Ideology and Realpolitik

How to Create Impoverishment and Energy Insecurity

Gwyn Morgan
March 14, 2022
As fighting rages in Ukraine, energy prices soar and inflation spirals, countries and their leaders are showing what they’re made of. Some appear jolted by reality and are recalibrating foreign relations, fiscal regimes and energy policies. Others are doubling down on blind ideology. Despite acute vulnerability to Russian energy blackmail, for example, Germany still intends to shutter the last of its nuclear power plants. And Justin Trudeau, representing a country sitting on the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, was last week pledging to help the world transition to “renewables.” Where will such unshakeable utopianism lead? To a truly terrible combination, writes Gwyn Morgan: inflation- and tax-induced impoverishment for millions of Canadians, increasingly intermittent and unaffordable energy supplies for peace-loving countries, and no effective check on geopolitical bullies who use energy as a weapon.
Ideology and Realpolitik

How to Create Impoverishment and Energy Insecurity

Gwyn Morgan
March 14, 2022
As fighting rages in Ukraine, energy prices soar and inflation spirals, countries and their leaders are showing what they’re made of. Some appear jolted by reality and are recalibrating foreign relations, fiscal regimes and energy policies. Others are doubling down on blind ideology. Despite acute vulnerability to Russian energy blackmail, for example, Germany still intends to shutter the last of its nuclear power plants. And Justin Trudeau, representing a country sitting on the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, was last week pledging to help the world transition to “renewables.” Where will such unshakeable utopianism lead? To a truly terrible combination, writes Gwyn Morgan: inflation- and tax-induced impoverishment for millions of Canadians, increasingly intermittent and unaffordable energy supplies for peace-loving countries, and no effective check on geopolitical bullies who use energy as a weapon.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Crude oil prices soared beyond a staggering US$120 per barrel in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. But that’s not a new record. Inflation-adjusted oil prices reached the same level in 2013 (and were repeatedly above US$100 per barrel from 2011 through mid-2014), driving a supply-increase response that temporarily lowered prices. World oil demand then steadily increased and reached 100 million barrels per day before the Covid-19 collapse. Demand has since come roaring back and despite all the “Net Zero” rhetoric, the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts that world oil demand will continue to grow. The big question is: who will supply all that oil? Middle Eastern countries, led by Saudi Arabia, will be major contributors and, despite the U.S. and U.K.’s bravado in banning Russian imports, current and forecast world oil demand cannot be met without Russian oil.

xThe world will continue to use crude oil, but who will supply it? With the world’s third-largest crude oil reserves, Canada could have become an “energy superpower.” Instead, the Liberal government cancels new oil and natural gas pipelines (top) and fosters eastern Canada’s continuing dependence on Middle Eastern and African oil, imported via tankers up the St. Lawrence River in Quebec (bottom). (Sources of photos: (top) www.capp.ca, (bottom) www.canadaaction.ca)

The disparate list of countries controlling world oil supply may soon include Iran if, as news reports suggest, U.S. President Joe Biden is naïve enough to remove oil export sanctions in return for the Ayatollah’s “pledge” to suspend uranium enrichment for nuclear weapons development. That would leave world oil supply security in the hands of countries that subjugate women, a country led by a murderous psychopath and a country developing a nuclear bomb with the avowed objective of annihilating Israel (a threat that Iran’s leaders and generals have issued innumerable times; here is just one example).

Meanwhile Canada, with the world’s third-largest oil reserves and the potential to produce far more than its current approximately 4 million barrels per day, is sacrificing hundreds of billions of dollars per year in revenues and new capital investment, along with tens of thousands of well-paying jobs, on the Net Zero altar with policies that discourage new production and all-but rule out building new oil export pipelines. Even a proposed cross-country pipeline that would have delivered Canadian oil to eastern refineries was deliberately stymied by the Trudeau government, leaving tankers carrying Saudi Arabian and African oil up the fragile Gulf of St. Lawrence, while emitting immensely more greenhouse gases than domestic oil.

It doesn’t have to be this way. Speaking in London in July 2006, before departing for a Vladimir Putin-hosted G8 Summit in St. Petersburg, then Prime Minister Stephen Harper called Canada “an emerging energy superpower.” Oil and natural gas industry capital investment rose sharply in the following years, doubling from $30 billion to $60 billion per year before the Harper government’s defeat in 2015. By 2019, Trudeau’s anti-oil and natural gas policies had contributed greatly to collapsing capital spending to less than half of 2006 levels – a decline of 75 percent from their Harper-era peak. While a dip in commodity prices early in the Trudeau years played a role, oil and natural gas industries around the world were soon booming once more. But not Canada’s. The situation we find ourselves in today is largely the result of deliberate policy choices.

xDeliberate destruction: After rising to record levels under Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada’s annual capital spending on oil and natural gas development declined dramatically under Justin Trudeau. (Source: Statistics Canada)

Most Canadians are unmindful of these issues. But if there’s one thing that gets their attention, it’s the price of gasoline (and diesel) at the pump. The current escalation of fuel prices must be sending anti-fossil-fuel ideologues worshipping at the Net Zero altar into celestial orgasm. But not real-world working Canadians. On March 4, gasoline in B.C. hit $2.00 per litre, taking the cost of filling up the family minivan or crossover utility vehicle to at least $150. Given the sprawling nature of Canadian cities, commuting to work, running a few errands and getting the kids to and from school generally takes at least one fill-up per week. That amounts to more than $600 per month for one family vehicle. And people who commute downtown from bedroom communities or tradespeople operating a full-sized truck have it far worse. Let’s look at the three highest-gas-price cities as of March 4:

Toronto –                    

Pump price: $1.75/litre

Taxes: $0.57/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

HST                                    $0.21

Provincial fuel tax       $0.15

Montreal – 

Pump price: $1.84/litre
Taxes: $0.59/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

QST+GST                         $0.23

Provincial fuel tax       $0.15

Vancouver –

Pump price: $2.01/litre

Taxes: $0.67/litre, of which:

Federal carbon tax      $0.11

Federal excise tax        $0.10

GST                                    $0.10

Provincial fuel tax       $0.02

B.C. transport tax        $0.07

City transit tax              $0.18

B.C. carbon tax             $0.09

In all three examples, federal and provincial taxes make up about one-third of the price of fuel. As these prices continue to escalate, food and other necessities have also risen to record levels across the country. A recent Angus Reid survey found that 53 percent of Canadians already consider themselves unable to keep up with the rising cost of living.

xThe equivalent of a pay cut, only worse: As gasoline cracked $2 per litre in B.C. in early March, the costs of groceries and other basic goods continued their inexorable rise, creating worsening economic pressure on Canadian families. (Source of top photo: Vancouver CityNews)

The 11 cents per litre in federal carbon tax don’t seem like much compared with current total pump prices. But that’s just the beginning. The Trudeau government plans to progressively increase the carbon tax to 38 cents per litre by 2030. Adding the 9-cent-per-litre B.C. carbon tax (just one of seven taxes levied on motor fuels in that province) means that drivers in that province will pay carbon taxes of 47 cents per litre. The theory behind carbon taxes is that higher prices will reduce consumption of the thing being taxed and its associated activities – in this case, driving, which emits carbon dioxide, the ostensible target of Net Zero ideology.

But this theory only applies in practice if there’s a viable alternative. For millions of already cost-stressed real-world Canadians to whom their vehicle is a must-have for their small business, getting to work or maintaining their family lives in a busy world, imposing carbon taxes on fuel simply impoverishes them. They still need to drive. As they spend more on fuel, they are forced to spend less on everything else. That is equivalent to taking a cut in pay, only in some ways worse, because this pay cut keeps increasing month by month. (As an important side note, I should mention that natural gas prices have also been climbing. This increases the costs of home heating and of electricity in many provinces. It is also generally inflationary as operating businesses, commercial buildings and public facilities becomes more expensive. So this is another source of impoverishment, one that hits people who don’t even own a vehicle.) 

At this time, when Russian President Putin threatens to cut oil exports, the importance of unleashing Canada’s enormous crude oil (as well as natural gas) resources has never been clearer. While visiting Latvia on March 8, a reporter asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau if Canada could help make up the oil supply shortage. His answer illustrated the fanatical depth of his worship at the Net Zero altar: “We will be there to support, as the world moves beyond Russian oil and indeed, beyond fossil fuels, to have more renewables in our mix.”

xConveniently erasing the “energy superpower”: Justin Trudeau’s (left) fixation on pushing “renewables” at the expense of Canada’s oil and natural gas sector is great for Vladimir Putin’s (right) war chest and his blackmailing of energy-starved Europe. (Sources of photos: (left) The Associated Press /Roman Koksarov), (right) The Associated Press /Mikhail Klimentyev, Sputnik)

This incredible answer – an ungrammatical melange of ideology, non-sequitur and attempted misdirection from the moment’s acute urgency – comes at a time when innocent Ukrainians and their beautiful country are being ravaged by a megalomaniac who threatens the world with nuclear Armageddon. President Putin should be grateful to Trudeau for helping him control world oil markets by hamstringing Canada’s “energy superpower” potential. Let’s be crystal-clear: the Liberal government’s policies are driving us towards a horrific combination of impoverishment and energy insecurity. All of it entirely avoidable. Never before have I been ashamed of being a Canadian. I pray for new political leadership that will make me, and millions of other dispirited Canadians, proud of our country again.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Source of main image: Shutterstock.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

What the Oscar-nominated Canadian Documentary Sugarcane Gets Wrong, and Why

The secret to every good magic trick, Michael Caine’s character explains in the 2006 movie The Prestige, is a willing audience. “You want to be fooled,” he says. Anyone watching the Oscar-nominated documentary film Sugarcane could find themselves slipping into a similar act of self-deception. Focused on a residential school in northern B.C., the Canadian-made Sugarcane withholds key facts, arranges other evidence in confusing ways and encourages viewers – already primed to think the worst of residential schools – to reach unfounded conclusions about what they’re actually seeing. Even professional movie critics have been fooled. Documentary filmmaker Michelle Stirling pulls back the curtain on the dark magic behind Sugarcane.

The Dangerous Absurdity of Canada’s “Nation-to-Nation” Treaty with Manitoba Métis Federation Inc.

When the Métis were included in Canada’s 1982 Constitution as “aboriginal peoples”, some members complained that they’d been handed an “empty box” compared to the ample rights and treaties offered to Indian and Inuit people. Since then, however, Canada’s court system has been hard at work filling up that box. Now, with the signing of a “nation-to-nation” treaty late last year, Manitoba Métis have a box that’s positively overflowing with new rights, powers and federal cash. Peter Best explores how Canada came to recognize a fractious, landless, fully-assimilated, colonial-era group – a group that is actually represented by a corporation – as a nation with an inherent right to self-government, as well as the deeply problematic consequences of this decision.

More from this author

A Mind that Matters: Why Everyone Should Know Thomas Sowell

“It’s hard to imagine a more stupid or dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Such was Thomas Sowell’s withering critique of bureaucracy – more relevant today than ever. The legendary economist was born to poor sharecroppers and began his career as an avowed Marxist before transforming himself into an insightful and influential critic of the left and all its smug self-regard. In this concise tribute, Gwyn Morgan shares some of Sowell’s sharpest thinking and explains what Canadians can learn from one of America’s greatest minds.

Strike Force: How Powerful Unions like Canada’s Postal Workers Divide Canadians and Damage the Economy

Canada’s beleaguered economy has become beset with strikes called by unions demanding double-digit wage hikes in an era of constrained budgets and slim profit margins. The latest one, by Canada Post, is already inflicting great damage and threatens to drag on, perhaps right up to Christmas. Yet recent legislation passed by the Liberal government (pushed by the NDP) has made it more likely that major strikes will occur, and even more difficult for employers to try to continue functioning. This, writes Gwyn Morgan, is increasingly dividing Canada into a nation of “haves” – overpaid unionized workers – and “have nots” – everyone else. It is time, says Morgan, that someone stood up for the millions of Canadians victimized by power-wielding union bosses and the governments that enable them.

A Frisson of Fission: Why Nuclear Power Won’t Replace Natural Gas as North America’s Critical Fuel

The recent collapse of the power grid in Cuba, plunging the island nation into darkness and grinding its meagre economy to a halt, served as a reminder of electricity’s centrality to modern civilization. That dependency is only expected to increase as more electric vehicles take to the road – and, writes Gwyn Morgan, as the tech sector’s voracious appetite for electrons expands unabated. Morgan pours a pail of cold water on the much-mooted “nuclear revival” that has yet to deliver any actual new electricity. He argues instead that what’s needed is clear-eyed recognition that the most reliable, most abundant, most flexible and most affordable energy source is a fossil fuel located in vast quantities right beneath North Americans’ feet.

Reading Progress

Share This Story by Gwyn Morgan

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.