How Do You Solve a Problem like Omar?

Bob Tarantino
March 20, 2012
Little common ground exists between those who view Omar Khadr as a tortured man-child whose purported abandonment ranks as among the most grievous injustices of the last decade, and those who would have preferred that the enthusiastic young al Qaeda soldier had been left to die on the battlefield. C2C Journal’s Bob Tarantino reviews Ezra Levant’s new book, The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr.

How Do You Solve a Problem like Omar?

Bob Tarantino
March 20, 2012
Little common ground exists between those who view Omar Khadr as a tortured man-child whose purported abandonment ranks as among the most grievous injustices of the last decade, and those who would have preferred that the enthusiastic young al Qaeda soldier had been left to die on the battlefield. C2C Journal’s Bob Tarantino reviews Ezra Levant’s new book, The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr

Ezra Levant

McClelland & Stewart (2011) 250 pages

Reviewed by Bob Tarantino

Ezra Levant’s third book in three years continues his streak as Canada’s premier conservative polemicist.  Though sometimes regarded pejoratively, the aggressive disputation of a controversial topic is a valuable part of political discourse.  Polemics distil warring positions to their sometimes ugly essence.  They serve to rally adherents to the cause while simultaneously enraging opponents.  Within those parameters, The Enemy Within: Terror, Lies and the Whitewashing of Omar Khadr represents a zenith, of sorts, for Levant’s written endeavours.  The book is perhaps best understood as Levant’s attempt to deliver a prosecutor’s brief.  The fact that it is being delivered to the public not only after Khadr’s defenders have made their case, but after a verdict has been rendered is simply in keeping with the often outlandish story of Omar Khadr.

When assessing Levant’s books, two aspects of their context are important to understand.  First, Levant is, for good or ill, virtually sui generis on Canadian bookshelves.  Canadian political publishing has tended to consist of serial books by progressive writers such as Linda McQuaig and David Suzuki – conservatives  could claim no voice comparable in terms of volume of output, audience size or media presence.  The paucity of conservative political writing was particularly striking in comparison to the United States, where the likes of Ann Coulter, Mark Levin and David Frum traded volleys with Michael Moore, Al Franken and Glenn Greenwald.  The second contextual element is that conservative politics of Ezra’s vintage was marinated in a finely-honed sense of grievance, against a liberal media and a Liberal government which dominated Canadian politics from 1993 through 2006.  Conditioned by years of sneering dismissal, turnabout is difficult to begrudge.  In the wrong hands, at the wrong times, robust conservatism can come across as shrill, even bug-eyed.  The Enemy Within avoids that fate by being almost clinical in its presentation.  A reader of Levant’s previous works or a viewer of his Sun News Network show, both of which generally display at least hints of a sly sense of humour, may be surprised to read the sober, even grim, tone of this book.

At its best, Ezra’s public persona and output is akin to performance art: the unrelenting and unflinching assertion of conservative (or at least anti-progressive) positions, delivered with an almost gleeful lack of concern for the sensitivities of his opponents.  His delivery, as much as his arguments, threatens to drive those on the other side of the political divide into frothing fury.  The story of Omar, prodigal son of Canada’s al Qaeda-cheering Khadr family, the killing of U.S. army medic Christopher Speer and Omar’s subsequent imprisonment and treatment at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, his confession and pending release to Canada’s care, may be the most divisive topic in Canadian politics.  Even if it is not, little common ground exists between those who view Omar as a tortured man-child whose purported abandonment by the Canadian government ranks as among the most grievous injustices of the last decade and those who would have preferred that the enthusiastic young al Qaeda soldier had been left to die on the battlefield and who richly deserved whatever befell him subsequently.  These two sets of people stare at each other in horrified bafflement, across a chasm of incomprehension arising from incompatible value sets.

Levant writes a book designed to speak to and for the first group and to drive the second group into fits.  He lays out a series of arguments from which he concludes that nothing untoward has been done to Omar Khadr.  Quoting extensively from Omar’s confession, Levant describes Khadr as a cold-blooded, highly-trained murderer, a “gangster” who relishes his recollections of the killing of Sgt. Speer.  Levant dismisses the applicability of the Geneva Conventions to Khadr’s detention.  He chides the Canadian news media for focusing on Khadr and ignoring Sgt. Speer and his widow – an inversion of the usual coverage approach used when discussing alleged killer and victim.  Swatting away arguments that Khadr is a child soldier, Levant asserts that a fifteen year-old murderer in Canada would be tried and imprisoned, not released and celebrated.  Sneering at the conventional media view that Guantanamo Bay is a “gulag”, Levant chronicles the first-class medical treatments, the halal-certified lasagne and hamburger meals, the movie nights, the ping-pong tables, the libraries, the video games – even the magazines, comic books, cologne and Skechers sneakers requested by Omar and provided by Canadian government officials.  He rejects out of hand any assertion that Khadr was “tortured”, regardless of what definition one uses for that term.  Along the way Levant chronicles the nearly demented musings of some Canadian pundits who describe Khadr as a hero, even a Nelson Mandela-like figure.

In response, someone could point out that the Geneva Convention is not the only international treaty governing Khadr’s treatment, or that relying on the confession of an individual held in a detention facility for years without trial may be subject to at least some qualifications.  One might cavil that a more judicious account would express at least some scepticism about the assessments of psychiatrists or the predictions of intelligence agencies.  You could argue that Levant’s presentation of Khadr’s case lacks much nuance.  But Levant’s ignoring of those points, his obdurate insistence on not even paying lip service to conventional wisdom about Khadr is so brazen as to indicate an agenda quite different from that of the journalist.  Criticizing Levant for a lack of subtlety is akin to faulting a defence lawyer for not admitting his client is actually kind of guilty – it misses the point of what he is trying to accomplish.

It is therefore to be expected that The Enemy Within suffers from characteristics typical of its genre.  Levant adopts a declarative voice, offering little or no engagement with the actual arguments advanced by others; while notable only because Canadians are unused to such an approach originating from Levant’s political perspective, the one-sided treatment remains regrettable.  Nor should The Enemy Within be mistaken for a forensic analysis of its topic.  A relatively short book, aside from quotations obtained from Khadr’s confession and the “Opinion on Dangerousness” delivered at Khadr’s trial by Dr. Michael Welner, it relies almost entirely on second-hand sources with relatively little original research.

That reveals that one of the tenets underlying Levant’s outrage is based on a bit of a conceit: though most pundits rely on the assertion, “the media” is not monolithic; indeed, almost all of Levant’s Khadr-damning facts come from the same news coverage that Levant blasts as being blind to Khadr’s true nature.  Therein lies the biggest missed opportunity in the book: The Enemy Within never recounts Levant asking other people why they feel the way they do about Khadr.  The book would have been measurably improved by an interview with even one of the journalists, like the Toronto Star’s Michelle Shephard, whose pro-Khadr stance Levant so vigorously assaults.

Even with those faults, however, the book can be occasionally bracing.  Levant completely defenestrates the comically hypocritical and self-serving positions of the Liberal Party and the Canadian Bar Association, the lawyers’ trade association which only discovered its passion for Omar Khadr once Stephen Harper’s government had taken power in 2006.  His criticism extends across party lines: he excoriates the Harper government’s surprising decision to make arrangements for Khadr’s early release and return to Canada, circumventing the verdict of the military commission jury that Khadr be imprisoned for forty years.  One of the most inventive moments in the book is Levant’s crafting of a way in which the Minister of Public Safety can still prevent Khadr returning to Canada.  (The current minister, Vic Toews, may just be ornery enough to take Levant’s advice.)

The Enemy Within is unlikely to change many minds about Omar Khadr or his treatment – which is fine, since the topic is not one about which people are inclined to re-think their positions.  Not every book needs to be designed to persuade the undecided.  Sometimes it is enough – more than enough – to provide a robust testament to your own positions and to the mendacity of your opponents.

~

Bob Tarantino is a Toronto lawyer and contributes regularly to C2C Journal.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Want More Affordable Housing in Canada? Build More Houses

Solving Canada’s housing crisis shouldn’t require more than a single lesson in economics. When prices are high, a free market always responds and supplies more. Yet amidst Canada’s severe problems of housing affordability, this foolproof mechanism is continually frustrated by governments that are either ignorant of how markets work, fixated on preserving the status quo or display naked contempt for the profit motive. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the scorn heaped on land developers, landlords and the rest of the housing supply industry and wonders how they became the villains of this story.

Thinking Clearly in a Time of Panic

How should the conservative mind respond to the coronavirus pandemic? Panic and despair are in ample supply, and the urge to succumb appears widespread. Others have steered, via deliberate ignorance, to fatalism, though the walls are closing in on such rebels. Both extremes are beneath thoughtful conservatives. C2C Editor-in-Chief George Koch counsels that however dark today might appear, the eternal search for objective truth – the foundation for all conservative thought – is the first necessary step along the path to seeing humankind through to brighter days.

Future of Conservatism Series Part IV: Rallying the World’s Centre-Right Parties

As Canada’s Conservatives evaluate leadership hopefuls and ponder what their party is about and which path might lead to electoral victory, it’s easy to ignore international politics. They should take a look, for the world holds dozens of established centre-right democratic parties, and many are tackling challenges of relevance and adaptation at least as steep as those burdening Canada’s Conservatives. John Weissenberger travelled to Washington, D.C. for the annual conference of the International Democrat Union (IDU) and provides his assessment in this essay. Later this year, once international travel is restored, Weissenberger heads to Vienna to deepen his understanding at the IDU’s 2020 Forum.

Averting “Climate Poverty” for Canada’s Middle Class

Pursuing grandiose visions tends to cloud judgment, and when the vision is saving our very planet from an apprehended climate crisis, it’s little surprise that numbers are fudged, logic is twisted, the hardest-hit are ignored and entire social classes are cast into the trash. Matthew Lau, however, refuses to be dazzled by dreams. In this article, Lau remains rooted in reality and fixed on crunching the numbers to come up with some arresting conclusions about the huge costs of government climate policies to working people here and now, set against marginal if not ephemeral benefits to come over the next 80 years.

Hit the Bench: Beverley McLachlin’s Reputation Takes a Dive in Retirement

When Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Beverley McLachlin stepped down in 2017, she was regarded as one of the most consequential jurists in Canadian history, largely due to her court’s activist approach to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Her career arc was also widely considered a triumph of progressive feminism in the face of an entrenched legal patriarchy. That reputation is due for a re-assessment. Grant A. Brown sifts through the evidence of McLachlin’s autobiography and various post-retirement missteps, and unearths what he feels is a surprising lack of principle, objectivity and sound reasoning.

Stronger Alliances with First Nations Could Help Overcome Blockade Disruptions

The sight of Justin Trudeau’s ministers genuflecting before petty aristocrats, anarchists, tire-burners and masked thugs sickened millions of Canadians – and made some of us think about hoarding critical supplies. Aside from the venality and sheer ineffectiveness of the Liberals’ approach, Gwyn Morgan was struck by our enlightened rulers’ bone-headed misunderstanding of diplomacy. Going cap-in-hand to the people who despise you is unlikely to end well. And when there are other options, it’s unforgivable. Morgan suggests instead applying age-old principles of diplomacy – like supporting one’s allies to maximize their influence. He should know, for he has done it himself.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required