponents. As you read this column, NDP apparatchiks from Manitoba and other parts of the country are polishing their resumes and making the pilgrimage to Edmonton.

While Notley will have many rookie MLAs in her caucus, her team will include several veterans including long-time federal NDP boss Brian Topp as chief of staff. Conservatives cannot count on Premier Rachel Notley and crew to simply fall apart and wait for the Wildrose or Progressive Conservatives to pick up the pieces.

That of course begs the question – how can grassroots conservative-minded activists prevent multiple NDP terms?

In my opinion, we need a single, credible alternative to the NDP in Alberta.

After moving to Alberta earlier this year, I learned that former colleagues from Gary Filmon’s PC government (Manitoba) and Mike Harris’s PC government (Ontario) were busy helping out the PC Party of Alberta. Several new colleagues and friends were also involved on the PC campaign as well. This news contradicted what I had been told previously: “all the real conservatives left the PCs.”

On the Wildrose side, a former colleague (Derek Fildebrandt) was elected as an MLA and plenty of other friends and colleagues were helping the party in various capacities.

As an outsider, the situation didn’t make much sense at all – it reminded me of the old Reform (and subsequently Canadian Alliance) split with the federal Tories back in the day.

I understand why the split occurred in Alberta – I don’t agree with many of the decisions by the PC government in the last several years either. However, in my opinion, now is not the time to dwell on the past, but to learn from it and work together at building a united small ‘c’ conservative alternative. Based on the people I know in both camps, it’s obvious to me there’s more that unites us than divides us.

Without a doubt, mistakes were made when Danielle Smith and several Wildrose MLAs crossed the floor in what was positioned as a merger. The impulse to unite the right is sound, but it has to be done through a democratic process. Wildrose supporters are still understandably upset about what happened. However, isn’t the risk of a two-term NDP government a good reason to let go of the past?

Some Wildrose supporters seem to be counting on the PCs to simply ‘wither away on the vine,’ leading to a single alternative to the NDP. Some PCers still seem to think they have a divine right to govern. However, hoping your opponent self-destructs is not a plan by any stretch of the imagination.

One can’t ignore the fact that Alberta’s PC Party earned 28 percent of the popular vote in the recent election; four percent more than the Wildrose Party. Despite all the damage the PC brand endured during the Redford era, the ‘time for change’ mood, and some recent gaffes by Jim Prentice, 28 percent of voters still voted PC – incredible brand loyalty under the circumstances.

The party also has loyal donors, volunteers and a toehold in urban constituencies. To count the PCs out at this point is premature. Even if the PCs only earn 15 percent of the vote in the next election, it would still likely be enough to split the vote and lead to a second NDP term.

It also cannot be ignored that the combined vote of the PCs and Wildrose in the recent election would have been enough to unseat 26 new NDP MLAs. I realize the math for such mergers is never that easy, but the electoral results coming from the federal merger speak for themselves.

To be sure, the Wildrose Party deserves credit for their efforts as an effective opposition party and their remarkable comeback after losing their leader due to floor-crossing last December. However, we should all reflect on the reality that Albertans chose the NDP to form the next government and not the Wildrose. Perhaps the Wildrose still requires another election cycle or two to reverse the negative first impression they left after some erratic comments by candidates in the 2012 election? Who knows? That’s not a gamble I want to take; time is of the essence. In fact, we may see the consequences of conservative division yet again in the Calgary Foothills by-election later this year.

The barbarians have breached the gates and are now in a position to throw socialist wrenches into the gears of Canada’s economic engine. Albertans can’t afford two terms with the NDP while squabbles continue at the grassroots level. For that matter, Canada can’t afford it either.

~

Colin Craig served as the Canadian Taxpayers Federation’s Prairie Director for seven years in Winnipeg and currently works for the Manning Centre in Calgary.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Canada’s Other Productivity Crisis: The Daily Irritants That Slow Us Down and Sap Our Spirit

Multi-factor verification. Customer surveys. SMS alerts. Endless online check-ins. Technology was supposed to free up our time for better things. Instead, it has created endless obstacles to getting anything done. Plus there’s the constant impact of government regulations and questionable safety measures that further rob us of our valuable time. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the absurd and annoying ways that 21st-century life ties us up and grinds us down. While some examples seem faintly comical, taken together they comprise what Taylor argues is a micro-productivity crisis of national proportions that is no laughing matter.

A Mess and Minefield: Ottawa’s Clarity Act on Provincial Separation is Anything but Clear

Proponents of independence for Alberta seem to believe the federal Clarity Act provides a sure pathway to secession should they win a referendum vote. But as Jim Mason and George Koch explain, the Act is less pathway than political minefield. It demands a clear question with a clear majority vote – but offers no criteria for either. It provides no instructions on how separation negotiations should proceed, but it does allow other provinces, Indigenous groups and others to intervene. And it assigns virtually all decision-making to Ottawa. It is, Mason and Koch find in the first of this two-part series, a formula not for resolution but deadlock, virtually certain to frustrate any constitutional effort to secede. Almost like it was designed that way.

Bubble-Wrapped World: How Safety Culture Has Destroyed Our Sense of Adventure

Why were our forebears more adventurous than we are today? Was it just that they had more empty space to explore, no GPS or instant communications to keep them safe, no social welfare state to protect them? It’s all that and more, writes Murray Lytle. The derring-do of days past, he argues, sprang from a value system that admired courage and saw risk-taking as a social virtue – even a duty – that could expand knowledge and build a better world as well as protect the nation. Lytle urges our society to shake off its smothering safety culture and rediscover a sense of adventure.

More from this author

Deficits Aren’t the Answer

Should conservatives embrace deficits and debt in order to compete successfully against free-spending progressives? Some voices on the right, contemplating the failure of fiscally conservative platforms in recent elections, say its time to drop the fixation on balanced budgets. Colin Craig pushes back with a plea on behalf future taxpayers: If conservatives won’t protect them, who will?