Stories

“Occupy” Some Common Sense

C2C Journal
November 16, 2011
If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense.
Stories

“Occupy” Some Common Sense

C2C Journal
November 16, 2011
If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

The news that the New York City police department has evicted “Occupy Wall Street” protesters is a positive sign that that parks meant for the general public will now be given back to that same public.  In light of the eviction of the two month-old tent city in lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park, and Oakland’s recent eviction of Occupy squatters, perhaps sanity and civility will return to the town squares across North America. That said, as per usual, Canada’s city councils are taking their sweet time in evicting our own squatters.

Let’s be honest. Much of the Occupy movement was recycled 1960s activism (and in some cases, recycled 1960s activists) who hate business, despise capitalists and bathe themselves in envy. Insofar as they had an occasional point—governments should not rescue banks and automotive companies—they overlooked others: governments didn’t get economies around the world into trouble by spending too little, but by spending too much. And they massively borrowed on top of the existing tax take to do it both where taxes were moderate (America) and where they were not (Greece).

Such unconscionable borrowing for decades is why Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are a fiscal mess, and why California and other American states are broke.

If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense. They can start with recognizing that governments in the United States, Europe and even Canada have put the younger generations into a severe disadvantage, not through too little government intervention but by too much.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

More from this author

Letter from the Editors:
Happy Canada Day!

Celebrating the fact of one’s country’s existence, its survival through the adversities of history and its positive or uplifting attributes is a fact of life the world over, even in tyrannies and oligarchies. Nearly everyone can find something to love about the place they call home. Yet this is apparently not the case for many inhabitants of present-day Canada, who claim that what was once the self-described “greatest country in the world” has suddenly become a systemically racist hell-hole. Despite such pressure from the woke mob and their elite enablers, however, the editors of C2C Journal find much that is not merely defensible about Canada, but praiseworthy and downright glorious.

Did Canada’s first immigrants fall from the sky?

Aboriginal grievance and entitlement stories made a lot of news in Canada in June. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau renamed National Aboriginal Day as National Indigenous Peoples Day. He also renamed his office to erase its historic link to Hector Langevin, an architect of the residential schools system. And he gave the old American embassy in Ottawa to native groups. Still aboriginal activists weren’t satisfied. So they badgered an apology out of Governor General David Johnston for calling First Nations peoples immigrants. Which left the author of this story wondering, where on or off earth do these insatiably aggrieved activists come from?

The Revolution Eats a Few More of its Own

In 1972 Lou Reed offended conservatives with his hit Walk on the Wild Side, an admiring ode to his transgendered friend Holly, who left Miami as a he and became a she on the way to New York. In 2017 the song has offended progressives as a transphobic example of cultural appropriation. In this article by C2C Staff, the Journal explains what a long, strange trip it’s been from conservative censorship to progressive censorship.