Stories

Notes from the political wilderness

Paul Bunner
February 25, 2016
A thousand Canadian conservative politicians and activists are gathered in Ottawa this month for the annual Manning Centre Conference. With conservatives out of power almost everywhere, the theme of the Conference is “recharging the right”. The Spring 2016 edition of C2C Journal complements this theme by examining what conservatives got right – and wrong – during their time in power, and what they might do to find their way back from the political wilderness. The edition launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and a reflection on Stephen Harper’s legacy by George Koch and Martin Grün.
Stories

Notes from the political wilderness

Paul Bunner
February 25, 2016
A thousand Canadian conservative politicians and activists are gathered in Ottawa this month for the annual Manning Centre Conference. With conservatives out of power almost everywhere, the theme of the Conference is “recharging the right”. The Spring 2016 edition of C2C Journal complements this theme by examining what conservatives got right – and wrong – during their time in power, and what they might do to find their way back from the political wilderness. The edition launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and a reflection on Stephen Harper’s legacy by George Koch and Martin Grün.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Here’s a story that illustrates how far the fortunes of Canadian conservatives have fallen. In late January, interim Conservative Party of Canada Leader Rona Ambrose was guest speaker at an Edmonton breakfast gathering of local conservatives. The event was held at a major hotel near downtown, and management had promised the organizers, who were expecting a big crowd, the main ballroom. As it turned out, however, the hotel was also hosting the Fourth Annual Treaty 6 Educators Conference, and it needed the ballroom for its keynote speaker that morning, University of Winnipeg academic and CBC darling Wab Kinew. The Leader of Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition got bumped to a nondescript hall at the back of the hotel that barely accommodated the 150 faithful who turned out for her. The microphone failed once and the scrambled eggs were watery.

To be fair, Kinew was performing for an even bigger crowd, and the hotel probably gets less business from conservatives than it does from modern-day aboriginal nomads who migrate from conference to conference just as their ancestors pursued the buffalo. Whatever the Ambrose audience paid for their congealed eggs, it’s a safe bet the hotel got more from the Treaty Six Educators, courtesy of federal taxpayers. This is just the ways things are in 2016, when conservatives just about everywhere in Canada have been exiled to the political wilderness and every progressive politician currently in power opens public meetings by tugging their forelocks and acknowledging “we’re on First Nations land”.

Canadian conservatives are understandably frustrated by this turn of events and angry that some the good work their governments in Ottawa and elsewhere did over the last decade or so is being undone by the new leftist regimes that rule the land. But even the most partisan among them must admit, if they’re true democrats, that the voters are always right, even when they go crazy and elect socialists in Alberta and a drama teacher as prime minister.

Besides, opposition can be cathartic. Power tends not only to corrupt, but also to breed complacency, attract opportunists, and concentrate in the hands of a few who grow ever more certain that their way is the only way. Periodic exile to the political wilderness is good for politicians and parties. It forces them to reflect on their errors, change their leaders, and develop new policy ideas. The parasites who attach themselves to power fall off, leaving the idealists free to renew and rebuild their movement. Best of all, they stop fighting with each other and focus on their common enemies.

So it is with the conservative movement in Canada today. Liberated from the burdens of power but still within sight of it, it seems surprisingly cheerful about its circumstances and optimistic about its future. As Nigel Hannaford writes in a four-year preview of the electoral calendar for this edition of C2C Journal, Conservative parties are expected to hold and gain power in Saskatchewan and Manitoba this year. The centre-right Liberal government in British Columbia, presiding over one of the country’s few growing economies, should ride it to re-election next year. Surely Ontario’s tottering Liberal dynasty will finally give way to a rejuvenated Progressive Conservative party in 2018, and it’s hard to imagine the fiscally prudent Couillard government in Quebec succumbing to the leftist Parti Quebecois that year as long as the sovereignty movement remains in limbo.

This all looks like conservative momentum heading into 2019, when the right will try to retake power in Ottawa and Alberta, its strongest bastions until last year’s missteps and upsets. At the federal level, the immediate focus will be on replacing Stephen Harper as leader. In these pages, Mathieu Dumont looks at a dozen potential contenders and ponders the characteristics the party will be looking for in a new messiah. In Alberta the divided right is trying to get its act together, likely in the form of a new conservative party, just as the federal Tories did over a decade ago.

This edition of C2C is roughly split between stories examining Harper’s legacy and ruminations on the future of Canadian conservatism. The former includes a comprehensive overview by George Koch and Martin Grün, a look at Harper’s impact on the criminal justice system by Rory Leishman, a retrospective on his foreign policy by Candice Malcolm, and D’Arcy Jenish’s assessment of Harper’s efforts to maintain harmony in our oft-fractious federation.

Rounding out our future-focused pieces are Mark Cameron’s thoughts on conservatives, conservation and climate change, Jeff Hodgson’s provocative prescription for a very new conservative approach to deficits and debt, and Mark Milke’s robust critique of Canadian “post-nationalism” as articulated, if you can call it that, by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

We received several more stories and essays in response to our call for submissions on this theme. It is a measure of how much soul-searching and rethinking is going on within the movement. Although we couldn’t fit them all in this edition of C2C, watch for them to be published on our website, c2cjournal.ca, in the weeks ahead.

~

Paul Bunner is editor of C2CJournal

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Hands-On Future: Skilled Trades, Data Centres and Canada’s Big AI Opportunity

Whether Canadians fear or favour artificial intelligence, they can’t stop it. AI’s transformative power in making so many things faster and easier will doubtless cause pain, says veteran Canadian business leader Gwyn Morgan, but it will also provide generational opportunities Canada must seize. The Prairie region, especially, has the abundant land and energy needed to build the massive AI data centres that will power the future. Some workers are at risk, Morgan concedes, but AI will create opportunities as well, particularly in the skilled trades. AI might just transform our labour force into one where more workers do real things for real people.

The Day After: How Ottawa’s Clarity Act Could Destroy the Federation It Was Meant to Protect

With Alberta headed for a vote on having a vote on independence, many Canadians may think the threat of separation has evaporated. Or that it’s a long way off. Or that, in any case, Ottawa’s Clarity Act will shut it down and protect the federation. But in the concluding instalment of their series (read Part I here and Part II here), George Koch and Jim Mason explode that delusion. The Act is more likely to increase the “Yes” vote which, they predict, will trigger more political wrangling, more bad faith and bitterness, possible civil unrest and even the province’s annexation by the U.S. The consequences, in other words, are dire no matter which side you’re on.

Too Clever by Half: Why Ottawa’s Clarity Act Helps Neither Side in Alberta’s Separation Debate

The House of Commons once had an effective law in front of it that laid out clear steps to assure that any provincial referendum on independence would be democratic and any negotiations after a “Yes” vote would be fair. But it wasn’t the current Clarity Act – it was a bill put forward by the Opposition Reform Party in 1996, and the Liberal government chose to ignore it. Instead, it passed its own legislation designed to crush support for any subsequent secession movement. In Part II of their series on what the Clarity Act means to today’s debate over Alberta’s future, George Koch and Jim Mason delve into the Act’s origin story and explain why it’s so blatantly stacked in favour of Ottawa – and how that could inflame separatist sentiment and undermine the federalist cause.

More from this author

Good News From C2C Journal

C2C Journal is pleased to announce that thanks to the loyal and generous support of our readers, contributors and donors, the Journal is immediately increasing volume and frequency of original stories and essays, expanding staff, unveiling a redesigned website, and launching a sustained social media marketing push on multi-media platforms. Editor Paul Bunner has the details.

One step forward, two steps back for freedom

When he wasn’t kayaking on or swimming in the North Saskatchewan River near his home in Edmonton, C2C Journal editor Paul Bunner spent some of his summer fighting two battles for little freedoms in his local community. He won one and lost one. Although he’s a veteran political activist at the federal and provincial level, Bunner contends that the lifeblood of democracy must be nurtured at the foundations of society if it is to flourish at the top.

The Last Front Page

The rapidly shrinking newspaper business raises all kinds of questions. What will we wrap fish guts in? How will we light backyard fires? And where will we get reasonably accurate and important stories about what’s going on in our community, our country, and the world? The internet? Where global editor-bots decide what’s news? Where politicians can lie with impunity? Where fake news outsells real news? The short answer is yes. The longer and more encouraging answer is in the Spring edition of C2C Journal, which launches today with editor Paul Bunner’s lead editorial and career newspaperman Paul Stanway’s lament for the ink-stained wretches of yesterday’s news.