Airport Privatization

It’s Time to Privatize Canadian Airports

Peter Shawn Taylor
August 19, 2021
Airports are not just crucial pieces of transportation infrastructure, they’re also economic engines for the cities and regions they serve. But airports require vast amounts of capital to build, run and modernize. With governments at all levels mired in debt, who will supply that capital? Across most of the world, it’s private-sector investors – something expressly forbidden in Canada. Drawing on expert opinion and insight, Peter Shawn Taylor makes the case for allowing this country’s airports to join the modern world by accessing equity markets. But first they’ll have to free themselves from Canada’s antiquated and burdensome airport policy.
Airport Privatization

It’s Time to Privatize Canadian Airports

Peter Shawn Taylor
August 19, 2021
Airports are not just crucial pieces of transportation infrastructure, they’re also economic engines for the cities and regions they serve. But airports require vast amounts of capital to build, run and modernize. With governments at all levels mired in debt, who will supply that capital? Across most of the world, it’s private-sector investors – something expressly forbidden in Canada. Drawing on expert opinion and insight, Peter Shawn Taylor makes the case for allowing this country’s airports to join the modern world by accessing equity markets. But first they’ll have to free themselves from Canada’s antiquated and burdensome airport policy.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

There aren’t many things that can’t be bought for $21 billion. Australia’s Sydney Airport is one of those things. This week the board of directors of the privately-operated, stock exchange-listed airport turned down a AUS$22.8 billion buyout offer from a consortium of international investors; it was the group’s second rejected bid.    

Very few economic sectors were harder-hit than airports by the global Covid-19 shutdown that has extended well into this summer. At the peak of the pandemic’s first wave, commercial air traffic was down by as much as 90 percent and most airports around the world were forced to drastically curtail operations and implement huge layoffs; some shut down altogether. (Recall that Canada closed all but four of the country’s airports to international traffic in 2020.) Given Australia’s numerous snap lockdowns and a continuing ban on international air travel until 2022, that country’s airports have been no strangers to this pain.  

A hot commodity: Australia’s Sydney Airport is attracting huge interest from global infrastructure investors despite 2020 being the worst year in the history of air travel.

Yet the owners of Sydney Airport sniffed at last week’s eye-popping $21 billion offer, even though it represented a nearly 50 percent premium over the company’s pre-bid market capitalization and was at the very high end of conventional airport valuations. “Sydney Airport is strongly positioned to deliver growth as vaccination rates increase and we move into the post-pandemic recovery period,” the board said in response to the consortium’s first bid in July. Higher offers from other groups are expected shortly as a bidding war takes shape.  

The surprising interest in Sydney’s airport suggests savvy institutional investors have already factored in the impact of the pandemic on the industry and are looking far into the future. And not just in Australia. While global deal-making may be down for obvious reasons, airports continue to be highly coveted assets. Last year Aéroports de Paris, the world’s largest airport company, bought 49 percent of India’s GMR Airports. During the pandemic, new privately-owned or operated airports were also opened or announced in Chile, Bulgaria, India and Guinea. And this past April Brazil sold 22 small regional airports in a heated auction that earned substantially more than the government had been expecting.

“These developments suggest investor interest in airports has survived 2020’s huge downturn in air travel and infrastructure investors are taking a long-term view of airports as revenue-generators,” says Robert Poole, director of transportation policy at the Washington, D.C.-based Reason Foundation and author of an annual report on the worldwide state of airport privatization. He calls the action over the Sydney airport a “dramatic sign” of renewed attention being paid to airports’ investment possibilities. “Here was an offer right at the top-end of previous valuations,” Poole marvels in an interview. “And it was rejected!”

“A dramatic sign”: The bidding war over Sydney’s airport suggests the time is right to begin privatizating airports in Canada and the U.S., says Robert Poole, director of transportation policy at the Washington-based Reason Foundation and author of an annual report on airport privatization.

But if Sydney’s airport is worth much more than $21 billion following the worst year in the history of air travel, what might Canada’s airports be worth? And why is no one talking about buying or selling them?

The North American Oddity

Canada’s airports suffered through an existential crisis every bit as bad as Australia or elsewhere. Perhaps worse, considering that bankruptcy was openly discussed for some hard-hit airports and with revenue losses across the sector estimated at $5.5 billion. Only after a hefty federal government bailout, more debt and the recent rebound in domestic air travel has the immediate sense of panic abated. Yet the long-term sustainability of Canada’s airport sector remains an open question due to several significant and enduring problems.

Perhaps the most important development in global air travel over the past several decades has been the growing role of the private sector in airports – either as owners or long-term lease holders. According to Airports Council International, 75 percent of all air travellers in Europe during the pre-Covid era flew through privately-run airports. In South America, the figure is 66 percent. In Asia, it’s nearly half. Yet North America remains a curious exception to this trend. A mere 1 percent of air travellers in Canada or the U.S. transited via a private sector airport.

“North America is certainly out of step with the rest of the world as we have seen a global move towards airport privatization over the past 25 years,” says Poole. The reason for this government-owned oddity varies across the border. In the U.S., most airports are controlled by city or county governments and financed via tax-exempt municipal bonds. Turning over operations to the private sector would require replacing that low-interest debt with more expensive financing. Also, airlines in the U.S. have a veto over changes to airport ownership.

In Canada, the obstacle to privatization is political rather than contractual, and goes back at least three decades. During the 1993 election campaign, Prime Minister Kim Campbell’s Progressive Conservative government announced it was handing control of Terminals 1 and 2 of Toronto’s Pearson International Airport to a private consortium. It would have been a landmark privatization deal for Canada. Sensing a campaign opportunity, however, Liberal leader Jean Chrétien declared Campbell’s move “indecent” and vowed to tear up the contract. Campbell’s party was all-but annihilated on election day.

After the election – and stung by complaints he’d reneged on other campaign promises to scrap NAFTA and the GST – Chrétien dug in his heels on Pearson. As other airports around the world embraced full or partial privatization, the Chrétien Liberals declared the entire sector off-limits forever. The country’s most significant airports were instead given to local, non-profit airport authorities on 60-year leases in exchange for hefty annual lease payments. This turned airports – once a major expense for the federal government – into a cash cow. Canadian airports have since remitted $6.5 billion in lease payments to Ottawa.

A consequential clash: During the 1993 federal election, Progressive Conservative Prime Minister Kim Campbell (left) announced the privatization of Terminals 1 and 2 of Toronto’s Pearson International Airport; federal Liberal leader Jean Chrétien (right) killed the plan after he won the election and then made future privatization deals impossible. (Source of left photo: Library and Archives Canada, e011065950)

The High Cost of Public Ownership

Canada’s airport ownership model is unique in the world. And Canadians suffer for it. Burdened by their lease obligations and managed by independent bureaucracies with little interest in keeping expenses down or satisfying their customers, Canadian airport authorities are notorious for the high fees they charge airlines and travellers alike, and for approving expensive and overbuilt “gold-plated” terminals which push those dreaded fees even higher. Because they’re forbidden to raise equity, Canada’s airport must rely solely on bond financing for all those gilded expansions and renovations.

The pandemic laid bare the inherent flaws in this form of public ownership. Without investors to lean on and with no revenue to speak of, local airport authorities in Canada were forced to beg government to bail them out – and then to take on even more debt. The Canadian Airport Council reports that during 2020 and 2021 its members have added $2.8 billion to the approximately $15 billion in debt they already owe. Since the airports are still technically owned by Ottawa, Canadian taxpayers are ultimately on the hook for all that debt.

“Private ownership is certainly a more robust model,” advises Poole, since it offers greater financial management flexibility. Privately-owned airports around the world responded to the Covid-19 disaster either by reducing dividends or issuing more equity, meaning taxpayers did not have to bail them out. In 2020, for example, the Sydney Airport raised nearly $2 billion through a new share offering.

Airport privatization offers other benefits extending far beyond crisis protection. David Scott is the president of SCOTT Associates Architects, a Toronto-based airport-focused architecture firm that has designed new, privately-operated airports across Europe, South America and the Caribbean. Scott’s firm recently teamed up with Canadian construction giant Aecon Group Inc. to build Bermuda’s new $400 million LF Wade International Airport, which opened last December. In essence, the new facility was provided free to the country as Aecon financed and built the airport and will operate it privately for the next 30 years. “Bermuda didn’t have to put in any money, and at the end of the lease the airport will be handed back to the government,” boasts Scott. It’s a sweet deal for taxpayers.

Who wants a free airport? David Scott, president of SCOTT Associates Architects, designed Bermuda’s new LF Wade International Airport (right) as part of a privately-financed deal that delivered the $400 million airport to the island at no cost to taxpayers.

Besides keeping government costs down, privately-built and operated airports tend to focus on functionality and throughput rather than gold-plated ostentation, Scott says in an interview: “No one is trying to build ego-monuments here.” These more modest ambitions also translate into lower fees for travellers. “Prices are more likely to rise under government control,” he observes. “From a privatized perspective, the more people you can put through your terminal, the more money you will make. You want to generate as much traffic as possible and you do that by keeping your customers happy.” Research by the C.D. Howe Institute backs Scott’s claim that fees tend to be lower at privately-run airports.  

The Privatization Conversation

There have been several recent attempts at hoisting Canada’s airports into the 21st century by allowing private-sector participation. All have been unsuccessful. In 2016, former federal Transportation Minister David Emerson delivered a comprehensive report on the state of Canada’s airports to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government. Originally commissioned by the previous Conservative administration of Stephen Harper, Emerson’s report laid out five privatization options to replace what he called the “antiquated Canadian model.” These ranged from the outright sale of entire airports to long-term lease agreements similar to Scott’s Bermuda deal.

Trudeau promptly ignored it all; he did the same thing with another airport privatization study from consultant Credit Suisse commissioned by former Liberal Finance Minister Bill Morneau ahead of the 2017 federal budget. The Liberal policy on airport ownership appears unchanged since the Chrétien days.

Ironically enough, Scott’s Bermuda deal was arranged by Canadian Commercial Company, a federal Crown corporation that brokers large government-to-government deals for Canadian firms. The Bermuda airport thus highlights a peculiar feature of Canada’s airport policy. Ottawa is keen to support and promote airport privatization around the world when it benefits Canadian firms, but has no time for the concept here at home where it would benefit Canadian air travellers, the country’s airlines and the thousands of smaller companies that depend on airports or help keep them running.

At times, Canadian airports have staked out their own positions on privatization, with local airport authorities in Toronto and Montreal quietly supporting private-sector involvement, and their counterparts in Vancouver, Calgary and Ottawa opposing the notion. Yet there hasn’t been any fulsome public debate on this issue since 2019. With many other issues now competing for airtime in the 2021 federal election – and with the Conservative platform mute on privatization – airport policy seems unlikely to play a key role this time around, as it did in 1993. Then again, debt crises have a way of forcing their way onto the agenda at the most inopportune times.

Putting a Price Tag on Airports

Financial analyst Ian Madsen has spent the last two years valuing Canada’s major airports as part of a research project on the sale of Crown assets for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. In 2019 he calculated that Pearson International Airport could be worth up to $15 billion, making it Canada’s most valuable airport. It’s a significant, if not eye-popping, number. “Of course the Sydney airport is in a much better position,” says Madsen, noting Sydney doesn’t face the same huge debt load or lease payment obligations that burden Canadian airports. “But it shows you what could happen with airports in major Canadian cities if they were on a better commercial footing.”

Keep your customers happy: Besides saving taxpayers money, privatized airports tend to avoid ostentatious “gold-plated” terminals and focus instead on keeping fees down and traffic up. (Source: Shutterstock)

Madsen valuates Vancouver’s International Airport at between $8 billion and $10 billion; heavily-indebted Calgary International could bring $2 billion. Taking Canada’s airports to market thus offers the opportunity for realizing a substantial source of cash as the federal deficit spirals out of control. If airports could find a way to pay down their debts and eliminate those troublesome federal lease payments, those values could rise significantly, says Madsen in an interview. He suggests any initial private-sector investment should be applied to repaying debt in order to improve the airports’ overall financial situation in the future.

With the ongoing frenzy in Sydney revealing a healthy appetite among large global institutional investors for airport deals, Madsen figures now is a good time to begin the process in Canada. In fact, there may not be much choice. “The Canadian model is not sustainable,” the financial analyst concludes. Scott agrees. “The pandemic has placed huge pressure on the local airport authorities” says the airport designer. “Instead of paying down their debt, they’ve been piling it on – creating huge liabilities.”

“The Canadian model is not sustainable”: Ian Madsen, a senior policy analyst at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, has calculated the market value of all major Canadian airports over the past two years and recommends a gradual privatization process to unlock value for taxpayers.

Scott figures this mounting pressure could soon rupture the status quo and force the government’s hand. Early evidence of looming distress may be seen in a recent request for interest from investors by Toronto’s small, city-owned Billy Bishop Airport, located on an island near the downtown core. “Here we have a situation where there’s no revenue coming in, and they need someone to come in and take it over,” says Scott. The airport has been closed since March 2020 and plans to reopen next month.  

If the underlying problems nagging Canada’s airports – high debt, exorbitant lease payments and political aversion – can be overcome, there’s great value waiting to be unlocked, says the Reason Foundation’s Poole, who will soon release his own valuation report on the prospects for privatizing 35 U.S. airports. “If investors are willing to put their money in airports in Peru, Chile, Colombia, India and elsewhere, they would clearly welcome an opportunity to invest in similar long-term assets in a highly-developed country such as Canada,” says Poole. “Canada and the U.S. are really the last two untapped markets [for airport privatization] in the world.”

Given the demonstrated investor excitement for Sydney’s airport, and with Canadian taxpayers coming to the end of their ability to fund massive federal subsidies and bailouts, now is the time to start talking about bringing Canada’s airports into the modern age.  

Peter Shawn Taylor is senior features editor at C2C Journal. He lives in Waterloo, Ontario.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Can We Really Inject Our Way Out of This Pandemic?
Part Two of a Special Series

In Part One of this special series, Lynne Cohen chronicled the story of how early vaccines were created and the amazing individuals who brought them into being. Vaccines are one of humanity’s signal achievements, saving hundreds of millions of lives. Yet is that reason enough to abandon all skepticism regarding Covid-19 inoculations? Are they just like the smallpox vaccine of 225 years ago or the polio vaccine from the 1950s – or do they work differently? And if so, in what ways? Grant A. Brown takes a careful, evidence-based look at these important questions, beginning with an overview of viruses and how standard vaccines behave, and then comparing that with the key characteristics, behaviour and performance of the latest Covid-19 vaccines.

Searching for Balanced Policies in the Federal Election

As the federal election campaign degenerates from vicious name-calling to literal sticks and stones, the idea of governing the country by balancing competing visions, policies, regions and demands seems quaint, if not antique. But perhaps this absence of equilibrium only serves to highlight its value. Preston Manning makes the case for bringing greater balance to a wide range of topics, including economic policies, Covid-19 restrictions, the environment, federal-provincial relations and even identity politics. What’s required to get there are political leaders committed to hearing both sides of the issues – and an electorate that demands it.

The Diversity Movement: The Good, the Bad and the Dangerous

His commitment to universal rights began in high school, his admiration for Martin Luther King Jr. runs deep, he spent years representing underprivileged defendants in the legal system, and he wrote a book on behalf of Indigenous people and their environment. Robert Girvan believes passionately in the equality of every person and has a visceral horror of prejudging anyone based on their race, colour or other immutable characteristics. He respects Canada’s system of laws and considers even-handed justice among humanity’s noblest ideals. The former defence lawyer and Crown prosecutor believes all of that is under attack – by what he used to consider his own side. Girvan bares his heart and soul in dissecting the grave threats to liberal ideas and Canada’s very institutions posed by the increasingly extreme diversity and identity politics movements.

More from this author

Childcare on the Ballot

Political theory suggests that freedom and equity are opposing concepts. Allowing greater individual autonomy is assumed to curtail fairness for the less advantaged, and vice versa. Not so when it comes to the 2021 electoral debate over childcare – one of the few areas of sharp contrast between the two main parties. Peter Shawn Taylor takes a close look at the Liberals’ proposed national childcare system and the Conservatives’ refundable childcare tax credit and finds one option delivers not only greater choice for all parents, but superior support for low-income families as well as the promise of new spaces.

Why the Private Sector is Essential to Ottawa’s National Childcare Plan

The Trudeau government’s $30 billion plan to transform childcare nationwide is focused on more than just families. It also wanders into an ideological battlefield by declaring the non-profit sector preferable to private operators. Ottawa is thus ignoring the vital role played by childcare owners in expanding supply and meeting the diverse needs of working parents. In a deep dive into Canada’s complex childcare system, Peter Shawn Taylor talks to several remarkable female entrepreneurs and other key figures to reveal the reality and necessity of for-profit childcare. 

Vindication for Ontario’s For-Profit Nursing Homes

Nearly all our food comes from privately-owned farms and businesses. The same goes for our clothes, homes and vehicles – all manufactured and sold with the expectation of a profit. So why the animosity shown entrepreneurs who choose to operate nursing homes and other care facilities? Peter Shawn Taylor reviews two recent Ontario government investigations into the performance of the province’s nursing home sector during Covid-19 and finds a surprising vote of confidence for the contribution made by the private sector in caring for the province’s seniors.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print


Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.