Energy Politics

Fossil Fuel Follies

Gwyn Morgan
January 29, 2022
Reliable, affordable and plentiful energy has been foundational to prosperity in every successful country, and fossil fuels have fulfilled the vast majority of those needs – and continue to. What’s not to like? But if you believe the world is gripped by a “climate emergency” caused by those very fuels, then virtually anything is justifiable to get rid of them. But if, in fact, there are no viable replacements, the results are grotesque performative pantomimes of actual serious energy policies: the “net zero” movement. It aims to defeat and negate not only economics, engineering and common sense but the laws of physics themselves. Gwyn Morgan reviews this world-touring theatre of the absurd and finds there’s no vaccine strong enough to inoculate against global dysfunction.
Energy Politics

Fossil Fuel Follies

Gwyn Morgan
January 29, 2022
Reliable, affordable and plentiful energy has been foundational to prosperity in every successful country, and fossil fuels have fulfilled the vast majority of those needs – and continue to. What’s not to like? But if you believe the world is gripped by a “climate emergency” caused by those very fuels, then virtually anything is justifiable to get rid of them. But if, in fact, there are no viable replacements, the results are grotesque performative pantomimes of actual serious energy policies: the “net zero” movement. It aims to defeat and negate not only economics, engineering and common sense but the laws of physics themselves. Gwyn Morgan reviews this world-touring theatre of the absurd and finds there’s no vaccine strong enough to inoculate against global dysfunction.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Last year saw an intensification of the great march to “net zero,” aimed at replacing the 84 percent of global energy supplied by fossil fuels. The pursuit of this unrealistic objective featured actions ranging from the impractical to the hypocritical to the simply bizarre. It would be impossible to attend in person every performance of this global romp of political theatre, so here instead is my condensed list of what I’ll call the Fossil Fuel Follies.

xThe bizarre and the hypocritical: A recent “art installation” shrouded Paris’s famous Arc de Triomphe (top) in plastic – a substance France wants to ban. Norway’s huge Johan Sverdrup oilfield (bottom) will produce 720,000 barrels per day and generate more than US$100 billion in export revenue – even as Norway’s government demands all its citizens drive electric cars. (Sources of photos: (top) Delmarty J/ANDBZ/ABACAPRESS, (bottom) Ole Jørgen Bratland)

The Bizarre – The City of Paris celebrated a “monumental” new artwork that consisted of shrouding the massive Arc de Triomphe in a silver and blue fabric. Turns out that fabric is plastic, a product the French government is aiming to ban. And plastic is made from petroleum that France wants phased out to achieve “net zero.”

Energy Ignorance – New York City has decided to combat global warming by replacing natural gas with electricity to heat new buildings. But half of New York’s electricity is generated by natural gas and other fossil fuels. As electricity consumption rises to heat those new buildings, the natural gas “saved” on heat will be burned to generate electricity.

Scandinavian Hypocrisy – Norway has mandated that all new cars sold by 2025 must be electric. Meanwhile, the country produces 4 million barrels of oil per day and is developing new fields to increase production. The export of crude oil is also the main reason Norwegians are prosperous enough to afford EVs.

The Hydrogen Charade – This Globe and Mail article published last August called hydrogen “the most abundant element in the universe.” That’s true about the universe, where hydrogen fuels stars including our sun. But usable hydrogen does not naturally exist on our planet Earth. Usable hydrogen is manufactured in refineries fuelled by natural gas and coal. Hydrogen industry advocates try to counter this by pointing to electrolysis of water using wind and solar power to generate the electricity. This is an impractical and extremely costly approach to creating something that’s supposedly abundant.

Caisse de Depot’s Greenwashing – Quebec’s provincial pension fund says it will divest of oil production assets by the end of the year. No mention of divesting assets that require oil to function, including airports, highways and marine shipping terminals.

Cryptocurrency’s Overlooked Environmental Impact – The Bank of Canada last year increased its work on the feasibility of adopting a digital currency. But there’s no mention of examining the environmental impact of cryptocurrency. Most cryptocurrencies utilize the ultra-complex block-chain technology. Minting new units such as Bitcoin, the first and still the leading cryptocurrency, requires a highly energy-intensive process called “mining.” The electrical power required to mine a single transaction generates an average carbon footprint equivalent to processing over 2 million VISA transactions. Bitcoin as a whole was using more electricity last year than the entire country of Finland. At least one crypto mining outfit has actually purchased a decommissioned coal-fired power plant to generate electricity to run its computers.

xThe real costs of going green: Coal-fired power plant in Pennsylvania (left) purchased by Stronghold Digital Mining to power 1,800 computers for Bitcoin processing; the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline (right) will supply Russian natural gas to its emerging energy hostage, Germany, whose wind-and-solar crusade has flopped. (Source of left photo: Stronghold)

Germany’s Journey from Self-sufficiency to Russian Energy Hostage – Last year saw the culmination of Germany’s 11-year-long process of shutting down its zero-emission nuclear power plants. That incomprehensible decision was based on a plan to replace the lost power with wind and solar which, predictably, proved both prohibitively expensive and unreliable. That left no alternative but to import more natural gas from Russia. But those supplies have proven inadequate. The ostensible solution is still more Russian gas through a new pipeline across the Baltic Sea called Nord Stream 2.

Last March, the German government approved the project, but the escalating Ukraine crisis has led to pressure from its NATO allies to cancel that approval. Now, just as freezing temperatures drive German natural gas prices up ten-fold, Russia has reduced deliveries. Earlier this month, International Energy Agency Executive Director Fatih Barol stated, “I would note that today’s low Russian gas flows coincide with heightened geopolitical tensions over Ukraine.” It’s breathtaking to think both that this geopolitical mess started with the belief that wind and solar could be the answer to any large country’s energy future, and that anyone believed Russia would not exploit its energy supplies as a geopolitical weapon.

xDown the chute: Under COP26, only Western economies are expected to strangle themselves in the rush to “net zero.” In China, India and other developing nations, coal remains king and overall fossil fuel use will soar for decades to come. (Sources of photos: Shutterstock)

Canada Leads COP26 – In the Size of its Delegation – Canada sent 276 delegates to the UN Climate Summit in Glasgow, more than host UK and twice as many as the United States. Among the Prime Minister’s entourage were his own personal videographer, photographer, speechwriter and a 17-person media team made up of press secretaries and communications directors. The number of emissions-intensive private jets required to transport this mega-team was not disclosed. All this ludicrous vanity-driven hype for a country that accounts for less than 2 percent of global emissions.

COP26 Hypocrisy – The main objective of COP26 was to “phase out” coal-fired power. But in the face of opposition from China and India, the world’s two largest coal consumers, the language was changed to “phase down.” China and India currently produce 36 percent of global emissions. Fact-checked data from the Global Coal Plant Tracker shows China has 202 coal-fired power plants under construction or pre-construction, while India has 74 such plants under construction or pre-construction. This trend has no end in sight; Chinese leader Xi recently stated that he will not allow climate change-driven policies to imperil the prosperity of China’s citizenry. The expected life of those coal-using plants is more than 30 years, negating the combined emissions reduction efforts of all other COP26 parties. If Canada were to disappear from the map, India and China’s emissions growth would replace our emissions in less than a year.

The years go by, but global dysfunction remains endemic, spinning off endless variants.

Gwyn Morgan is a retired business leader who has been a director of five global corporations.

Source of main photo: Shutterstock.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

More from this author

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

From the Strait of Hormuz to Cuba, Net Zero is Dying – Mark Carney Needs to Let Go

After decades spent pursuing net-zero dreams at great cost to their economies and social fabric, most of the world’s industrialized nations are waking back up. War with Iran and the threat of tanker blockades have everyone worried about oil and natural gas supplies and clamouring for energy security. Or nearly everyone. Not Mark Carney, though. Canada’s prime minister keeps pushing industrial carbon taxes higher and insists on wasting taxpayers’ money on windmills that make no difference. Gwyn Morgan recalls his own observation of the global warming movement’s original rise, its morphing into the radical “net zero” cult – and its spectacular global disintegration. It is high time, Morgan writes, that Canadians demand Carney also drop his delusions.

Future Tense: Why Gen Z is Right to Feel Betrayed

Older generations often roll their eyes when young people seek to blame them for their woes. But if Canada’s Gen Zers feel betrayed by the Boomers, they are right to do so, argues Gwyn Morgan. Years of irresponsible fiscal and regulatory policies have hamstrung the Canadian economy and left younger generations facing a bleak future of stagnant wages, rising taxes and shrinking opportunities. A former business leader who created more than his share of jobs and prosperity during his long corporate career, Morgan casts a worried eye over the next generation – and offers sympathy for the situation they’re inheriting.