Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Stories

The Rise and Fall of Capitalist Montréal

Olivier Ballou
June 19, 2013
Amongst endless stories of corruption and decline, it is easy to forget how economically powerful Montréal once was. One time Montréal resident Olivier Ballou reviews a new account of growth and decline that, like the city itself, fails to grasp the importance of open markets for continued growth and prosperity
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

The History of Montréal by: Paul-Andre Linteau

201pp.: Baraka Books, 2013

Reviewed by: Olivier Ballou

Next time you walk down rue Saint-Jacques in Montréal – the quaint touristy strip near the city’s famed Old Port – keep in mind that for a hundred years it was home to the largest concentration of wealth and power in Canada. Today, Montréal is better known for its cheap rent, street protests and strip clubs – poor but sexy. The History of Montréal tells the story of how the former “beating heart of a commercial and political empire” reached its current sorry state.

Linteau’s book is a straightforward and unexciting account of Montréal’s history – even its title is dull. The first half charts the growth of the former colonial outpost, replete with Iroquois raiders, a booming fur trade and the British conquête. Montréal’s rise is a testament to the dynamist worldview: unpredictable, organic and based on constant adaptation.

As world trade expanded, Montréal became a magnet for investment. Factories sprouted near the harbour and railway lines, around which were clustered working-class dwellings, which led to the advent of Montréal’s trademark walk-up buildings. Later, electric tramways that allowed workers to live farther from work were in turn scrapped in favour of automobiles.

While Montréal’s English-speaking elite did well, the rising tide also lifted francophone ships:

… [H]undreds of thousands of new residents flocked to Montreal from all over the province …. Professionals, small business owners, insurance agents, and the like all benefited from a richer French-Canadian clientele that was swelling in numbers before their very eyes.

Millions voted with their feet by choosing to live there: Scottish fur barons, French Canadian factory workers, Eastern European Jews. “There was work for everyone, born in Montréal or otherwise ….” However, Anglos fled and immigrants eschewed the city in the latter part of the 20th century: “In the 1970s, Montréal entered a long period of weak growth and economic restructuring. Dark, gloomy clouds settled over the city.” The author compares Expo 67 to a fireworks display that masked the beginning of an inexorable decline. In fact, that same year, experts predicted Montréal’s population would reach five million by 1981, yet it has never surpassed three million.

So what went wrong? In the book’s second half, Linteau’s work falls short. He takes pains to minimize the role of Québec nationalism and other self-inflicted damage in Montréal’s decline. Indeed, it is true that Toronto overtook Montréal as Canada’s economic capital by 1960, long before the Parti Québécois’ victory. However, Linteau describes Montréal’s 1995 real estate nadir without mentioning the referendum of the same year. Linteau notes Montréal’s uncompetitive factories and lack of private investment but never asks whether Québec’s embrace of big government, dirigisme, and high taxes played a role. That is a significant omission in any account of the fall of Montréal as a capitalist city, akin to omitting the rise of competition in automotive manufacturing in any account of Detroit.

On a personal note, I grew up in Québec’s northern hinterlands, and I remember the frisson of walking down rue Sainte-Catherine Est with its concentration of tattoo parlours, peep shows and grimy fast-food joints. I lived in the city for a year but was drawn away from la belle province, first to Ottawa and now Calgary. Indeed, just like the Montréal of old, my Calgary apartment building is filled with newcomers – including many Indian IT workers (Calgary has almost three times as many corporate headquarters per capita as Montréal does). However, Linteau’s account reminds us how quickly things can change. Let The History of Montréal serve as a cautionary tale.

~

Olivier Ballou is Director of Communications at the Manning Centre for Building Democracy and the author of the Graphic Guide to Conservatism.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Ultimate Green-Washing: how LEED certification raises construction costs and worsens housing affordability while sidelining genuinely sustainable architecture.

The Ultimate Green-Washing: The False Promise of LEED Certification

Builders, developers and politicians have all avidly pursued LEED certification of major buildings and housing over the past several decades. Meant to be the pinnacle of “green” construction standards, LEED demands not just energy efficiency but the pursuit of many nakedly ideological goals like public transit use and even social equity. And its effects go far beyond virtue signalling and woke positioning. As this investigation by engineer Greg Wilson reveals, not only does LEED certification drive up construction costs and make housing affordability even more problematic, but buildings constructed to display its contradictory desires often consume more energy than traditional ones. Wilson calls for a return to sanity and a true form of sustainability: buildings that work well and will last for centuries.

B’nai Brith Canada and other Jewish groups back Canada’s “anti-hate” laws, including the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act – a bet on state power that Ezra Levant and John Carpay warn will backfire.

Misplaced Faith: Why B’nai Brith Canada and Other Jewish Groups Should Oppose “Anti-hate” Laws

That free speech has been fundamental to Judaism for over 3,000 years is especially admirable considering the innumerable anti-Semitic attacks that uncontrolled public discourse has emboldened over the centuries. The courage it takes to defend that principle in present-day Canada is beginning to fray, however, as prominent Jewish organizations like B’nai Brith Canada are backing Ottawa’s recurring expansion of “anti-hate” laws – most recently with the Combatting Hate Act and Online Harms Act. But such legislative cudgels never work, writes Lynne Cohen in this originally reported essay – and often end up being used to batter their original proponents. Seeking safety behind the power of the state, Cohen argues, is exactly the wrong approach. Free speech can be messy, unpleasant – and very hard to extend to one’s enemies – but the alternative is far worse.

“First One to Shine”: Reflections on My Indian Residential School Experience

If you want to learn the truth about a time and place, it would make sense to ask some of those who were there. In this heartfelt memoir, Elaine Ayoungman Clifton, who was born into the Siksika First Nation near Calgary, tells a story today’s activists don’t want you to hear. Far from an instrument of repression and evil, the Indian Residential School she attended for a decade was warm and welcoming, the teachers caring and conscientious. They instilled in her a love of reading, did not try to crush her language and culture, and did not try to separate her from her large family. “I am grateful for what they taught me and the care, friendship and love they gave to me over many years,” Ayoungman Clifton writes. If Canadians really want to respect the lived experience of all Indigenous people, hers is an authentic voice we should listen to.

More from this author

Why conservatives should stop worrying and start loving art

Yes a lot of contemporary art is left-wing agitprop. Yes it’s outrageous that taxpayers have to pay for it. And yes some artists take particular pleasure in producing art that makes conservative heads explode. So what? Get over it, writes Olivier Ballou. Art and artists are more politically diverse than conservatives think, and they are the tribunes of a free, democratic and prosperous society. Even the abstract artists!