Stories

The Last Front Page

Paul Bunner
February 23, 2017
The rapidly shrinking newspaper business raises all kinds of questions. What will we wrap fish guts in? How will we light backyard fires? And where will we get reasonably accurate and important stories about what’s going on in our community, our country, and the world? The internet? Where global editor-bots decide what’s news? Where politicians can lie with impunity? Where fake news outsells real news? The short answer is yes. The longer and more encouraging answer is in the Spring edition of C2C Journal, which launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and career newspaperman Paul Stanway’s lament for the ink-stained wretches of yesterday’s news.
Stories

The Last Front Page

Paul Bunner
February 23, 2017
The rapidly shrinking newspaper business raises all kinds of questions. What will we wrap fish guts in? How will we light backyard fires? And where will we get reasonably accurate and important stories about what’s going on in our community, our country, and the world? The internet? Where global editor-bots decide what’s news? Where politicians can lie with impunity? Where fake news outsells real news? The short answer is yes. The longer and more encouraging answer is in the Spring edition of C2C Journal, which launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and career newspaperman Paul Stanway’s lament for the ink-stained wretches of yesterday’s news.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

C2C Journal is primarily an online magazine, although we always print a few copies of each quarterly edition for marketing and archiving purposes. This has been our modus operandi ever since the magazine was founded in 2007. In 2015, after the Journal became part of the Manning Centre, we began printing a thousand copies of the spring edition for distribution at the annual Manning Centre Conference in Ottawa.

The Spring 2017 quarterly edition is titled The Last Front Page for two reasons. First, it proclaims the main theme of the edition, which is about the social and political impacts arising from the collapse of print journalism as audiences and advertisers flock to online news. Second, it announces that this will be the last quarterly edition of C2C Journal.

Now, before our friends start mourning and our critics start celebrating, let me hasten to add that this does not mean the end of the Journal. On the contrary, it marks a new beginning, and part of our own response to the irreversible transition of journalism from print to digital.

Henceforth, instead of the quarterly themed editions, we will publish news stories, essays, commentaries, investigative articles and reviews on a more regular basis, aiming for an overall increase in content, diversity of topics and perspectives, and timeliness. This is basically what we currently do between quarterly editions, expanded to year round. As we transition to a more purely digital product, we plan to experiment with other mediums to explore and express “Ideas That Lead”.

We’ve been considering this for over a year, but the decision was clinched by the tremendous online response to our penultimate quarterly edition, the Winter 2016 magazine titled The New Campus Rebels. C2C’s online audience has been growing impressively in recent years, and we were on track for another big increase in readers for 2016 – until we published the 8,000-word transcript of Jason Tucker and Jason Vandenbeukel’s interview with Jordan Peterson, the University of Toronto psychology professor and a prominent voice in the global pushback against the progressive extremists’ war on reason and freedom of expression.

In a single week, that feature alone attracted almost as many page views as the rest of the year. It ignited reader interest like nothing we’ve ever published before, fueled by reposts and comments on social media, even attracting reprint requests from online journals in Holland and Portugal. Vandenbeukel’s accompanying story about Peterson also did very well, as did Peter Shawn Taylor’s ground-breaking analysis of the regional cost of carbon taxes in Canada (“The Coming National Carbon Tax Gap”), which we published in November. Not only was it one of our best-read pieces of the year, it also became part of policy debate at the subsequent First Ministers’ Climate Summit.

The lesson we took from these successes was that C2C Journal has a great future in online journalism if we are nimble enough to spot stories that excite reader interest, and provide them with fresh information and insight about those stories. That means letting go of the themed quarterly editions, and making our content as timely and topical as possible.

The stories in the Spring 2017 edition certainly fit the bill. The carnage in print and the explosion of online journalism, disseminated through social media and accompanied by robot editors, fake news, and mega-data harvesting, is having profound cultural, political and economic impacts.

Nowhere is the impact more painful, and distressing, than in journalism itself. The death of print is draining the industry of money that pays for much of the investigative reporting we all rely on to know what’s going on. Populist politicians are adding insult to injury by making journalistic bias their whipping boy. Left wing governments are marshalling for intervention. The implications for civil society, and democracy, are ominous and uncertain.

In spite of all this, the preponderance of our stories are hopeful and optimistic that journalism will survive this wrenching transition, and based on our recent successes and the changes we’re making at C2C Journal, there is every reason to believe that this publication, at least, will flourish.

To ensure that will happen, two things need to happen. First, we need a steady stream of lively, interesting, ground-breaking content from established and emerging writers across Canada. One silver lining in the ruin of print journalism is that a wealth of talent is now out of work and available to publications like ours. We invite you to pitch us on anything, anytime, by emailing [email protected]

Second, like everyone else in online journalism, we’re trying to figure out a sustainable business model, and in the mean time we need the voluntary financial support of readers who enjoy and learn from our work, and who understand how important journalism is to the health of our democracy. You can make a donation by visiting www.c2cjournal.ca/donate.

As Alexandra Pope concludes in her excellent essay about fake news in this edition of C2C: “You get what you pay for, as the axiom goes, and if we keep expecting journalists to produce good journalism on demand, for free, eventually all we will be left with is the spectre of our own worst fears.”

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Childcare on the Ballot

Political theory suggests that freedom and equity are opposing concepts. Allowing greater individual autonomy is assumed to curtail fairness for the less advantaged, and vice versa. Not so when it comes to the 2021 electoral debate over childcare – one of the few areas of sharp contrast between the two main parties. Peter Shawn Taylor takes a close look at the Liberals’ proposed national childcare system and the Conservatives’ refundable childcare tax credit and finds one option delivers not only greater choice for all parents, but superior support for low-income families as well as the promise of new spaces.

The Sins of Our Fathers

The past few months have shown there’s no shortage of people willing to hurl accusations, issue demands and unleash uncontrolled emotions. Such tactics have flooded political life in our age. By contrast, lowering the emotional temperature, proposing a reasonable way out of the mess and driving toward a real resolution are in short supply. In the third and final instalment of C2C’s three-part series on unmarked graves at former Indian Residential Schools (Part 1 can be read here and Part 2 can be read here), Gourav Jaswal examines how other countries have faced the challenge of national reconciliation, then charts a path for Canada to take.

The Case for the Classics in Alberta’s New K-6 School Curriculum

Kids are heading back to school – much to the relief of millions of parents – but in Alberta they are marching back to a curriculum and teaching mindset bearing the imprint of the previous NDP government’s “progressive” ideology, including the virtual erasure of history. It is an open question whether the current UCP government’s controversial education reforms will proceed. Student Lucas Robertson, for his part, hopes that they do. Robertson has loved classical history since before he began elementary school, and he sees rightness, truth, valid purpose and even beauty in Alberta’s plan to teach today’s kids about ancient people and events. Parents across Canada take note, for the outcome in Alberta could have national implications.

More from this author

Good News From C2C Journal

C2C Journal is pleased to announce that thanks to the loyal and generous support of our readers, contributors and donors, the Journal is immediately increasing volume and frequency of original stories and essays, expanding staff, unveiling a redesigned website, and launching a sustained social media marketing push on multi-media platforms. Editor Paul Bunner has the details.

One step forward, two steps back for freedom

When he wasn’t kayaking on or swimming in the North Saskatchewan River near his home in Edmonton, C2C Journal editor Paul Bunner spent some of his summer fighting two battles for little freedoms in his local community. He won one and lost one. Although he’s a veteran political activist at the federal and provincial level, Bunner contends that the lifeblood of democracy must be nurtured at the foundations of society if it is to flourish at the top.

Situational sexism: Lock her up vs a punch in the face

At an anti-carbon tax rally at the Alberta Legislature in November, the crowd briefly mocked NDP Premier Rachel Notley with the “lock her up” chant that erupted at an Donald Trump campaign rallies whenever he attacked Hillary Clinton. It became a huge story, hailed as evidence that Trumpian sexism was spilling across the border. Last weekend, a young male demonstrator at anti-Trump “Women’s March” rally at the same location punched a female reporter for the right-wing Rebel Media in the face. The media response? Crickets at first, then skepticism. C2C editor Paul Bunner ponders the double standard.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.