Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Former Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe has said goodbye to politics.  After Montreal’s La Presse reported how the Bloc Québécois broke parliamentary rules by paying its party’s general manager out of House of Commons funds for seven years, Duceppe said he would devote himself full-time to “defending my integrity and re-establishing my reputation.” The allegations made it “impossible to envision a return to active politics,” said Duceppe. That means he won’t run for the leadership of Quebec’s Parti Québécois, a Crown that everyone knew he wanted and thought he deserved instead of the current party boss, Pauline Marois.

If Duceppe does actually leave Canadian politics for good, so much the better. Separatists have been costly for Canada and Duceppe was a too-effective advocate for that cause. He even obtained—only in Canada—the official opposition post in Parliament between 1993 and 1997.

Of related note to his time in federal politics, Duceppe’s personal federal pension for his years of “service” in Ottawa is $140,765 annually according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. That’s expensive but of more importance, symbolic of the fiscal damage wrought upon the country’s fabric.

The cost to Quebec of separatist chatter has been decades of lost investment, migration of talent out of the province, and public policy within the province that focused on linguistic battles as opposed to fixing Quebec Inc. The cost to Canada has been instability when we could least afford it: think of the 1995 referendum that took place just as Canada was recovering from the sluggish early 1990s.

One doubts this will happen, but perhaps Duceppe will have a quiet retirement in Florida where his hard-left policies (he was a Marxist until his thirties and never broke from that mindset) and his break-up-Canada troublemaking might finally fade into Florida sunsets.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Ultimate Green-Washing: how LEED certification raises construction costs and worsens housing affordability while sidelining genuinely sustainable architecture.

The Ultimate Green-Washing: The False Promise of LEED Certification

Builders, developers and politicians have all avidly pursued LEED certification of major buildings and housing over the past several decades. Meant to be the pinnacle of “green” construction standards, LEED demands not just energy efficiency but the pursuit of many nakedly ideological goals like public transit use and even social equity. And its effects go far beyond virtue signalling and woke positioning. As this investigation by engineer Greg Wilson reveals, not only does LEED certification drive up construction costs and make housing affordability even more problematic, but buildings constructed to display its contradictory desires often consume more energy than traditional ones. Wilson calls for a return to sanity and a true form of sustainability: buildings that work well and will last for centuries.

B’nai Brith Canada and other Jewish groups back Canada’s “anti-hate” laws, including the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act – a bet on state power that Ezra Levant and John Carpay warn will backfire.

Misplaced Faith: Why B’nai Brith Canada and Other Jewish Groups Should Oppose “Anti-hate” Laws

That free speech has been fundamental to Judaism for over 3,000 years is especially admirable considering the innumerable anti-Semitic attacks that uncontrolled public discourse has emboldened over the centuries. The courage it takes to defend that principle in present-day Canada is beginning to fray, however, as prominent Jewish organizations like B’nai Brith Canada are backing Ottawa’s recurring expansion of “anti-hate” laws – most recently with the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act. But such legislative cudgels never work, writes Lynne Cohen in this originally reported essay – and often end up being used to batter their original proponents. Seeking safety behind the power of the state, Cohen argues, is exactly the wrong approach. Free speech can be messy, unpleasant – and very hard to extend to one’s enemies – but the alternative is far worse.

“First One to Shine”: Reflections on My Indian Residential School Experience

If you want to learn the truth about a time and place, it would make sense to ask some of those who were there. In this heartfelt memoir, Elaine Ayoungman Clifton, who was born into the Siksika First Nation near Calgary, tells a story today’s activists don’t want you to hear. Far from an instrument of repression and evil, the Indian Residential School she attended for a decade was warm and welcoming, the teachers caring and conscientious. They instilled in her a love of reading, did not try to crush her language and culture, and did not try to separate her from her large family. “I am grateful for what they taught me and the care, friendship and love they gave to me over many years,” Ayoungman Clifton writes. If Canadians really want to respect the lived experience of all Indigenous people, hers is an authentic voice we should listen to.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.