Cream puff diplomacy

Gerry Bowler
September 7, 2018
The term “gunboat diplomacy” was coined in 1850 when Britain dispatched the Royal Navy to defend a British citizen living in Greece. Last month, Canada’s Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland dispatched a tweet to defend Saudi Arabian women’s rights activists who happen to have a Canadian relative. Unlike the Greeks, the Saudis were not intimidated, and they fired back with trade and diplomatic weapons that cost Canada dearly. Gerry Bowler has some advice for Freeland, who apparently could use it: either ditch the impotent virtue signalling or hit the Saudis where it hurts by replacing their oil exports to Canada with homegrown western crude.

Cream puff diplomacy

Gerry Bowler
September 7, 2018
The term “gunboat diplomacy” was coined in 1850 when Britain dispatched the Royal Navy to defend a British citizen living in Greece. Last month, Canada’s Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland dispatched a tweet to defend Saudi Arabian women’s rights activists who happen to have a Canadian relative. Unlike the Greeks, the Saudis were not intimidated, and they fired back with trade and diplomatic weapons that cost Canada dearly. Gerry Bowler has some advice for Freeland, who apparently could use it: either ditch the impotent virtue signalling or hit the Saudis where it hurts by replacing their oil exports to Canada with homegrown western crude.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

In 1850 Lord Palmerston, the British government’s Foreign Secretary, threatened war when Greece dealt unjustly with one of Queen Victoria’s subjects who was living in Athens. The so-called “Don Pacifico Affair” represented perhaps the apotheosis of a nation’s willingness to support its citizens, no matter where they might be located, how few in number, or how modest their apparent significance. An important principle was at stake, the credibility of Britannia herself. Palmerston stated that his country was “bound to afford protection to our fellow subjects abroad … as the Roman, in days of old, held himself free from indignity, when he could say “Civis Romanus sum” [I am a Roman citizen]; so also a British subject, in whatever land he may be, shall feel confident that the watchful eye and the strong arm of England, will protect him against injustice and wrong.” Palmerston matched words to action, dispatching Royal Navy warships to blockade Athens and bottle up the tiny Greek navy. Britain had made her point and her citizen was compensated by Greece.

In August of this year, the government of Canada tweeted a statement of concern after Saudi Arabia arrested a couple of Saudi citizens who had been agitating for women’s rights inside the planet’s most Islamically conservative jurisdiction. Quite why Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland felt moved to this action is a puzzle. Stories are legion of stranded, imprisoned or otherwise troubled Canadians abroad receiving approximately zero assistance from the hapless or indifferent Canadian diplomatic service. Canada’s standard line is to warn its citizens to respect local laws, customs and justice systems, i.e., don’t expect any real action when trouble strikes.

So why did Freeland wade in here? Activists of all sorts are repressed, often fatally, around the world on a daily basis, and any national interest of ours in the Saudi case was of the most gossamer sort: one of those just arrested was, apparently, the sister of jailed Saudi blogger Raif Badawi, who is married to Ensaf Haidar, a woman with Canadian citizenship. Thus, Ottawa had superficially imitated Imperial Britain – minus the prestige of Empire and the muscle of the Royal Navy – while taking its presumption one step further: now any far-flung sister-in-law of a Canadian may utter “Civis Canadiensis sum” and feel assured that our Dominion will act on her behalf.

Things didn’t quite work out as Freeland evidently hoped. To the surprise of few except perhaps the minister, her staff, and whoever in the prime minister’s office presumably approved the intervention, Saudi Arabia did not welcome the righteous Twitter post in a spirit of chummy goodwill. Not only do all the imprisoned remain behind bars, but the kingdom instantly declared our ambassador persona non grata, pulled its own emissary out of Canada, and ordered a legion of Saudi students and medical patients home from the land of the interfering infidel. Trade deals were threatened, Canadian grain banned, Canadian assets sold off, and an ominous warning emerged on a Saudi government-linked website that seemed to promise Canada the same treatment Saudi terrorists gave the World Trade Center on 9/11. Considering that Canada was hoping soon to consummate a lucrative sale of military hardware to the Saudis, it would be fair to say that our well-meaning intervention could cost our country billions of dollars.

However startled our government might have been by the Arabian response, Ottawa was not about to back down. As the affair escalated, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated, “We will continue to stand up for Canadian values and universal values and human rights. Canada will always speak strongly and clearly in private and in public on questions of human rights.” So there, you Bedouin bullies.

This surely prompts the question: how much virtue signalling can our country afford? What will be the price tag of Canada’s demands that the United States and Mexico build our views on gender equity into the new NAFTA? How far are we willing to go to make our Canadian values count, let us say, in our economic and political relations with China? Are we willing to jeopardize our prosperity and squander our decidedly limited credibility by interfering in Korean, Indian, Russian, or Brazilian affairs? This is an important issue on which it is possible for reasonable Canadians to disagree. But we must have the debate, and soon.

Fortunately, there is a way in which we can both morally and profitably stand up to trade and diplomatic bullying by one of the world’s most noxious nations, a country which still thinks public crucifixion is a civilized response to crime, that makes homosexuality a capital crime, that routinely beheads criminals and enemies of the regime, and that prohibits Jews. Canada should immediately cease buying Saudi crude oil and replace it with western Canadian petroleum, transported securely by a revived Energy East pipeline. Quebec and Maritime consumers will thus be spared the sin of supporting an evil regime while seeing their fuel prices fall; the western Canadian economy will get a lift from its extended doldrums; and Wahhabi fundamentalists will rend their beards in impotent rage. As Minister Freeland chirped recently about what she’s hoping to salvage from the NAFTA imbroglio she’s also currently tangled up in, that could be a genuine win-win-win for Canada.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Unbearable Wokeness of Being in Stratford

Among 2020’s many unfortunate pandemic casualties was the Stratford Festival. Today it’s anybody’s guess how, when or whether the beloved cultural institution, held annually in the Ontario town named for the hometown of William Shakespeare, can restart. But, writes Grant A. Brown, serious wounds were already being inflicted upon the festival – from within. A Stratford resident and business owner, Brown brings a lifelong Shakespeare lover’s perspective to his dissection of the progressive degradation of the great playwright’s greatest works and the garbling of his eternally revealing insights into human nature.

Portrait black and white shot of Sir John A. Macdonald.

Sir John A. Macdonald Saved More Native Lives Than Any Other Prime Minister

Were he alive today, Sir John A. Macdonald would make short work of his many present-day critics through his legendarily quick wit, disarming personality and mastery of the facts. Unfortunately, he isn’t around to defend himself against horrifying claims he committed genocide against Canada’s Indigenous people. To take on this calumny, Greg Piasetzki goes back to the source. Using Macdonald’s own words and other contemporary voices, Piasetzki brings alive our Founding Father’s determination to save native lives and protect their interests throughout his time in office.

Black women is pictured against mural, begging questions of political correctness in the history of slavery in Quebec.

Angélique – The Politically Correct Rewrite of Quebec Slavery

Slavery is an outrage, pure and simple, truly one where it is accurate to say “even one is too many”. But even slavery requires context. Out of the more than 12 million Africans captured and shipped across the Atlantic, by the year 1700 precisely six were held in what would later become Quebec. So how and why did La Belle Province decide to upend the truth of its past? In this version of an essay that appeared originally in the Dorchester Review, Frédéric Bastien chronicles Quebec’s bizarre orgy of “historical correctness” and the damage it is doing to memory, truth and perspective.

More from this author

The Unbearable Wokeness of Being in Stratford

Among 2020’s many unfortunate pandemic casualties was the Stratford Festival. Today it’s anybody’s guess how, when or whether the beloved cultural institution, held annually in the Ontario town named for the hometown of William Shakespeare, can restart. But, writes Grant A. Brown, serious wounds were already being inflicted upon the festival – from within. A Stratford resident and business owner, Brown brings a lifelong Shakespeare lover’s perspective to his dissection of the progressive degradation of the great playwright’s greatest works and the garbling of his eternally revealing insights into human nature.

Jordan Peterson versus the Crybullies

The woke mob has long gunned for Jordan Peterson. The latest would-be censors are weepy Random House Canada employees who want to stop the sequel to Peterson’s wildly successful 12 Rules for Life. Cockburn, writing in Spectator US, wonders why the Wokesters then seem okay with their employer publishing Hitler and Nietzsche.

Elites and the Green Economy

The Rockefeller Brothers helped launched the environmental movement 50 years ago by embracing the Club of Rome’s no-growth dogma. Today America’s corporate aristocracy advocates radical climate policy. In American Greatness, Joel Kotkin counsels that reducing human consumption spares the wealthy while handing the bill to the poor.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.