“Occupy” Some Common Sense

C2C Journal
November 16, 2011
If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense.

“Occupy” Some Common Sense

C2C Journal
November 16, 2011
If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter


The news that the New York City police department has evicted “Occupy Wall Street” protesters is a positive sign that that parks meant for the general public will now be given back to that same public.  In light of the eviction of the two month-old tent city in lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park, and Oakland’s recent eviction of Occupy squatters, perhaps sanity and civility will return to the town squares across North America. That said, as per usual, Canada’s city councils are taking their sweet time in evicting our own squatters.

Let’s be honest. Much of the Occupy movement was recycled 1960s activism (and in some cases, recycled 1960s activists) who hate business, despise capitalists and bathe themselves in envy. Insofar as they had an occasional point—governments should not rescue banks and automotive companies—they overlooked others: governments didn’t get economies around the world into trouble by spending too little, but by spending too much. And they massively borrowed on top of the existing tax take to do it both where taxes were moderate (America) and where they were not (Greece).

Such unconscionable borrowing for decades is why Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain are a fiscal mess, and why California and other American states are broke.

If the Occupy movement returns, we suggest they come back with a coherent set of demands and common sense. They can start with recognizing that governments in the United States, Europe and even Canada have put the younger generations into a severe disadvantage, not through too little government intervention but by too much.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The First-Past-the-Post Way of Voting is Better-than-the-Rest

To hear proponents tell it, proportional representation is the cure for all that ails Canadian democracy. It’s fairer, less divisive, more diverse, makes voters happier and is less prone to “strategic” voting. About the only thing it apparently can’t do is make childbirth painless. But could replacing our traditional first-past-the-post voting system really improve how Canada is governed – and how Canadians feel about their government? In his grand-prize-winning entry to the 1st Annual Patricia Trottier and Gwyn Morgan Student Essay Contest, Nolan Albert weighs the arguments for and against replacing first-past-the-post with proportional representation, and in doing so uncovers the real cause of voter dissatisfaction.

The Runaway Costs of Government Construction Projects

Ottawa’s post-pandemic $300 billion spending orgy was coupled with the pompous claim to “Build Back Better”. As it happened, most of that spending was recklessly borrowed – stoking inflation – while Build Back Better was a dud, was discarded in embarrassment and, if recalled at all today, is told as a sick joke. Far too many planned projects now sink into a quicksand of political haggling, regulatory overkill, mission creep, design complexity and, if built at all, bungled execution. Looking at specific examples, Gwyn Morgan presents the lamentable results: far less is actually getting built across Canada, nearly everything takes forever and – worst of all – costs routinely soar to ludicrous levels. Added to that, Morgan notes, are woke-based criteria being imposed by the Trudeau government that are worsening the vicious cycle.

Adam Smith’s “Saline Solution” for Canada’s Health Care System

That Canada’s health care system is ailing is no longer news. That it is not only victim but perpetrator – killing patients through indifference and neglect – is also increasingly understood. But is Canada’s publicly funded and operated monopoly health care system an economy of sorts, a set of relationships that can be understood in economic terms, and one that might lend itself to reform by applying economic principles? In the second of three prize-winning entries from the 1st Annual Patricia Trottier and Gwyn Morgan Student Essay Contest to be published by C2C Journal, Alicia Kardos answers a resounding “Yes”. Drawing on key ideas and principles of the genius from Kirkcaldy, Scotland, Kardos envisions an overhauled health care system in which incentives are rational, self-interest is rewarded and the consumer – the patient – is king.

More from this author

Letter from the Editors:
Happy Canada Day!

Celebrating the fact of one’s country’s existence, its survival through the adversities of history and its positive or uplifting attributes is a fact of life the world over, even in tyrannies and oligarchies. Nearly everyone can find something to love about the place they call home. Yet this is apparently not the case for many inhabitants of present-day Canada, who claim that what was once the self-described “greatest country in the world” has suddenly become a systemically racist hell-hole. Despite such pressure from the woke mob and their elite enablers, however, the editors of C2C Journal find much that is not merely defensible about Canada, but praiseworthy and downright glorious.

The Revolution Eats a Few More of its Own

In 1972 Lou Reed offended conservatives with his hit Walk on the Wild Side, an admiring ode to his transgendered friend Holly, who left Miami as a he and became a she on the way to New York. In 2017 the song has offended progressives as a transphobic example of cultural appropriation. In this article by C2C Staff, the Journal explains what a long, strange trip it’s been from conservative censorship to progressive censorship.

Share This Story


Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.