Stories

The Last Front Page

Paul Bunner
February 23, 2017
The rapidly shrinking newspaper business raises all kinds of questions. What will we wrap fish guts in? How will we light backyard fires? And where will we get reasonably accurate and important stories about what’s going on in our community, our country, and the world? The internet? Where global editor-bots decide what’s news? Where politicians can lie with impunity? Where fake news outsells real news? The short answer is yes. The longer and more encouraging answer is in the Spring edition of C2C Journal, which launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and career newspaperman Paul Stanway’s lament for the ink-stained wretches of yesterday’s news.
Stories

The Last Front Page

Paul Bunner
February 23, 2017
The rapidly shrinking newspaper business raises all kinds of questions. What will we wrap fish guts in? How will we light backyard fires? And where will we get reasonably accurate and important stories about what’s going on in our community, our country, and the world? The internet? Where global editor-bots decide what’s news? Where politicians can lie with impunity? Where fake news outsells real news? The short answer is yes. The longer and more encouraging answer is in the Spring edition of C2C Journal, which launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and career newspaperman Paul Stanway’s lament for the ink-stained wretches of yesterday’s news.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

C2C Journal is primarily an online magazine, although we always print a few copies of each quarterly edition for marketing and archiving purposes. This has been our modus operandi ever since the magazine was founded in 2007. In 2015, after the Journal became part of the Manning Centre, we began printing a thousand copies of the spring edition for distribution at the annual Manning Centre Conference in Ottawa.

The Spring 2017 quarterly edition is titled The Last Front Page for two reasons. First, it proclaims the main theme of the edition, which is about the social and political impacts arising from the collapse of print journalism as audiences and advertisers flock to online news. Second, it announces that this will be the last quarterly edition of C2C Journal.

Now, before our friends start mourning and our critics start celebrating, let me hasten to add that this does not mean the end of the Journal. On the contrary, it marks a new beginning, and part of our own response to the irreversible transition of journalism from print to digital.

Henceforth, instead of the quarterly themed editions, we will publish news stories, essays, commentaries, investigative articles and reviews on a more regular basis, aiming for an overall increase in content, diversity of topics and perspectives, and timeliness. This is basically what we currently do between quarterly editions, expanded to year round. As we transition to a more purely digital product, we plan to experiment with other mediums to explore and express “Ideas That Lead”.

We’ve been considering this for over a year, but the decision was clinched by the tremendous online response to our penultimate quarterly edition, the Winter 2016 magazine titled The New Campus Rebels. C2C’s online audience has been growing impressively in recent years, and we were on track for another big increase in readers for 2016 – until we published the 8,000-word transcript of Jason Tucker and Jason Vandenbeukel’s interview with Jordan Peterson, the University of Toronto psychology professor and a prominent voice in the global pushback against the progressive extremists’ war on reason and freedom of expression.

In a single week, that feature alone attracted almost as many page views as the rest of the year. It ignited reader interest like nothing we’ve ever published before, fueled by reposts and comments on social media, even attracting reprint requests from online journals in Holland and Portugal. Vandenbeukel’s accompanying story about Peterson also did very well, as did Peter Shawn Taylor’s ground-breaking analysis of the regional cost of carbon taxes in Canada (“The Coming National Carbon Tax Gap”), which we published in November. Not only was it one of our best-read pieces of the year, it also became part of policy debate at the subsequent First Ministers’ Climate Summit.

The lesson we took from these successes was that C2C Journal has a great future in online journalism if we are nimble enough to spot stories that excite reader interest, and provide them with fresh information and insight about those stories. That means letting go of the themed quarterly editions, and making our content as timely and topical as possible.

The stories in the Spring 2017 edition certainly fit the bill. The carnage in print and the explosion of online journalism, disseminated through social media and accompanied by robot editors, fake news, and mega-data harvesting, is having profound cultural, political and economic impacts.

Nowhere is the impact more painful, and distressing, than in journalism itself. The death of print is draining the industry of money that pays for much of the investigative reporting we all rely on to know what’s going on. Populist politicians are adding insult to injury by making journalistic bias their whipping boy. Left wing governments are marshalling for intervention. The implications for civil society, and democracy, are ominous and uncertain.

In spite of all this, the preponderance of our stories are hopeful and optimistic that journalism will survive this wrenching transition, and based on our recent successes and the changes we’re making at C2C Journal, there is every reason to believe that this publication, at least, will flourish.

To ensure that will happen, two things need to happen. First, we need a steady stream of lively, interesting, ground-breaking content from established and emerging writers across Canada. One silver lining in the ruin of print journalism is that a wealth of talent is now out of work and available to publications like ours. We invite you to pitch us on anything, anytime, by emailing [email protected].

Second, like everyone else in online journalism, we’re trying to figure out a sustainable business model, and in the mean time we need the voluntary financial support of readers who enjoy and learn from our work, and who understand how important journalism is to the health of our democracy. You can make a donation by visiting www.c2cjournal.ca/donate.

As Alexandra Pope concludes in her excellent essay about fake news in this edition of C2C: “You get what you pay for, as the axiom goes, and if we keep expecting journalists to produce good journalism on demand, for free, eventually all we will be left with is the spectre of our own worst fears.”

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

One Flew Over the Kangaroo Court, Part II: The System Invents its Own Jurisprudence

An encounter with a nearly incomprehensible, seemingly absurd and coldly indifferent judicial body offering no apparent hope of resolution would surely cause most citizens to give up in disgust. Gleb Lisikh is made of different stuff; being patronized and rebuffed only makes him dig harder. In this continuation of his now three-year-long legal Odyssey (Part I can be read here), Lisikh provides a firsthand account of the worsening dysfunction of Canada’s court system – and makes the startling discovery that activist human rights adjudicators are attempting to exclude millions of Ontarians from the protection of the human rights code.

Conservatism’s Greatest Canadian Teacher: What we can Learn from George Grant

Most everyone would agree the political movement led by Pierre Poilievre is not your parents’ Conservative Party. Then again, neither arguably was the government of Stephen Harper. Did the 50s-era populist John Diefenbaker embody “real” conservatism? For that matter, did Sir John A. Macdonald? One man who spent his life struggling to define Canadian conservatism and determine who measured up – and who fell short – was political philosopher George Grant. For Grant, conservatism was rooted in the pushback against the interconnected forces of liberalism, technology and the American superstate. Now, a group of (mostly young) conservatives have taken up the challenge of evaluating whether Grant himself knew what he was talking about, and how his ideas might be applied today. Barry Cooper examines their work.

Malign Neglect: What Calgary’s Water-Main Break Reveals about the Failure of City Government

The rupture of Calgary’s biggest water main revealed more than the problems of aging infrastructure. It showed a civic bureaucracy unable to provide basic services or fix things when they break, and a mayor eager to blame others and scold citizens for their selfishness in wanting city services in return for their tax dollars. Above all, it laid bare the increasing tendency of governments to neglect their core responsibilities in favour of social policy fetishes, and to sidestep accountability when things go wrong. Clear, competent, mission-focused public servants are a vanishing breed, writes George Koch, and governing a city is now mainly about keeping city workers, senior officials and elected politicians happy.

More from this author

Good News From C2C Journal

C2C Journal is pleased to announce that thanks to the loyal and generous support of our readers, contributors and donors, the Journal is immediately increasing volume and frequency of original stories and essays, expanding staff, unveiling a redesigned website, and launching a sustained social media marketing push on multi-media platforms. Editor Paul Bunner has the details.

One step forward, two steps back for freedom

When he wasn’t kayaking on or swimming in the North Saskatchewan River near his home in Edmonton, C2C Journal editor Paul Bunner spent some of his summer fighting two battles for little freedoms in his local community. He won one and lost one. Although he’s a veteran political activist at the federal and provincial level, Bunner contends that the lifeblood of democracy must be nurtured at the foundations of society if it is to flourish at the top.

Situational sexism: Lock her up vs a punch in the face

At an anti-carbon tax rally at the Alberta Legislature in November, the crowd briefly mocked NDP Premier Rachel Notley with the “lock her up” chant that erupted at an Donald Trump campaign rallies whenever he attacked Hillary Clinton. It became a huge story, hailed as evidence that Trumpian sexism was spilling across the border. Last weekend, a young male demonstrator at anti-Trump “Women’s March” rally at the same location punched a female reporter for the right-wing Rebel Media in the face. The media response? Crickets at first, then skepticism. C2C editor Paul Bunner ponders the double standard.

Share This Story

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.