Thinking Clearly in a Time of Panic

George Koch
March 24, 2020
How should the conservative mind respond to the coronavirus pandemic? Panic and despair are in ample supply, and the urge to succumb appears widespread. Others have steered, via deliberate ignorance, to fatalism, though the walls are closing in on such rebels. Both extremes are beneath thoughtful conservatives. C2C Editor-in-Chief George Koch counsels that however dark today might appear, the eternal search for objective truth – the foundation for all conservative thought – is the first necessary step along the path to seeing humankind through to brighter days.

Thinking Clearly in a Time of Panic

George Koch
March 24, 2020
How should the conservative mind respond to the coronavirus pandemic? Panic and despair are in ample supply, and the urge to succumb appears widespread. Others have steered, via deliberate ignorance, to fatalism, though the walls are closing in on such rebels. Both extremes are beneath thoughtful conservatives. C2C Editor-in-Chief George Koch counsels that however dark today might appear, the eternal search for objective truth – the foundation for all conservative thought – is the first necessary step along the path to seeing humankind through to brighter days.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

…The animal in whom the light of reason shines, and who looks at us from eyes which tell of freedom. — Sir Roger Scruton

These are confusing times. Not solely concerning how many people might still die, as important as that is. Will the world go the way of Italy, where some 600-800 per day are succumbing? (The numbers vary continually, as you can appreciate.) Or might certain (so far) more fortunate Canadian provinces become a model for well-run jurisdictions? Alberta, for example, has a reported stock of nearly 700 ventilators – and at last count just 18 people hospitalized for COVID-19, with mercifully just one death. Nor does our confusion mainly concern whether Canadian Tire or Costco might next join other retailers in closing, or whether outdoor exercise is  good (as most officials in my province are still saying) or bad (as in Halifax, where as of Sunday setting foot in a city park, beach or playground can get you a massive fine).

The confusion goes far beyond that, right to how we should think, feel and respond to the coronavirus and the surrounding social, economic and political upheaval. What does it mean to be a conservative in these times? I do not mean in terms of evaluating policies and government actions. It is more basic than that. I mean in terms of how conservatism – be that a fully formed political philosophy or, more commonly, a looser collection of views, instincts and ways of acting – might help guide our individual inner lives. For these are what this crisis threatens to upend.

I’m not here to tell you what to think or who to believe. There’s too much of that already. Instead, a few thoughts on being a conservative in these times. 

First of all, a conservative does not panic. We endure. There are several reasons for that. We believe in the fundamental validity of Western Civilization, and it has been around for a rather long time – over 2,600 years if we take the laws of ancient Greece as the starting point, and another 800 if we go by our very wellspring, the Book of Genesis. 

We know that human beings are innately flawed and that the human story has an irreducibly tragic element (if not exactly being a “march of folly” as some have called it). And yet we are still here, and our own era is in many respects the pinnacle of human achievement. So we can be confident we will get through this. Remind yourself of that often; that alone should help quell the urge to panic.

As conservatives, we know something of history and we value it – not just its lessons but its mere existence. We respect what our ancestors endured and achieved and, therefore, we continue to believe in the future. We don’t just “live in the moment”. So we know that humanity has been through far worse – unimaginably worse, innumerable times and in innumerable forms. 

Great Britain did not manage to continue fighting the entire Axis group of powers – all of global fascism – alone and virtually unaided, for 18 months out of the nearly-six-year Second World War because her people panicked. Nor because her leaders and others who should know better fomented panic. 

And so today we also know that when an elected politician or corporate leader, sweat beading on their brow and naked animal fear in their glazed eyes, declares this an “unprecedented” situation, they are speaking nonsense. As well as revealing a fevered state of mind and probably indicating something of the quality of their thinking. 

This latest viral eruption out of China is unprecedented only if you were hatched from an egg in the last decade, fully formed but with a mind containing not an iota of knowledge about the past. Obviously, if Canada or any of its provinces replicated the epidemiological track of northern Italy, our health care system – and much besides – would be overwhelmed. But we are a long way from that, and there’s evidence that Italy’s situation is unique. 

Which is not to say we should feel indifferent, succumb to cynicism or act recklessly. Far from it. The imperative of responsibility, our moral duty to our fellow human and our very belief in preserving civilization all counsel against that. But our choices are not binary: unchecked fear (leading to abject submission) or recklessness. (Although here again, loud voices are implying that it is binary.) Both of those states are fundamentally mindless. Both are the enemies of sound judgment, including the ability to absorb and interpret scientific information. 

There is a third state and approach that is inimitably, beautifully conservative: prudence. It appears in short supply; we need more of it. Prudence is, above all, shaped and steered by mindfulness. Indeed, the worse things get, the more urgent the need not to panic, to see clearly and to follow the truth, including the findings of scientific observation and testing, wherever it may lead.

For conservatives believe in the existence of objective truth and that this truth is discoverable. Even if we don’t worship the Enlightenment, we greatly appreciate its contribution and legacy. This is something conservatives of all stripes can agree on: Burkean and Lockean, as well as the more modern U.S. schools and, most important, the great mass of us who don’t wear political science labels.

Accordingly, we understand and assert the central importance of the human being’s faculty of reason. This is also the basis of science. This and our moral sense are what truly separate us from animals. In these times of uncontrolled emotion, they are more relevant than ever. They will be of life and death importance. 

Our therapeutic era, of course, emphasizes how we feel about things, and regards our intentions (“commitments”) as decisive in expressing our virtue and establishing our moral worth. A trend that goes back several decades, it has struck conservative thinkers as deeply worrisome if not sinister. 

This mindset – often mixed bizarrely with unreflective exhortations to “listen to what the science says”, reducing the scientific method and the good it can bring to political sloganeering – currently appears to dominate in many (though, thankfully, by no means all) quarters. If unchecked, it would seem capable of unhinging our entire governing apparatus and, perhaps, society itself. That is what most concerns me.

Conservatives through the ages have resisted two extremes of human politics and psychology: the siren song of utopianism and the self-destructive bleakness of despair. Accordingly, when times are good and seem on an unending upward flight, we can appear boringly cautious or strangely unimaginative. When times are bad and spiralling downward without apparent end, we can seem weirdly optimistic. 

In times of intense crisis, the very act of counselling reason, the refusal to share their despair, drives the apocalyptically-minded into a rage. Another tough but necessary task for conservatives, for the willingness to confront fear, danger and intimidation – including the unchecked passions of the emotionally unhinged, and numerous they can be – is the Classical form of courage.

Some of you might be thinking this is leading to a call for a renewal of religious faith. It isn’t. I know what I believe. But this piece is about something we should all be able to agree on: reason. I will say this is the time to turn to family and friends, to draw strength from one another and, insofar as you are able, to help one another.

You might also note that I haven’t touched on government policy nor ventured any predictions. This isn’t about what I think. This is about all of us guarding our ability to think for ourselves and, accordingly, to preserve our moral freedom. 

In times such as these, it’s more important than ever that we live in truth.

George Koch is Editor-in-Chief of the C2C Journal.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Fake News Fake-Out

The news business is at its least reliable when reporting on itself. Coverage of a media company’s own financial results, for example, is inevitably glowing and upbeat, whatever the actual figures might say. The same thing holds for concerns over “fake news”. Seizing on recent panic about the spread of misinformation, and thanks to a generous federal grant, Canada’s legacy newspapers have devised their own system for identifying fake news. But as Peter Shawn Taylor discovers, the criteria strangely celebrate their own product at the expense of their many online competitors. And much of it contradicts the basic rules of good journalism.

Hating Jordan Peterson

Who kicks a person when they’re down? Who dresses up their own resentment, spite or ideological fervour as analysis? One doesn’t need to agree with Jordan Peterson’s every idea to regard his recent comeback from the brink of death, destruction and oblivion as welcome, commendable and inspiring. At least worth a shred of empathy. But not from the more doctrinaire of his woke Left critics. As Janice Fiamengo finds, they aren’t just revelling in the popular author’s misfortune but are committing what they normally consider an unforgivable sin: blaming the victim.

George Orwell on the Myanmar Coup

“The whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought”, George Orwell wrote in his famous novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. “In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.” Orwell understood that whoever controls language controls political thought. And such an insight is as applicable to Myanmar in 2021 as it was to Oceania in 1984. Using Orwell as his guide, and relying on his extensive personal contacts throughout the country, C2C Journal associate editor Patrick Keeney takes a close look at reality and meaning in the recent coup in Myanmar.

More from this author

Why It’s Wrong to Punish Politicians Who Went Away for the Holidays

Influence-peddling. Self-dealing. Nepotism. Junketeering. The ways politicians can betray the public trust are legion. But should this list include behaviour that not only abides by the law, but offers a welcome example of independent thought and self-care? Politicians from diverse parties across Canada have been excoriated and, in some instances, dramatically punished for going abroad for personal reasons during the holiday season. While this may contravene government “recommendations” to stay home, C2C Journal editor George Koch argues passionately that all Canadians – including those whom we elected – should be allowed to act as the law permits. And that includes international travel.

Choosing Your Own Adventure in a Time of Pandemic

The barriers to travelling for personal reasons certainly appear daunting. They range from shifting government restrictions to the moral pressure from risk-averse peers to the slight but real probability of contracting the virus. Plus the prospect of getting stranded overseas. Daunting they are. But insurmountable? Or merely not worth the benefits in pleasure, renewed personal connections, emotional wellbeing and horizon-broadening? C2C Editor-in Chief George Koch decided to find out for himself, venturing to Europe in mid-September for three weeks. He returns with a take that we hope helps demystify the process and encourages people to keep an open mind.

The Creeping Politicization of Pension Management

Everyone can agree public pension funds should be protected from political interference. But such abuse comes in several forms, some stealthier than others. Unaccountable investment managers indulging in the latest fads and activist demands – energy transition, anyone? – pose perhaps the greatest threat of all to retirees’ returns. George Koch argues that, paradoxically, elected office-holders are the public’s best defence against politically-motivated and potentially ruinous pension fund shenanigans.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.