Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Stories

An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu

Mark Milke
January 25, 2012
An expensive Quebec separatist says adieu. C2C Journal’s Mark Milke argues it’s long overdue….
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Former Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe has said goodbye to politics.  After Montreal’s La Presse reported how the Bloc Québécois broke parliamentary rules by paying its party’s general manager out of House of Commons funds for seven years, Duceppe said he would devote himself full-time to “defending my integrity and re-establishing my reputation.” The allegations made it “impossible to envision a return to active politics,” said Duceppe. That means he won’t run for the leadership of Quebec’s Parti Québécois, a Crown that everyone knew he wanted and thought he deserved instead of the current party boss, Pauline Marois.

If Duceppe does actually leave Canadian politics for good, so much the better. Separatists have been costly for Canada and Duceppe was a too-effective advocate for that cause. He even obtained—only in Canada—the official opposition post in Parliament between 1993 and 1997.

Of related note to his time in federal politics, Duceppe’s personal federal pension for his years of “service” in Ottawa is $140,765 annually according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation. That’s expensive but of more importance, symbolic of the fiscal damage wrought upon the country’s fabric.

The cost to Quebec of separatist chatter has been decades of lost investment, migration of talent out of the province, and public policy within the province that focused on linguistic battles as opposed to fixing Quebec Inc. The cost to Canada has been instability when we could least afford it: think of the 1995 referendum that took place just as Canada was recovering from the sluggish early 1990s.

One doubts this will happen, but perhaps Duceppe will have a quiet retirement in Florida where his hard-left policies (he was a Marxist until his thirties and never broke from that mindset) and his break-up-Canada troublemaking might finally fade into Florida sunsets.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

A Mess and Minefield: Ottawa’s Clarity Act on Provincial Separation is Anything but Clear

Proponents of independence for Alberta seem to believe the federal Clarity Act provides a sure pathway to secession should they win a referendum vote. But as Jim Mason and George Koch explain, the Act is less pathway than political minefield. It demands a clear question with a clear majority vote – but offers no criteria for either. It provides no instructions on how separation negotiations should proceed, but it does allow other provinces, Indigenous groups and others to intervene. And it assigns virtually all decision-making to Ottawa. It is, Mason and Koch find in the first of this two-part series, a formula not for resolution but deadlock, virtually certain to frustrate any constitutional effort to secede. Almost like it was designed that way.

Bubble-Wrapped World: How Safety Culture Has Destroyed Our Sense of Adventure

Why were our forebears more adventurous than we are today? Was it just that they had more empty space to explore, no GPS or instant communications to keep them safe, no social welfare state to protect them? It’s all that and more, writes Murray Lytle. The derring-do of days past, he argues, sprang from a value system that admired courage and saw risk-taking as a social virtue – even a duty – that could expand knowledge and build a better world as well as protect the nation. Lytle urges our society to shake off its smothering safety culture and rediscover a sense of adventure.

Ego Over Everything: How the Progressive Fixation on Identity Perverts the Arts

Artists once understood they were serving something greater than themselves – truth, beauty, memory – things universal and transcendent. No longer. In a culture where imagination is cast as “cultural appropriation” and exploitation, what matters is not art but the artist. Ego, self-regard and “lived experience” are paramount. In this searing critique, T. G. Kelemen uses recent examples of cancellation in the arts to explain how “progressive” pieties have inverted the very foundation of the arts, fuelling not just a culture war, but a war on culture.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.