Canada’s Sled Dog Apology Plumbs New Depths of Absurdity

Peter Shawn Taylor
September 4, 2019
The voracious need for self-abasement among Western elites appears to have outstripped the supply of victimized groups that can become the focus of grovelling, apology and pay-offs. That is one way to read the federal Liberals’ latest apology, which goes beyond merely stretching reality, distorting facts or ignoring historical context. Peter Shawn Taylor reports on how last month’s $20 million payoff to Canada’s Inuit for an alleged sled-dog slaughter half a century ago that never actually happened simply stands the truth on its head.

Canada’s Sled Dog Apology Plumbs New Depths of Absurdity

Peter Shawn Taylor
September 4, 2019
The voracious need for self-abasement among Western elites appears to have outstripped the supply of victimized groups that can become the focus of grovelling, apology and pay-offs. That is one way to read the federal Liberals’ latest apology, which goes beyond merely stretching reality, distorting facts or ignoring historical context. Peter Shawn Taylor reports on how last month’s $20 million payoff to Canada’s Inuit for an alleged sled-dog slaughter half a century ago that never actually happened simply stands the truth on its head.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

You might remember the ending to the classic western The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

“This is the West,” the crusty newspaperman tells Jimmy Stewart upon learning that Stewart’s character Ranse Stoddard did not – as everyone had long assumed − shoot bad guy Liberty Valance all those years ago. “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”

It’s one of Hollywood’s most famous lines, and a memorable way to end a movie about the taming of the Frontier. But it’s not how we should treat Canadian history. And it’s certainly no way to run a government.

Justin Trudeau apologies four times for various past offences he thinks Canadians committed.

The official version of Canada’s history, at least under the watch of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, is that our country’s past was one endless series of mistakes and outrages that now require absolution through a combination of confession, self-criticism and ample monetary compensation. We’ve seen official apologies delivered for a dizzying array of historical events and policies covering everything from Indian residential schools to the gay community to immigration to individual court cases against Indigenous war chiefs. And all with a hefty bill for Canadian taxpayers.

So frequent have been the apologies emanating from Ottawa that it was regarded as significant that Trudeau chose not to say sorry for his behaviour in the SNC-Lavalin affair. “I’m not going to apologize for standing up for Canadian jobs,” he said in response to the damning Ethics Commissioner’s report. A dog that didn’t bark, so to speak.

Grovelling and paying up: Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett apologizes to the Inuit for something that never happened.

This stout defence of government decision-making turned out not to be the signal of a new policy, however. The very day after the Ethics Commissioner’s August 14 bombshell report, Ottawa was back in the apology business as Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett was apologizing to the Inuit of Baffin Island for the Canadian government’s “killing of qimmiit (sled dogs)” between 1950 and 1975. This latest plea for forgiveness deserves closer attention. First, because it was largely overlooked amid the wall-to-wall SNC Lavalin coverage. And second, because the Trudeau government has reached a new low of grovelling – it’s now apologizing for things that never happened.

Canada’s Inuit have waged a lengthy campaign asserting the existence of a government-led conspiracy to massacre sled dogs in order to colonize the North. “To try to diminish our numbers as Inuit, our dogs were being killed,” native elder George Koneak told a House of Commons committee in 2005. “A decision from Ottawa was that our dogs had to be killed.” A report from the same time by the Makivik Corporation, representing Quebec Inuit, stated boldly that, “during the period 1955 to 1969, government representatives and police forces undertook a massive killing of qimmiit…[an] extermination program.”

Inuit Elder George Koneak insists the federal government conspired to exterminate sled dogs.

Up to 20,000 sled dogs were allegedly wiped out by the federal government to bring the Inuit to heel and, it’s often whispered, to boost sales of snowmobiles by white store owners. There’s even an Inuktitut word for this purported canine pogrom: qimmijaqtauniq, or “the dog slaughter.”

So persuasive were these tales that the government ordered the RCMP to investigate. The Inuit, however, refused to participate since they claimed the police, as the alleged perpetrators of this slaughter nearly two generations earlier, could not be trusted to investigate their predecessors’ behaviour. Despite the Inuit’s lack of cooperation, in 2006 the Mounties reported they could find no evidence of any organized plan to kill sled dogs. While some dogs were certainly shot by police when running loose in northern towns and to help stop the spread of disease, these likely numbered in the hundreds rather than thousands.

No evidence was found of Mounties’ organized a mass murder of sled dogs.

Among many organizational aspects that would have left a documentary trail, the report noted that shooting 20,000 dogs would have required a large requisition of ammunition. There is no archival evidence to support any of this. In fact, reliable academic evidence puts the total population of sled dogs across the North during this time at no more than 10,000. There is, however, convincing evidence of substantial die-offs due to rabies and distemper. In the early 1960s, for example, nearly 80 percent of the sled dogs in Pangnirtung, on Baffin Island, died in a massive canine epidemic.

The Inuit elders’ horrific tales of a government-appointed slaughter of sled dogs are likely the result of the vagaries of oral history. Recollections of a few sled dogs being shot by Mounties as public nuisances have probably been fused over the years with other memories of a great many dogs succumbing to disease. In many ways, the sled dog massacre story is another instance of a collision between Indigenous and Western forms of knowledge. Emotion-laden oral recollections are set in conflict with evidence-based, archival history.

Inuit perceptions of this time are also likely influenced by the massive cultural changes then underway in the North. The Inuit basically went from the Stone Age to the Space Age in one generation − an enormous upheaval with profound social implications. As such, Inuit history must be viewed with a certain sympathy and understanding. But surely facts still matter. And no one should have to apologize for a crime they never committed.

Canine epidemic: Distemper, rabies and other diseases were the main reason to kill dogs in limited numbers.

Dissatisfied with the results of the exculpatory RCMP investigation, the Inuit launched their own inquiry: the Qikiqtani Truth Commission. Its report was released in 2010 and is an intriguing piece of work. It recognizes and supports much of the Mounties’ own report. It explains, for example, that “many qimmiit died as a result of disease outbreaks in spite of a major effort made by the RCMP to inoculate and replace animals.” It also details instances of Inuit hunters killing or abandoning their own dogs, either due to disease or “because they no longer had enough time to hunt or care for the dogs.”

But instead of highlighting evidence showing federal officials were engaged in saving rather than slaughtering the dogs – and even apparently in providing new ones – the inquiry chose to play up the Inuit’s fragile emotional state during this time and to rail against the public health ordinances that required some dogs to be put down because they were running loose or to control disease. And to soothe the hurt feelings created by these policies, it determined, the Inuit were still owed an apology from Ottawa. If the RCMP were guilty of investigating themselves, the Qikiqtani report appears to have decided on its conclusion that an apology was due long before it looked at any evidence.

Academics ever-eager to play up the victimization of Indigenous groups within a colonial narrative have since seized on the Qikiqtani Truth Commission’s conclusions as proof of a government-led campaign of dog annihilation. “A flash point in Inuit memories: Endangered knowledges in the Mountie Sled Dog Massacre,” reads the almost illiterate title of one 2013 journal article authored by a professor at the University of New England that draws heavily on the Qikiqtani report. Despite a total lack of evidence to support claims of any deliberate government policy to kill sled dogs, this period is now universally referred to as a “massacre”.

The ultimate upgrade: The speed and ease of the snowmobile doomed the traditional dog sled.

Regardless of the cultural significance of travel by dog sled, even those Inuit involved in the qimmijaqtauniq campaign have freely admitted that snowmobiles represented a significant upgrade in functionality and reliability. “I really wanted to get a snowmobile because I didn’t have to run beside it,” says one unnamed Inuit elder in the 2004 video “Echo of the Last Howl”, produced by the Makivik Corp. “The speed and ease of the snowmobile was the downfall of the dog sled.” Whether the dogs died or not, the sled team was doomed as the dominant form of transportation in the North.

It’s little wonder the Inuit so eagerly adopted the snowmobile, just as they had earlier adopted rifles to replace harpoons and spears, and as they continue to use other western technology they find useful. Today there are approximately 25,000 snowmobiles registered in Canada’s three Arctic territories – far more than the likely historical number of sled dogs – and for good reason. A dog team averages barely 20 km per hour over sustained distances, and just half that in difficult conditions. Sled dogs eat voraciously and keeping them fed, in turn, demands prodigious hunting.

Handy Western technology: The Inuit had also gladly adopted the rifle, replacing hunting by hand.

Despite overwhelming evidence that there was no government campaign to slaughter sled dogs, as well as the obvious logic behind why the Inuit themselves shifted from sled teams to snowmobiles, the federal Liberals chose sentiment over substance. And so Bennett delivered her official federal apology for something Canada’s government never did. She also handed over $20 million in “sorry” money. This is not merely an outrage of principle but an enormous mistake that is likely to have far-reaching consequences. Apologizing for a myth that has been disproven makes a mockery of proper regret and of persons or groups who were actually wronged. And it reinforces the self-loathing (and wholly erroneous) narrative that the entirety of Canadian colonial history was an evil plot aimed at native genocide.

Saving over slaughtering: the Inuit’s own inquiry found the RCMP tried hard to inoculate sled dogs and even replace casualties.

“Canada apologizes to Qikiqtani Inuit for sled dog killings,” read the headline in the Nunatsiaq News following Bennett’s announcement. Regardless of the truth, future generations will thereby assume the worst actually happened because our apology-obsessed federal government has said sorry – and paid up.

What was once legend has become fact.

Peter Shawn Taylor is an Associate Editor of the C2C Journal and a freelance writer based in Waterloo, Ontario.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Private Sector Must Get a Larger Role in Canadian Health Care

Canada has so far ducked the extreme growth in the Covid-19 hospitalization and mortality rates afflicting some other countries. The worst is certainly still to come, however – and when it does, the shortfall in Canada’s health care capacity will be laid bare. The vulnerability was largely avoidable, points out Gwyn Morgan, if Canada like nearly all other countries had only allowed private health care delivery alongside its public system. When the nation comes out the other side of the pandemic, Morgan writes, a health care policy reckoning will be long overdue.

Future of Conservatism Series, Part V: Could Canada Handle a Trumpian Populist?

Democratic politics must continue even in times of war. Despite suspension of the federal Conservative leadership race amidst the coronavirus, members and supporters still need to think about how to shape their party and pick the right leader to best meet the many challenges of our era. C2C Journal has looked at revived Red Toryism, at uncompromisingly principled conservatism and at the decidedly compromised but successful Harper way. We have sought insight from abroad. And now we turn to populism. Barry Cooper applies his usual fearless thinking and cheerful bluntness to evaluate whether the Canadian political landscape has become hospitable terrain to a Canadian Trump.

Want More Affordable Housing in Canada? Build More Houses

Solving Canada’s housing crisis shouldn’t require more than a single lesson in economics. When prices are high, a free market always responds and supplies more. Yet amidst Canada’s severe problems of housing affordability, this foolproof mechanism is continually frustrated by governments that are either ignorant of how markets work, fixated on preserving the status quo or display naked contempt for the profit motive. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the scorn heaped on land developers, landlords and the rest of the housing supply industry and wonders how they became the villains of this story.

Thinking Clearly in a Time of Panic

How should the conservative mind respond to the coronavirus pandemic? Panic and despair are in ample supply, and the urge to succumb appears widespread. Others have steered, via deliberate ignorance, to fatalism, though the walls are closing in on such rebels. Both extremes are beneath thoughtful conservatives. C2C Editor-in-Chief George Koch counsels that however dark today might appear, the eternal search for objective truth – the foundation for all conservative thought – is the first necessary step along the path to seeing humankind through to brighter days.

Future of Conservatism Series Part IV: Rallying the World’s Centre-Right Parties

As Canada’s Conservatives evaluate leadership hopefuls and ponder what their party is about and which path might lead to electoral victory, it’s easy to ignore international politics. They should take a look, for the world holds dozens of established centre-right democratic parties, and many are tackling challenges of relevance and adaptation at least as steep as those burdening Canada’s Conservatives. John Weissenberger travelled to Washington, D.C. for the annual conference of the International Democrat Union (IDU) and provides his assessment in this essay. Later this year, once international travel is restored, Weissenberger heads to Vienna to deepen his understanding at the IDU’s 2020 Forum.

Averting “Climate Poverty” for Canada’s Middle Class

Pursuing grandiose visions tends to cloud judgment, and when the vision is saving our very planet from an apprehended climate crisis, it’s little surprise that numbers are fudged, logic is twisted, the hardest-hit are ignored and entire social classes are cast into the trash. Matthew Lau, however, refuses to be dazzled by dreams. In this article, Lau remains rooted in reality and fixed on crunching the numbers to come up with some arresting conclusions about the huge costs of government climate policies to working people here and now, set against marginal if not ephemeral benefits to come over the next 80 years.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

By clicking SUBSCRIBE, you agree to receive emails from C2C Journal. You can unsubscribe at any time.