Stories

Book Review: The Baby Boom: How it Got That Way (and it wasn’t my fault) (and I’ll never do it again) by P.J. O’Rourke

Angela MacLeod Irons
March 16, 2014
Generational interloper Angela MacLeod Irons takes a look at P.J. O’Rourke’s new book on the baby boomers, finding that O’Rourke is as entertaining as ever, but betrays a certain amount of narcissism on behalf of his generation.
Stories

Book Review: The Baby Boom: How it Got That Way (and it wasn’t my fault) (and I’ll never do it again) by P.J. O’Rourke

Angela MacLeod Irons
March 16, 2014
Generational interloper Angela MacLeod Irons takes a look at P.J. O’Rourke’s new book on the baby boomers, finding that O’Rourke is as entertaining as ever, but betrays a certain amount of narcissism on behalf of his generation.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

 

The Baby Boom: How it Got That Way (and it wasn’t my fault) (and I’ll never do it again) by: P.J. O’Rourke

290pp.: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2014

Reviewed by: Angela MacLeod Irons

 

It feels rather ironic that I have been asked to review P.J. O’Rourke’s new book, The Baby Boom: How it Got That Way (and it wasn’t my fault) (and I’ll never do it again), as I am not a member of this epic generation.  Actually, I don’t really belong to any generation, being born during the lost years between Generation X and the Millennials.  I have never quite related to the Gen X’ers who came before me, who were originally defined as slackers and have since developed, as a group, a somewhat alarming obsession with microbreweries (I’ll just have a Keith’s, thanks). I also grew up largely without the technology that has thus far shaped the worldview of the Millennials – I didn’t have Internet access at home until I was 18, and I purchased my first cellphone at the ripe old age of 24.  However, on more than one occasion, I have thanked the powers that be that there were no cellphone cameras or Facebook pages when I was going through my own version of young and stupid.  I pray that any photographic evidence of that period is languishing in a box in someone’s basement, never again to see the light of day. 

Therefore, it was with a bit of skepticism that I sat down to read O’Rourke’s attempt at a memoir for an entire generation.  And not just any generation, but the Baby Boom.  The generation that put its mark on the world more than any other single generation that came before it.  

O’Rourke’s book attempts to weave the coming-of-age tale of not just a single individual, but of 75 million Americans, born up to 20 years apart.  In order to make sense of it all, O’Rourke divides Boomers up as they do in high school – Seniors, Juniors, Sophomores and Freshmen.  In some cases, the Seniors are actually the parents of the Freshmen – although perhaps that was not always planned out in advance.

Those who are already fans of O’Rourke’s writing are apt to enjoy the dry wit and tongue-in-cheek humour, but at times the story seems to meander along without much in the way of direction or goal.  From the title alone, I expected more introspection, perhaps more commentary on how the world has changed because of the spike in the birth rate that occurred after World War II.  What I got instead was a large number of anecdotes and cute little stories about riding your bike until the street lights come on or going to a Homecoming Dance.  If you are in the mood for pithy political commentary, this is not the book for you.

 

That being said, this may still be a pleasant read for Baby Boomers themselves, who would enjoy taking time to reflect on the “good old days.”  That is, as long as you are Caucasian and grew up in a middle-class suburb.  If you don’t fit that description, it is highly likely that you had a much different experience than Mr. O’Rourke did.  All of the stories are told by the ubiquitous “we,” although in the preface O’Rourke acknowledges that the tales are all characterizations, conglomerations or completely “full of crap.” 

The one major take away I got from this book was O’Rourke’s focus on how narcissistic and self-centered Baby Boomers were (and are) – the very state of solipsism that Millennials are more typically accused of these days.  Baby Boomers just didn’t have access to Twitter.  I guess the more things change, the more they really do stay the same. 

At the end of the day, this tome is not to be taken as a serious dissertation – it is shelved in Humour, after all – but I was still expecting something more.  It attempted to be both comedic and informative, and in my opinion fell somewhat short on both counts.  However, I still think it is a worthwhile read for those who have enjoyed O’Rourke’s other works, or for anyone who would like a light-hearted walk down memory lane.  It is entirely possible that I have just completely missed the point – I am not exactly the target demographic, after all. 

~

Angela MacLeod Irons is an Alberta-based public policy analyst and researcher.  She holds a Masters degree from the University of Calgary’s School of Public Policy.  Her work has been published by the Manning Foundation for Democratic Education, C2C Journal and the National Post.  In her spare time she manages a bookstore in Calgary. 

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

More from this author

The Righteous Mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion

Without the luxury of reverting to evidence, statistics, or reason, much of political debate reverts to questions who feels more virtuous. However in this review Angela Macleod-Irons discovers an author who has applied reason even to that ephemeral question. Jonathan Haidt’s Righteous Mind argues that the statists among us are not responsible for their views, they simply lack some intrinsic moral tools.

The Russians Reject Gay Marriage

Russia continues to criminalize homosexuality. In a recent national referendum, it voted overwhelmingly to define marriage exclusively as a union between a man and a woman. This news isn’t new to Angela MacLeod Irons, who writes of how a toxic brew of historical influences have combined to create a culture of homophobia that is unique to Russia.