Stories
A Plan for Economic Prosperity
June 22, 2009
With less than a month to go in the federal election, there has been little real debate on the fiscal policies needed to improve Canada’s economic growth and productivity performance. What Canada needs is a fiscal plan focused on economic prosperity that creates and strengthens the incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive economic activity.
Stories

A Plan for Economic Prosperity

June 22, 2009
With less than a month to go in the federal election, there has been little real debate on the fiscal policies needed to improve Canada’s economic growth and productivity performance. What Canada needs is a fiscal plan focused on economic prosperity that creates and strengthens the incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive economic activity.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

With less than a month to go in the federal election, there has been little real debate on the fiscal policies needed to improve Canada’s economic growth and productivity performance. What Canada needs is a fiscal plan focused on economic prosperity that creates and strengthens the incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive economic activity.

First and foremost, a prosperity-based fiscal plan would control the growth of federal spending. Consider that since the federal government balanced its books in 1997/98, program spending has increased by an average of 5.9 per cent per year, faster than the average rate of economic growth at 5.7 per cent.

In recent years, the federal government’s spending problem has worsened. For example, federal program spending increased by an average of 7.1 per cent annually under Prime Minister Paul Martin (2003/04 to 2005/06). Since 2005/06, the Conservative government has increased program spending by an average of 7.2 per cent per year. This from a government that promised to hold spending increases to the annual rate of population plus inflation growth, just 3.1 per cent year since 2005/06.

Whoever forms the next government must apply the brakes to spending in order to create the fiscal room needed to provide tax relief.

This brings us to the second essential ingredient of a prosperity-based fiscal plan: promoting investment, hard work, risk taking and entrepreneurship through tax relief that changes incentives.

The key to improving incentives for productive behaviour is reducing marginal tax rates, the rate people and businesses pay on the last dollar of income earned. To that end, Canada’s next federal government should:

Reduce middle and upper personal income tax rates

Canada maintains among the highest marginal personal income tax rates on middle and upper income earners among the G7 countries. The new federal government should reduce the personal income tax burden on middle and upper income Canadians to harness the productive energies of skilled workers, business owners and entrepreneurs across the country.

Regardless of the specific proposal, the federal government’s aim should be to move toward a single-rate personal income tax. A good first step would be to eliminate the middle two personal income tax brackets, and reduce the top rate from 29 per cent to 25 per cent. Incomes between the basic personal exemption ($9,600) and $150,000 would be taxed at 15 per cent and income over $150,000 would be taxed at 25 per cent.

Eliminate the Capital Gains Tax

The capital gains tax is one of the most damaging taxes in Canada. It encourages the owners of capital to hold on to their investments and prevents them from taking advantage of more profitable investment opportunities. In addition, capital gains taxation has a detrimental impact on entrepreneurship by reducing the return that entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and other investors receive from risk-taking, innovation, and work effort. For these reasons, the federal government should eliminate the taxation of capital gains.

Reduce the Corporate Income Tax

The new federal government should build on the corporate income tax cuts implemented by the Conservative government in October 2007 — the reduction in corporate income tax rates to 15 per cent over the next four years. Despite these reductions, Canada’s marginal effective tax rate on investment will still be the 10th highest among OECD countries in 2012.

Specifically, the new government should further reduce the corporate income tax rate from 15 per cent to 11 per cent by 2012. Doing so would eliminate the difference between the small business tax rate (11 per cent in 2008) and the general corporate income tax rate. As a number of studies have shown, the enormous increase in the tax rate borne by businesses as they grow results in a significant barrier to growth.

Facilitate the harmonization of provincial sales taxes with the GST

The federal government should facilitate the harmonization of provincial sales taxes with the GST in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, and Prince Edward Island. Harmonization with the GST would exempt business inputs from provincial sales taxes, reduce the marginal effective tax rate on investment and improve the incentives for business to invest in productivity enhancing machinery and equipment.

Eliminate the capital tax on financial institutions

While the federal government has completely phased-out the general corporate capital tax, a sector-specific capital tax remains on financial institutions. These capital taxes artificially penalize firms in the financial services sector and raise costs for anyone using financial services. The federal government should eliminate the capital tax on financial institutions. It is a counter-productive public policy to maintain this tax distortion on an industry that is a large employer of Canadians and in an area with very mobile capital resources.

Canada needs a fiscal plan aimed at improving our economic performance. A prosperity-based plan would decrease the size of government and reduce taxes to provide the necessary incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive activities. Such a plan would result in higher levels of investment, increased productivity and higher incomes; benefits all Canadians can enjoy.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Absent Minded: Ontario Tackles the School Attendance Crisis

Canadian schools have a problem – kids aren’t showing up. In Ontario, nearly 60 percent of high school students aren’t meeting the provincial standard for attendance. And Canada leads the world in absenteeism among children of university-educated parents. Yet when Ontario’s education minister announced he was getting tough on truancy, he was hammered from all sides, including “progressive” academics, conservative education reformers, sports parents and, of course, always-angry teachers’ unions. Christina Park looks into the causes of absenteeism and compares Ontario’s reforms to what various other countries are also trying to do about it. As Park explains, nothing can be fixed in Canada’s chaotic school systems until students start showing up for class.

Continental Grift: Why the Liberal Government’s Fixation with Europe Is a Sham

Market diversification is a sensible enough strategy for Canada, but Mark Carney’s fixation on closer ties with Europe is anything but. For one thing, argues business veteran Gwyn Morgan, we’ve already got comprehensive free trade deals with virtually all of Europe. Cozying up further to a dysfunctional, declining EU is pure folly. Far better for the Carney government to focus on Canada’s own self-inflicted economic problems – inflation, taxes, public debt, the disastrous drought in foreign investment. Oh, and the ongoing lack of free trade within our own borders. No need for overseas adventures, notes Morgan; there’s plenty of work to be done at home.

New Man, Same Old Plan: Mark Carney’s Net-Zero Ambitions Remain an Existential Threat to Canada’s Economy

To many Canadians, Mark Carney’s apparent transition from climate-change zealot to build-baby-build capitalist has been a surprising though welcome change. But is it real? Recent evidence suggests the prime minister has not abandoned his longstanding fixation with growth-killing net-zero commitments. Exhibit A is his government’s sustainable investment guidelines. Also known as the “green taxonomy”, this little-known effort seeks to label every development project in the country according to its perceived environmental impact, with the goal of directing where banks and investors are allowed to put their money – and punishing industries deemed unworthy. If not abandoned or watered-down soon, warns industry expert Gina Pappano, the green taxonomy will crush economic growth and cripple the current resurgence in Canada’s vital natural resources sector.

More from this author