Online Education and Home Schooling

Sean Speer
October 19, 2017
As Canada prepares for a second wave of the pandemic, many parents have decided to pause their careers in order to homeschool their children. Sean Speer argues the nexus of online learning and homeschooling offers many broad benefits to society that warrant government encouragement.

Online Education and Home Schooling

Sean Speer
October 19, 2017
As Canada prepares for a second wave of the pandemic, many parents have decided to pause their careers in order to homeschool their children. Sean Speer argues the nexus of online learning and homeschooling offers many broad benefits to society that warrant government encouragement.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Internet technology can seem at odds with localism. It enables us to reach beyond the limits of our communal surroundings to a world-wide network of disparate people and groups. The risk of course is that in the process it diminishes ties to family, neighbourhood, workplace, or school in favour of new, distant connections that are not as deep or meaningful as those they replace. The “little platoons” as Burke called them are swapped for what one might call “non-spatial associations.”

Yet some contend these new technological tools actually have the ability to boost traditional and local relationships. Wider access to new ideas and resources can strengthen and sustain local associations and communities. There are plenty of examples such as telemedicine or web-based retailing where info-tech is making Canadian communities more self-reliant. Localism and the “information society” can go hand in hand. Leading urban thinker Joel Kotkin calls it “a localist revival.”

One such example is the growing potential for homeschooling. Most Canadian families have tended to have no choice but to enroll their children in the public-school system. But technology is increasingly making alternative education – including homeschooling – a real option.

Previously homeschooling was generally limited to people of wealth and faith. Curriculum was hard to come by. Covering so many topics could be overwhelming for parents. Socialization was a concern. Subsequent post-secondary enrollment options were limited. Social perceptions were unsure and still evolving.

Technology is changing this. It’s revolutionizing how homeschooling is structured, delivered, and ultimately fits in the broader educational environment. It’s a powerful example of a technology-enabled restoration of localism.

Parents can now draw on a wide range of curriculum and web-based instruction. Virtual classrooms are bringing children from diverse backgrounds and experiences together. Neighbourhood or community-based schools staffed by the surplus of trained teachers are sprouting up. The upshot is homeschooling is increasingly mainstream, dynamic and sophisticated.

It comes at a key moment for public education. The liberal arts are increasingly undervalued. Technocratic utilitarianism as embodied in Ottawa’s so-called FutureSkills Lab is all the rage. A lack of intellectual diversity is precluding students from hearing new or different ideas. Test scores in key areas such as math are underwhelming. Government costs still continue to rise.

Alternative education models such as homeschooling can thus provide a useful ballast against these trends and offer parents and their children a new set of choices. An infusion of technology-enabled competition is just what our educational system needs.

New research by educational expert Deani van Pelt finds that homeschooling enrollments, while still modest, are growing across Canada. Nine of ten provinces witnessed increases in the number of students being homeschooled between 2007-08 and 2014-15.

Overall, the number of students officially enrolled as homeschooled in Canada grew by more than a third from 19,504 to 26,646 over this period. Alberta (just under 10,000) and Ontario (about 6,500) have the largest number of students. Manitoba (1.5 percent) is home to the largest share of its overall student population.

There are, of course, various reasons for this growth in homeschooling ranging from religious considerations to concerns about government curriculum to special circumstances (such as elite athletes or children with special needs) to an increasing prevalence of working from home.

But it’s not just practicality. Research finds that homeschooling is generally associated with positive educational outcomes. A 2011 study in the Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, for instance, found that homeschooled students in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick outperformed their public-school peers in math and reading. This research accords with similar findings elsewhere.

Considering these trends, there’s an increasing need for provincial policies to better enable and support homeschooling. Only Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia provide any financial support to parents who choose this educational choice. There’s also room for more thinking about how post-secondary institutions can better enable homeschooled students to advance to higher education. But the ultimate role for public policy is to establish a flexible policy framework with a light touch.

This is because the greatest appeal of the homeschooling movement is what U.S. public intellectual Yuval Levin calls “living models.” His point is that a rediscovery of civil society and the principle of subsidiarity will not be government led or policy induced. Those who care about these ideas should spend less time in the political arena trying to codify their preferences or values in national or provincial policy and instead focus more on living out them in their communities, neighbourhoods, and families. Homeschooling and other alternative education models are practical example of how people can adopt the “living model” in their own lives and local communities. That’s invariably worth more than dozens of policy papers or political donations or partisan rallies.

The nexus between technological development and homeschooling is positive. It’s expanding parental choice, challenging the public education monopoly, contributing to a better education system, and ultimately strengthening our local communities.


Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

In Case of Emergency, Read This! Alberta’s Covid-19 Report

Despite the wreckage wrought by the Covid-19 pandemic – social disintegration, ruined lives, physical and economic tolls – the governments and public officials who “managed” the emergency have been decidedly uninterested in assessing their performance. Except in Alberta, where a government-appointed panel just released its Final Report. Though predictably attacked by politicians, media and “experts” who can abide no dissent, the report makes many sensible recommendations, Barry Cooper finds. The report calls for emergency management experts – not doctors or health care bureaucrats – to be in charge when such disasters strike, with politicians who are accountable to the people making the key decisions. Most important, the report demands much stronger protection for the individual freedoms that panic-stricken governments and overbearing professional organizations so readily quashed.

The (Un)Remarkable Common Sense Revolution of Mike Harris

To his fans, former Ontario premier Mike Harris is a conservative icon, a leader who cut taxes, reduced government spending, made sensible education and welfare reforms and put Canada’s biggest province back on the road to prosperity. To his enemies he was a ruthless ideologue whose “Common Sense Revolution” ignored the weak and punished the poor. A new book of essays by seasoned political campaigners and prominent policy experts re-examines this polarizing figure and finds both strengths and weaknesses. Harris’ success on the big issues of the day, finds reviewer Sam Routley, shows that when it comes to actually governing a democracy, what matters most is a clear-headed willingness to just get things done.

State of Fear: How Obsessive Demands for Police Checks are Destroying the Volunteer Sector

Everyone wants to protect children. Everyone also appreciates the benefits of a robust and engaged volunteer sector. We should be able to have both at the same time. Yet many long-time volunteers are quitting and potential new entrants are skipping the experience altogether. With safety precautions overwhelming the volunteer sector, it is becoming increasingly difficult to give away one’s own labour. Using his personal experience as a guide, Peter Shawn Taylor takes a close look at the charitable sector’s current mania for police checks and other safety measures, the costs they impose on volunteers and whether they’re actually protecting our kids from sexual predators.

More from this author

Bridging the great populist-conservative divide

Some conservatives may think that the current populist insurgency consuming more and more oxygen on the Right is a new development. But you don’t need to go back too far to discover that conservative-populist debates have been part of Anglo-American conservatism for a long time. Sean Speer discovers a 1984 issue of National Review that asked the same basic questions as we’re currently confronting. How should conservatives think about populism? What’s its place in conservative politics and thought? Speer argues that the answer is that conservative reformers must put forward a positive agenda that responds to the issues animating the populists.

Speer C2C Journal Social Conservatism Libertarianism

All in the Right family

Conservatives and libertarians have had an on-again, off-again relationship for decades. They only win elections when they are united, and invariably lose them when they are divided. They are drawn together when ideological left-wing governments are in power, as they are in Ottawa and most of the big provinces today, and drift apart when conservative governments succumb to the temptations of power. Earlier this year, conservative Sean Speer and libertarian Matt Bufton debated the relationship at Carleton University. Speer’s opening remarks make the case for “Fusionism”; Bufton’s rebut will follow.

Searching for the soul of Canadian conservatism

Canada Post willing, a quarter million Canadians who belong to the Conservative Party are now receiving ballots enabling them to vote for their next leader. Of the 14 names on the ballot, at least one will have dropped off by the time the campaign ends May 27 and at least eight have no hope of winning. Among the five who could win, none is a perfect combination of principled conservative, party unifier, and ideal competitor to take on Justin Trudeau and the Liberals. So what should guide Conservatives in their choices? Take the long view, advises Sean Speer: vote to uphold the traditions of Canadian conservatism founded by Sir John A. Macdonald; to respect the size and role of the state in a free market economy envisaged by Adam Smith; to respect the role for customs and tradition championed by Edmund Burke; and to expand the positive contributions both libertarian and social conservatives have made to Canada over many generations. In other words, Conservatives should choose the leader they believe will best serve the traditional values and principles of their movement, rather the short-term interests of their party.

Share This Story


Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.