For the past 40 years my mother has gone swimming several times per week at her local pool in Ottawa. Beginning in her teens and continuing off and on throughout her life, she swam competitively on teams and even competed in triathlons. Her local pool has served both as her training ground and as her go-to destination for regular exercise. After decades, she knows most of the other regular swimmers, some of whom have become good friends. The pool has been a central part of her life for years now. But this year, her once-innocuous activity became unsafe.
About two months ago, my mother finished her usual swim and as always went to the women’s changerooms to shower. She and the other ladies – also regulars at the Nepean Sportsplex – chatted in the showers, catching up on news as they always do. My mother wrapped herself in a towel as she stepped out of the shower. There, facing away from her, was a naked man. Shocked, my mother hurried over to a corner of the changeroom to get dressed. The man, now standing across the changeroom, was over six feet tall, with a combover. He got dressed, turned around and, in my mother’s words, “leered” at her, then left the changeroom.
Shaken, my mother rushed over to her friend, asking if she had seen “the man in the women’s changeroom.” The other woman nervously confirmed that yes, she had. They continued their conversation in hushed voices. Both were afraid. Both felt violated. Neither woman said anything to community centre staff.
My mother is 66 years old and no shrinking violet. A longtime journalist, her writing reflects her heterodox views and tenacity for challenging dominant narratives. I have never known her in any circumstance to shy away from confrontation. In the decades she has been swimming at this pool, she has had several run-ins with the lifeguards, management and other swimmers. From too-slow swimmers clogging up the fast lane to the Covid-19-related mask mandates that she opposed, my mother has always fearlessly spoken her mind. During the pandemic she fought back so relentlessly against the absurd requirement to wear a mask on the pool deck for the few moments before entering the water that we worried she might end up in handcuffs. She wasn’t charged, but her protests at another facility did get her a short suspension from all Ottawa-area pools.
Yet when an obvious man walked naked through the changeroom while she was in her most vulnerable state, my mother went silent.
Ten years ago, such an incident would have been viewed unequivocally as a crime. Someone would have called the police and the man would almost certainly have been arrested. He would likely have been charged with voyeurism and perhaps even labelled a sexual predator. But in this instance, not one woman in the changeroom dared speak up, complain or request help from staff in dealing with the issue.
Until very recently these women would have been considered the vulnerable population in this situation, and had the force of both social norms and the law on their side. Yet now they were self-silencing. Why? We all know why: with four magic words – “I am a woman” – the intruder and potential predator became the vulnerable one, thereby protected from criticism, punishment or any other accountability. Today’s political climate demands he be welcomed with open and loving arms into the female-only spaces, and that anyone who says different is labelled not only insensitive but hateful.
The most astounding part of this story is that no one in the changeroom even asked whether he identified as a man or a woman. (The door to the women’s changeroom is clearly marked as such, so there’s virtually no way the man could have mistakenly stumbled into the wrong changeroom.) For all anyone knows, this male individual may have been unaware that he had access to a convenient legal loophole. For all we know, he might have answered, “Of course I’m a man, but I just wanted to undress in the women’s changeroom.” Why then, did not a single woman say anything?
I was afraid for my mother, for myself and for my daughter. How could I ever safely take her to the pool or any other place where she would have to undress, knowing that at any moment she could be exposed to a naked man?
After my mother told me what happened to her, my initial reaction, like that of my father’s, was outrage. I was furious. To my mind, she was the victim of a crime. I kept asking her, “Why didn’t you say something?” Her answer was, “What’s the point?”
I remained disturbed and shaken for the rest of the day. I had to force the incident out of my mind just to function, to take care of my kids, to act normal. I was afraid for my mother, for myself and for my daughter. How could I ever safely take her to the pool or any other place where she would have to undress, knowing that at any moment she could be exposed to a naked man? But beyond that, I was afraid for the entire world.
Beloved Harry Potter series author J.K. Rowling has come under vicious attack for expressing “transphobic” views in defense of women’s right to speak meaningfully of their lives – but so far has stuck to her position. (Source of top photo: AP Photo/Lisa Poole)
There is a saying, “Where there is no God, there is absurdity.” I am a religious person and believe this statement in a literal sense. I believe that human beings are not only physical beings but deeply spiritual ones. Once our food and shelter are managed, we search for meaning. Humans have souls that require sustenance just as our stomachs do. A higher power and religion meet the needs of our spiritual longing and free our minds to deal with this physical world and its infinite challenges.
But I also believe that, in the above quotation, “God” can be interpreted to mean “objective and universal truths” – transcendent truths, immune to the whims of man. Where there is no truth, there is absurdity. Postmodernism and gender ideology have helped society cast off the “chains” of objective, universal and verifiable truths. Mercurial self-identification is now the North Star that guides us. We left both God and truth and are now knee-deep in absurdity.
I won’t attempt to address the massive tragedy – or outrage – that is decades of hard-fought-for women’s rights eroded within just a handful of years by aggressive gender ideology and the claim that “trans women are women.” Some far more prominent women – J.K. Rowling, Martina Navratilova, Riley Gaines, to name three – have taken this issue head-on.
I’m just a little person: a stay-at-home mom trying to launch each of my children into this world. But what is a world or society where a woman’s privacy and protected space are violated and she can’t speak up because the voices who control the public narrative will turn on her and call her a bigot? Where a person cannot name a crime and perpetrator? Where a person cannot speak the truth about the reality before her eyes?
If there are only two sexes, the man in my mother’s story is not allowed in the women’s changeroom. If sex is a social construct and can change through self-declaration or self-perception, that man can be a woman and is therefore allowed in the women’s changeroom.
Increasingly, Western societies – especially the English-speaking countries – are becoming two different peoples speaking two very different languages and believing in two modes of living. One camp believes in some form of objective truth and labels humans as either male or female. They acknowledge there are endless variations in the ways humans express themselves, but they are certain there are only two sexes. The concept of two sexes is so ancient and fundamental to our makeup as a species, we’re still wrapping our heads around having to verbalize what was always common sense. Defending the obvious is exhausting.
The other camp believes in a post-modernist version of constructed truth in which there are dozens of “fluid” genders that negate sex and biology. They also believe that anyone who does not subscribe to this belief is a heretic and as evil as a Nazi. They have the news and entertainment media, most of academia, much of the corporate world, and more and more of the state apparatus (from educational bureaucracies to human rights commissions) on their side.
How do these two camps speak to one another? The two belief systems require very different laws and social norms. If there are only two sexes, the man in my mother’s story is not allowed in the women’s changeroom. If sex is a social construct and can change through self-declaration or self-perception, that man can be a woman and is therefore allowed in the women’s changeroom. Right now, it seems the latter camp is winning and that we no longer share a common understanding of basic truths or even of language. Words like “man” or “woman” that were once universal are no longer.
A society that does not have a shared language cannot share thoughts. A society that is divided on whether or not there is objective truth, outside of personal feelings and emotions, cannot set laws or policies that work for the broadest range of people. A society where women and girls are cowed into silence when a crime is perpetrated against them for fear of being labelled the enemy is a shaky society indeed.
Lindsy Danzinger is a stay-at-home mom who home-schools her three children. She lives with her husband and children in Toronto.
A slightly shorter version of this article was originally published in Feminist Current (republished with permission). It was lightly edited by C2C Journal for style and context.
Source of main image: Shutterstock.