Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

The History of Montréal by: Paul-Andre Linteau

201pp.: Baraka Books, 2013

Reviewed by: Olivier Ballou

Next time you walk down rue Saint-Jacques in Montréal – the quaint touristy strip near the city’s famed Old Port – keep in mind that for a hundred years it was home to the largest concentration of wealth and power in Canada. Today, Montréal is better known for its cheap rent, street protests and strip clubs – poor but sexy. The History of Montréal tells the story of how the former “beating heart of a commercial and political empire” reached its current sorry state.

Linteau’s book is a straightforward and unexciting account of Montréal’s history – even its title is dull. The first half charts the growth of the former colonial outpost, replete with Iroquois raiders, a booming fur trade and the British conquête. Montréal’s rise is a testament to the dynamist worldview: unpredictable, organic and based on constant adaptation.

As world trade expanded, Montréal became a magnet for investment. Factories sprouted near the harbour and railway lines, around which were clustered working-class dwellings, which led to the advent of Montréal’s trademark walk-up buildings. Later, electric tramways that allowed workers to live farther from work were in turn scrapped in favour of automobiles.

While Montréal’s English-speaking elite did well, the rising tide also lifted francophone ships:

… [H]undreds of thousands of new residents flocked to Montreal from all over the province …. Professionals, small business owners, insurance agents, and the like all benefited from a richer French-Canadian clientele that was swelling in numbers before their very eyes.

Millions voted with their feet by choosing to live there: Scottish fur barons, French Canadian factory workers, Eastern European Jews. “There was work for everyone, born in Montréal or otherwise ….” However, Anglos fled and immigrants eschewed the city in the latter part of the 20th century: “In the 1970s, Montréal entered a long period of weak growth and economic restructuring. Dark, gloomy clouds settled over the city.” The author compares Expo 67 to a fireworks display that masked the beginning of an inexorable decline. In fact, that same year, experts predicted Montréal’s population would reach five million by 1981, yet it has never surpassed three million.

So what went wrong? In the book’s second half, Linteau’s work falls short. He takes pains to minimize the role of Québec nationalism and other self-inflicted damage in Montréal’s decline. Indeed, it is true that Toronto overtook Montréal as Canada’s economic capital by 1960, long before the Parti Québécois’ victory. However, Linteau describes Montréal’s 1995 real estate nadir without mentioning the referendum of the same year. Linteau notes Montréal’s uncompetitive factories and lack of private investment but never asks whether Québec’s embrace of big government, dirigisme, and high taxes played a role. That is a significant omission in any account of the fall of Montréal as a capitalist city, akin to omitting the rise of competition in automotive manufacturing in any account of Detroit.

On a personal note, I grew up in Québec’s northern hinterlands, and I remember the frisson of walking down rue Sainte-Catherine Est with its concentration of tattoo parlours, peep shows and grimy fast-food joints. I lived in the city for a year but was drawn away from la belle province, first to Ottawa and now Calgary. Indeed, just like the Montréal of old, my Calgary apartment building is filled with newcomers – including many Indian IT workers (Calgary has almost three times as many corporate headquarters per capita as Montréal does). However, Linteau’s account reminds us how quickly things can change. Let The History of Montréal serve as a cautionary tale.

~

Olivier Ballou is Director of Communications at the Manning Centre for Building Democracy and the author of the Graphic Guide to Conservatism.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Beyond the Tantrum: Canadian Self-Determination Demands More Than Anti-Americanism

With another Canada Day having passed, it’s a good time to reflect on the patriotic fervour sweeping the country. In P.M. Szpunar’s estimation, much of it is nothing to be proud of. From performative “Buy Canadian” campaigns to booing U.S. children on visiting sports teams, too many Canadians have responded to American swagger with self-righteous sneering, assuring themselves their country is wiser, kinder and more civilized. This even as the southward flow of Canadian money, talent and innovation accelerates. Self-indulgent anti-Americanism is not just lazy and immature, argues Szpunar, it’s counter-productive, distracting Canadians from the real work of addressing our own weaknesses and rebuilding our strengths. A serious country should want better.

“We hold these truths”: The U.S. Declaration of Independence at 250

As America celebrates its 250th anniversary, it is worth taking a fresh look at the U.S. Declaration of Independence to rediscover how the principles embedded in this foundational document have provided the basis of a free society for a quarter-millennium. More than just a demand for freedom, and no mere list of grievances, David W. Livingstone regards the Declaration as a work of genius that speaks to all of humanity. In the worldview it propounds, human equality comes first, individual rights are intrinsic to that principle, and governments don’t “grant” rights but instead are formed to protect rights that every person already holds. The “truths” that America’s Founders proclaimed to be “self-evident”, Livingstone writes, have endured because they are true – and will continue to shine as a beacon for all.

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

More from this author

Why conservatives should stop worrying and start loving art

Yes a lot of contemporary art is left-wing agitprop. Yes it’s outrageous that taxpayers have to pay for it. And yes some artists take particular pleasure in producing art that makes conservative heads explode. So what? Get over it, writes Olivier Ballou. Art and artists are more politically diverse than conservatives think, and they are the tribunes of a free, democratic and prosperous society. Even the abstract artists!