Book Review

Hockey, Toronto and Stephen Harper

James R. Coggins
January 26, 2019
The National Women’s Hockey League earlier this week announced it is expanding into Toronto. Stephen Harper’s book, A Great Game: The Forgotten Leafs and the Rise of Professional Hockey, recounts the troubled relationship between Hogtown and pro hockey. For James. R. Coggins, the book’s undeclared subtext is that hockey (and Canada) wins when Toronto loses.
Book Review

Hockey, Toronto and Stephen Harper

James R. Coggins
January 26, 2019
The National Women’s Hockey League earlier this week announced it is expanding into Toronto. Stephen Harper’s book, A Great Game: The Forgotten Leafs and the Rise of Professional Hockey, recounts the troubled relationship between Hogtown and pro hockey. For James. R. Coggins, the book’s undeclared subtext is that hockey (and Canada) wins when Toronto loses.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Stephen Harper’s new book Right Here, Right Now is receiving widespread attention and stirring considerable debate, and deservedly so. It’s a timely commentary on the nationalist-populist uprising against globalization that is so profoundly influencing our politics. His previous book, A Great Game: The Forgotten Leafs and the Rise of Professional Hockey, made far less of a splash when it was published in 2013. Reviewers weren’t sure what to make of it. Libraries didn’t know whether to classify it as a sports book or a political book. Why did Canada’s prime minister write a book about hockey instead of politics? How did he have time to do it while he was running the government?

In the acknowledgements, Harper said he wrote the book because he needed a hobby away from his demanding job. Former PMO staffers recall how, at the end of a long day at work, he would set aside his briefing books, pull out a thick research binder, and tap out a few more pages about hockey history on his laptop. Writing a book is very hard work. It is hard to conceive of doing so for fun or as recreation. Harper’s choice certainly reinforced his image as a serious, work-before-play kind of man, a guy who once said he didn’t have enough personality to go into the family business of accounting.

On the other hand, for those who took the time to read it, A Great Game upset a number of preconceptions. Many people perceived Stephen Harper as someone totally preoccupied with politics. They found it almost incomprehensible that he would devote so much energy and passion to something as frivolous as hockey. Especially since he was, by his own admission, never much of a player himself. He was also considered by many to be a narrow-minded right-winger (in the political sense, not the hockey sense). And yet the book reveals a remarkable sensitivity to social, cultural, and economic issues affecting average people. In many ways, it is more of a social history than a sports chronicle.

Pucks emblazoned with Canada's coat of arms and Stephen Harper's signature were created by staffers as mementoes of his prime ministership.

Although he was born and raised in Toronto, Harper was also often characterized as a dyed-in-the-wool Albertan, a western chauvinist with little understanding of or interest in “Central Canada.” Yet A Great Game is focused on Ontario – Toronto in particular – and Quebec, and reflects prodigious knowledge and understanding of the socio-economic, cultural, and intellectual history of Canada’s largest provinces.

Finally, many liberal intellectuals have tended to dismiss Harper as an intellectual lightweight. Yann Martel, the one-hit novelist (Life of Pi) and former darling of the literati, famously sent dozens of books to the prime minister while he was in office in an evident attempt to expand his mind, or at least get his government to be more generous with arts funding. One can imagine it being puzzling to Martel et al, if they noticed, that Harper could produce a well-researched and well-written volume, in his spare time.

A Great Game traces the development of professional hockey in Canada (as well as the United States), with a strong focus on Toronto. It dwells particularly on the Toronto Professionals, the first Toronto team to play for the Stanley Cup (in 1907, losing to a team from Montreal), and the Toronto Blue Shirts, who won the Cup in 1914. Harper notes with irony that neither of these teams has ever been acknowledged as part of the heritage of the Toronto Maple Leafs, a franchise that hasn’t won the Cup for over half a century.

Harper opens with a long and insightful explanation of the stubborn opposition to the development of professional hockey, in Ontario especially. It certainly seems puzzling in light of the multi-billion-dollar industry we know today. But as Harper explains, at the start of the 20th century sports were considered an activity for upper class young men at upper class schools. Sporting activities were seen as preparation for social leadership, including in war. If hockey players needed to be paid, it meant that they were from the lower classes and therefore should properly be spending their time working rather than playing sports.

This attitude was championed particularly by southern Ontario pseudo-aristocrats of British ancestry. A central figure in Harper’s telling of this story was John Ross Robertson, “an ardent British imperialist.” For years, Robertson ruled the Ontario Hockey Association (OHA), which fought an unrelenting war against professionalism, banning every player even suspected of receiving payment for playing any sport. Robertson’s view had strong support from the leading Toronto newspapers of the day. This was no accident. Robertson himself was the founder and publisher of the Toronto Telegram. His close colleagues in the OHA included Francis Nelson, sports editor of the Toronto Globe, and W.A. Hewitt, sports editor of the Toronto Star.

It should be noted that the intellectual descendants of these men are the contemporary liberal media, political, and financial elites of Ontario who once dismissed Harper as an interloper, a middle-class conservative westerner who would never amount to much in politics or literature. Just as their ancestors tried to shut working-class stiffs out of making money playing hockey, when Harper appeared on the political stage, they continued to radiate disdain for outside competitors for their status and entitlements. It’s an oligarchical state of mind: among the doyens of the International Olympic Committee who continue to champion “amateur” sports while controlling the wealth it generates are numerous descendants of European aristocracy.

In addition to their other failures to appreciate Stephen Harper, few of his critics recognized that Canada’s 22nd prime minister had a well-developed sense of humour. In fact, their relentless campaign to drive him from office relied greatly on the myth that he was a dour, spiteful ogre. Harper’s hockey book is by no means a laugh-a-page, but it’s filled with consistently interesting and often deliciously wry observations for readers open to appreciating them.

Among them is the amusing revelation that the first professional hockey team in Toronto was named, unimaginatively, the Professionals. It was formed in 1906 with high hopes of winning the city’s first Stanley Cup. That didn’t happen for the Professionals, or Toronto, until 1914, when the Toronto Blue Shirts finally captured hockey’s holy grail, 21 years after it was minted. Sadly, the team’s roster almost immediately disintegrated. Many of the same players won the Stanley Cup again in 1917 – while playing for the Seattle Metropolitans. That was the same year the National Hockey League was formed with the express purpose of getting Toronto and its troublesome owner out of professional hockey. This was accomplished by dissolving the National Hockey Association and reconstituting the league under a new name with most of the same teams, except Toronto. The author clearly revels in recounting these anecdotes at Hogtown’s expense. Indeed, the undeclared subtext of A Great Game might be that hockey (and Canada) wins when Toronto loses.

James R. Coggins (www.coggins.ca) is a writer, editor, and historian based in Abbotsford, B.C.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Enduring Legacy of Canada on D-Day

Canada’s military today has submarines that can’t submerge, nearly half-century-old fighter jets that should never be sent into combat, an unending recruitment crisis, a collapsed public image and barely enough combat-capable soldiers to fill an army brigade – in a G7 nation of 40 million people with a nearly $3 trillion economy. Eighty years ago the same country – much poorer and with a population 75 percent smaller – deployed six entire divisions fighting simultaneously in two different combat theatres, more than 500 warplanes and one of the world’s largest navies, and kept them all supplied across an ocean. Historian David J. Bercuson recounts a time when Canada was a country that got stuff done, that earned its seat at the table with the big nations, that knew its purpose, and whose people were able and willing to do whatever it took to win, most especially on the day – June 6, 1944 – when the fate of civilization hung in the balance.

The Sacred Covenant of Kamloops: Replacing Truth and Reconciliation with Secrecy and Self-Abasement

The Roman Catholic Church is steeped in centuries of mystery and ineffable truths. Its time-honoured rituals and beliefs offer an important sense of comfort and continuity to its 1.4 billion worldwide adherents. Yet a mysterious “Sacred Covenant” signed recently between two Canadian Catholic organizations and the Kamloops First Nation concerning unproven allegations of human remains on the grounds of a former Indian Residential School will bring neither comfort nor continuity. Instead, it points to an existential crisis deep within the Church itself. Hymie Rubenstein takes a close look at what is known about this strange agreement, and what it means for the future of truth and reconciliation in Canada.

Canada’s Constitutional Mistake: How the Rule of Law Gave Way to the Managerial State

Most Canadians surely believe their society is governed by the rule of law. We all have rights and freedoms, safeguarded by the courts, that protect us from the tyranny of the state. All of that is mirage, argues Bruce Pardy. In this provocative essay, Pardy describes how authority in Canada is now vested in a managerial elite. They supervise our speech, employment, bank accounts and media. Controlling vast sectors of the economy and society, they track, direct, incentivize, censor, punish, redistribute, subsidize, tax, license and inspect. Elected legislatures delegate them authority, and courts let them do as they like – including infringing on Charter rights – to achieve whatever social goals they deem in the public interest. The rule of law has melted away; rule by law now prevails. It is time, Pardy says, for Canadians to correct the naïve constitutional mistake that started us down this road.

More from this author

Have You Ever Tried Pulling a Camper with an Electric Truck? The Real Costs and Benefits of Ottawa’s EV Revolution

The Trudeau government recently released its regulatory impact statement – including a cost/benefit analysis – explaining the plan to make Canada an all-electric-vehicle nation by 2035. James R. Coggins takes a deep dive into the document and finds it full of wishful thinking and sloppy logic. It also excludes many of the biggest costs consumers and taxpayers will face in the shift to electric cars and trucks. If the Liberals confronted the real costs and benefit of their policy, they’d have to admit that forcing Canadians to go electric will be as impractical as it is pricey. Those amazing and expensive electric pickup trucks? They won’t get you very far with a load in tow.

The Future with Zero-Emission Electric Vehicles

It’s hard not to like electric vehicles. Or rather, it is becoming hard to express open dislike of them. They’re green, clean, quiet, fast, subsidized – and “free” to operate. And if the Liberal government has its way, EVs will soon be the only cars you can buy. It’s all settled! But perhaps it shouldn’t be. James Coggins parts the curtain of EV virtue-signalling and poses some basic questions that should have been answered by now if Canada is to cruise smoothly into its battery-operated future. Car owners and families, brace yourselves for a severe jolt, for Coggins uncovers a yawning vacuum of answers regarding the very fundamentals of building, financing and powering Canada’s soon-to-proliferate EV fleet.

Urban Transit Using Rural Money

Time was that riding public transit was a tad déclassé, reserved for kids, little old ladies and people who hadn’t quite arrived, or never would. Songs like The Guess Who’s “Bus Rider” depicted its dreariness and repetitiveness. Nowadays, hopping the LRT or subway is cool, a virtuous act signalling environmental wokeness and “moving on” from the automobile. The riding experience, naturellement, needs to meet the steep expectations of current gens. And that doesn’t come cheap. James R. Coggins outlines the political game played by federal and municipal politicians that’s seeing tens of billions of dollars being shovelled into city coffers for lavish urban transit schemes, while country dwellers pay part of the freight and receive little but neglect and carbon taxes in return.

Share This Story

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.