Stories

Did Canada’s first immigrants fall from the sky?

C2C Journal
June 28, 2017
Aboriginal grievance and entitlement stories made a lot of news in Canada in June. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau renamed National Aboriginal Day as National Indigenous Peoples Day. He also renamed his office to erase its historic link to Hector Langevin, an architect of the residential schools system. And he gave the old American embassy in Ottawa to native groups. Still aboriginal activists weren’t satisfied. So they badgered an apology out of Governor General David Johnston for calling First Nations peoples immigrants. Which left the author of this story wondering, where on or off earth do these insatiably aggrieved activists come from?
Stories

Did Canada’s first immigrants fall from the sky?

C2C Journal
June 28, 2017
Aboriginal grievance and entitlement stories made a lot of news in Canada in June. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau renamed National Aboriginal Day as National Indigenous Peoples Day. He also renamed his office to erase its historic link to Hector Langevin, an architect of the residential schools system. And he gave the old American embassy in Ottawa to native groups. Still aboriginal activists weren’t satisfied. So they badgered an apology out of Governor General David Johnston for calling First Nations peoples immigrants. Which left the author of this story wondering, where on or off earth do these insatiably aggrieved activists come from?
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

The Oxford English dictionary defines the adjective “indigenous” as “originating or occurring naturally in a particular place; native.” Leaving aside the Eurocentrism of the OED, the plain meaning of the word as it applies to Canadians who claim North American Indian, aboriginal, First Nations, or indigenous racial status is that they, through the ancestors, have occupied the northern half of North America since the dawn of creation. As CBC broadcaster and self-described “advocate, pop culture philosopher and Ojibwe dude” Jesse Wente emphatically put it in a tweet last week: “We. Have. Been. Here. Forever”.

Wente’s proclamation of eternal aboriginal occupation of Canada was one of the howls of outrage that echoed across the Twitterverse after  Governor General David Johnston told a CBC interviewer that “we’re a country based on immigration going right back to our, quote, indigenous people, unquote, who were immigrants as well, 10, 12, 14 thousand years ago.”

A few days later, while presiding over a ceremony in Ottawa to pay homage to “Outstanding Indigenous Leadership”, Johnston responded to the criticism with an apology “for not expressing myself correctly on this matter recently. Indigenous peoples are the original peoples of this land.” He elaborated on Twitter, saying “I want to clarify a miscommunication. Our Indigenous peoples are not immigrants. They are the original peoples of this land.”

With all due respect to Ojibwe dude Wente and His Excellency the Governor General, Johnston had it right the first time. Aboriginals did not emerge from nothingness. The preponderance of historical, archeological, linguistic, and genetic evidence indicates that Canada’s aboriginal peoples came from somewhere else. Like all humans, their ultimate ancestors are presumably homo erectus, who first appeared in Africa about two million years ago, and homo sapiens, the modern humans who emerged from either Africa or the Middle East some 200,000 years ago.

No evidence whatsoever exists indicating that some unique offshoot of humanity evolved spontaneously out of the primeval wilderness anywhere in the Americas. There is considerable scientific evidence, however, indicating that some of those long ago Africans migrated east across Asia, where they evolved over tens of thousands of years into the diverse Mongoloid races and cultures we know today, and eventually some of them made their way to the Americas, probably no more than about 30,000 years ago, at most.

No humans, and few organisms of any kind, would have found Canada very hospitable during the last Ice Age – from roughly 100,000 to 10,000 years ago – when most of the country was covered by glaciers. But sea levels dropped with all that water locked in ice, exposing a 1,000 kilometer land bridge across what is now the Bering Sea between Alaska and Siberia. Some adventurous Siberians may have been the first immigrants to Canada, across the bridge, but the archeological evidence of humans in the Americas suggests they immediately headed south to escape the ice, only returning to the north thousands of years later as the glaciers retreated.

There are other theories about how and when the first humans landed in the Americas, including the suggestion that they were unrelated to most of the Amerindians who claim indigenous status today. Archaeological evidence from Chile indicates relation to ancient peoples of the South Pacific, who may have got here by boat. More recently, genetic studies have found similarities between an ancient people of southern Europe and some eastern American aboriginals, lending credence to the theory that Europeans sailed across the Atlantic in primitive boats, hugging the northern ice shelf, millennia before the idea occurred to Columbus et al.

Initial scientific reports following the discovery of the famous “Kennewick Man” skeleton in Washington State in 1996 suggested the 9,000-year-old seemed to have Caucasoid traits. Aboriginal groups fought in court for years to prevent further analysis, but in the end DNA tests showed a kinship with North American Indians – and probably Asians.

Language is another area of research that is shedding new light on the ancestry of the earliest settlers of the Americas. American linguistics experts Mark Sicoli and Gary Holton developed a computer algorithm to analyze similarities in languages and in 2014 they published a study which found striking similarities between North American aboriginal languages and Asian languages. Specifically, they noted that the North American Na-Dene linguistic families (which includes many western Canadian tribal groups) have much in common with the Asian Yaneseian families. Both may be descended from a language that was unique to people who lived on the Bering land bridge for thousands of years.

However varied and uncertain the scientific evidence may be, it’s more plausible than simply “forever”. Yet this is the ultimate justification for claims to separate legal status, land ownership and control, and other race-based entitlements. In the absence of any physical proof whatsoever, the only evidence of eternal indigenous occupation of Canada (and the Americas) lies in aboriginal creation stories.

One of the mostly widely known is the Haudenosaunee Sky Woman story. As recorded by the Canadian Museum of History, it claims that originally there were sky people inhabiting an island in the sky. A pregnant Sky Woman fell through a hole in the sky but was saved by a flock of birds who landed her safely on the back of the Great Turtle, where a nest had been created by water animals like beavers and otters. They build it up to create the earth.

“Turtle’s back becomes Sky Woman’s home and the plants she’s brought down with her from Skyworld, including tobacco and strawberries, are her medicine,” the story continues. “She makes a life for herself and becomes the mother of Haudenosaunee life, as we know it today.”

It is probably safe to assume that neither Governor General Johnston nor most of the people who criticized him for calling aboriginal Canadians immigrants believe the Sky Woman fable any more than they believe that Adam and Eve walked with dinosaurs. But if he, and they, are going to insist indigenous people have been in Canada “forever”, they should try to come up with a credible creation story.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Canada’s Other Productivity Crisis: The Daily Irritants That Slow Us Down and Sap Our Spirit

Multi-factor verification. Customer surveys. SMS alerts. Endless online check-ins. Technology was supposed to free up our time for better things. Instead, it has created endless obstacles to getting anything done. Plus there’s the constant impact of government regulations and questionable safety measures that further rob us of our valuable time. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the absurd and annoying ways that 21st-century life ties us up and grinds us down. While some examples seem faintly comical, taken together they comprise what Taylor argues is a micro-productivity crisis of national proportions that is no laughing matter.

A Mess and Minefield: Ottawa’s Clarity Act on Provincial Separation is Anything but Clear

Proponents of independence for Alberta seem to believe the federal Clarity Act provides a sure pathway to secession should they win a referendum vote. But as Jim Mason and George Koch explain, the Act is less pathway than political minefield. It demands a clear question with a clear majority vote – but offers no criteria for either. It provides no instructions on how separation negotiations should proceed, but it does allow other provinces, Indigenous groups and others to intervene. And it assigns virtually all decision-making to Ottawa. It is, Mason and Koch find in the first of this two-part series, a formula not for resolution but deadlock, virtually certain to frustrate any constitutional effort to secede. Almost like it was designed that way.

Bubble-Wrapped World: How Safety Culture Has Destroyed Our Sense of Adventure

Why were our forebears more adventurous than we are today? Was it just that they had more empty space to explore, no GPS or instant communications to keep them safe, no social welfare state to protect them? It’s all that and more, writes Murray Lytle. The derring-do of days past, he argues, sprang from a value system that admired courage and saw risk-taking as a social virtue – even a duty – that could expand knowledge and build a better world as well as protect the nation. Lytle urges our society to shake off its smothering safety culture and rediscover a sense of adventure.

More from this author

Letter from the Editors:
Happy Canada Day!

Celebrating the fact of one’s country’s existence, its survival through the adversities of history and its positive or uplifting attributes is a fact of life the world over, even in tyrannies and oligarchies. Nearly everyone can find something to love about the place they call home. Yet this is apparently not the case for many inhabitants of present-day Canada, who claim that what was once the self-described “greatest country in the world” has suddenly become a systemically racist hell-hole. Despite such pressure from the woke mob and their elite enablers, however, the editors of C2C Journal find much that is not merely defensible about Canada, but praiseworthy and downright glorious.

The Revolution Eats a Few More of its Own

In 1972 Lou Reed offended conservatives with his hit Walk on the Wild Side, an admiring ode to his transgendered friend Holly, who left Miami as a he and became a she on the way to New York. In 2017 the song has offended progressives as a transphobic example of cultural appropriation. In this article by C2C Staff, the Journal explains what a long, strange trip it’s been from conservative censorship to progressive censorship.