Black and Right and read all over

Patrick Keeney
March 21, 2017
Most mainstream conservative commentators in Canada and the United States were hostile toward Donald Trump when he was running for the presidency, and still are. Almost alone among the right-wing commentariat, Conrad Black backed him early, and often, and still does. But contrarian is the way it’s always been with Black, writes Patrick Keeney in a review of a new collection of Black columns; he never fails to challenge, inform, entertain – and surprise.

Black and Right and read all over

Patrick Keeney
March 21, 2017
Most mainstream conservative commentators in Canada and the United States were hostile toward Donald Trump when he was running for the presidency, and still are. Almost alone among the right-wing commentariat, Conrad Black backed him early, and often, and still does. But contrarian is the way it’s always been with Black, writes Patrick Keeney in a review of a new collection of Black columns; he never fails to challenge, inform, entertain – and surprise.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

Backward Glances: People and Events from Inside and Out

By Conrad Black

741 pp: Signal, 2016

Reviewed by Patrick Keeney

 

This seven-hundred page collection of previously published pieces by the prodigious writer Conrad Black is pretty much what one expects: polemical, argumentative, disputatious, contrarian, acerbic, and opinionated.

It is also wonderfully well written and never less than entertaining. Lord Bolingbroke wrote that “History is philosophy teaching with examples.” By that metric, Lord Black is a wonderful tutor. One is impressed by the erudition and sheer catholicity of learning on display.

The essays range over 50 years and numerous publications including the National Post, National ReviewForeign AffairsThe New Criterion, and The American Spectator. Black’s writing spans a vast landscape of subjects including Canadian, American and International politics, celebrities, the environment, justice, punishment and retribution, historiography, religion (Black, who says his family was “divided between atheism and agnosticism”, is a convert to Catholicism) and, of course, the struggles of newspaper publishing in the age of the internet. There are book reviews, and in the last section, the author writes candidly about personal matters, including a touching encomium to his late brother, Monte.

The book suffers from the usual complaints about any such collection. Predictably, some subjects have slipped from public view or are now well past their sell-by date. And history moves on, calling into question the judgement of even the most prescient of commentators.

Nothing new in news fakery

Yet these are modest cavils. What most impresses is the overall readability of these essays. Even if their subject matter is no longer front-page news, they continue to resonate with contemporary issues and concerns. For example, in our age of “fake news”, Black’s 2015 analysis of the fall from grace of NBC anchor Brian Williams is apposite. Williams was fired by the network for falsely claiming he came under fire as a war correspondent in Iraq. Black found it “implausible, and even bizarre, for the higher-ups at NBC News to become so unctuous about Williams when the whole industry is infested with myth-makers and tendentious partisans who, in their daily reporting, can often be assumed to be taking liberties with the truth whenever you see their lips move.” The problem in part is that “there lingers in public memory a benign nostalgia that previous newsreaders and anchors were people of immense integrity and insight.” Alas, as Black points out at various places throughout this collection, this was never the case. Even the sainted Walter Cronkite, “just made it up.”

Black is a marvellous prose stylist of the kind that used to be called “muscular.” His opinions are rendered with a cogency and pithiness that makes for a lively discourse between author and reader. I frequently found myself setting the book down, either to reflect on something I’d read, to argue a point, or simply to appreciate the verve and wit of the prose. In an essay on cats and dogs he writes, “Even tomcats, unkempt and with tangles in their fur, have a certain inseparable dignity, like a feline John Malkovich.” As an admirer of both cats and Malkovich, this strikes me as precisely right.

The book abounds with such analogies, along with bon mots, word play, clever turns of phrase, and concise summations of complex ideas.  And if the proper role for historians is to challenge national myths, then Black excels at forcing Canadians to re-examine some cherished national shibboleths, such as that tedious progressive talking point that defines our foreign policy as “soft power”:

“It is a concept that has any validity only when there is a hard-power option, which Canada did not possess. As practiced by this country, soft power was a fraud, just more softness.” 

keeney-inset

Or again, here is Black’s summation of what he terms the “defective moralizing” concerning the residential schools program:

“Assimilation was an extension of the Canadian and American practice of integrating newly arrived people in the majority cultures. However mistakingly and patronizingly conceived and at times barbarously executed, the authors of the residential schools program, starting with John A. MacDonald, imagined they would be benignly solving the problems of the native people.” 

One might disagree with his views, but there is never any doubt as to what his views are.

Evisceration and compassion

When writing of literary celebrities, Black can dip his pen in acid. On Gore Vidal: “He was the apogee and caricature of a number of notorious types, fused in one ambulatory, humanoid sociopath. … He set out with an indomitable will to be obnoxious, and at this he was an overachiever.” As a Catholic, Black found Christopher Hitchens’ arguments for atheism “so unmitigatedly fatuous, he always seemed to me rather silly, more a pest than even a gadfly, much less a sage or wit.”

Such florid expressions of disdain are often derided by the left as evidence of Black’s pomposity and arrogance. Yet there is another quality in his prose, one which came as something of a surprise. In 2007, he was convicted in a Chicago court of embezzling funds from his holding company, Hollinger International, and sentenced to six-and-a-half years in federal prison. Ultimately, after a series of appeals, only a single conviction for obstruction of justice was upheld, along with civil penalties from the Securities and Exchange Commission. He spent 37 months in a U.S. federal prison in Florida, all the while (and to this day) tenaciously maintaining his innocence before what he calls “the rogue American proscecutocracy.”

Yet when he writes abut his time in prison Black’s tone is confessional, humble and authentic. Given his fall from the heights of the corporate world, and his insistence on his innocence, Black might be forgiven for an occasional lapse of self-pity. Instead, he meets his fate with equanimity, and displays great empathy and compassion for his fellow inmates, the social and economic disadvantages that plagued their lives, and the suffering they endured at the hands of the American judicial system. Black is particularly scathing about the abuses inherent in the plea-bargain system. He claims that American prosecutors win over 97 percent of their cases without trial.

Reading about his work in prison as a tutor to his fellow inmates, one is moved by Black’s basic human decency, and his genuine affection for his students. He writes, “It has been my good fortune to be well-received in some learned and distinguished places, and I am always grateful for considered applause, but never more so than when complimented by my students on receipt of my advanced tutor’s certificate…”

In his introduction, Mark Steyn tells of a conversation with Mrs. Black, Barbara Amiel, who speaks of the oddity of marrying a corporate titan who became a freelance writer. Yet fortunes shift for all of us, even for corporate titans, and it is a tribute to Conrad Black that he has emerged from his sojourn a wiser, and more compassionate man. As the author writes, “It pains me to verge on platitudes, but life’s rewards do sometimes come in strange ways and unexpected places.”

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

Thirteen Things That Can’t Be Said About Aboriginal Law And Policy In Canada

How do you make new laws and policies or reform old ones in a democracy? You talk openly about every aspect, carefully consider the pros and cons and the long-term implications, and strive to come up with solutions that are fair to everyone. That has been the ideal, anyway, in Canada since Confederation. So what happens when vast areas of law and policy cannot even be discussed any longer? Bruce Pardy lists the things that have become perilous to say regarding Indigenous issues – but that need to be said if Canada is to maintain a legal system that is fair to all Canadians.

Democratic socialism is the new communism, but what does that mean for the people old enough to remember living under communism?

New Communism, Old Fears

Supporting or working to bring about “democratic” socialism has become an alluring option for ever-more voters across North America. It is ascending on clouds of virtuous intentions, high hopes and utopian goals, backed by elaborate theories, with good doses of anger and envy adding punch. Yet it has all been tried before – and failed calamitously, an unmitigated horror ending in ruination. Luckily, people who have personally lived through it are still around to tell the tale. Through the eyes of one survivor of Eastern European communism, Doug Firby issues a stark reminder of what real oppression looks like and a plea to younger Canadians to resist the seductive call of socialism.

What would have happened if Canada rejected "coronapsychosis"?

Rejecting “Coronapsychosis” Could Be Good for Our Health

It will remain forever unknowable how Canada would have fared had our country not largely aped the “lockdown” model adopted by most of the advanced countries. But there is meaningful evidence for those who care and dare to look – and the implications aren’t pretty for our public health officials and their political acolytes. Brian Giesbrecht examined an obscure, far-off country run by an eccentric old man who decided to do the pandemic his own way – and may well have saved not only his nation’s economy but hundreds of his compatriots as well.

More from this author

A mustang driving down the open road is the epitome of the freedom felt when driving.

Why the Freedom of Driving Still Matters

Most of us have heard it said that a lot of science and engineering went into bringing you the automobile gleaming beneath your gaze in the showroom. A lot goes into the act of driving as well. And while many people no doubt find driving banal or worse, Patrick Keeney believes there’s also a lot at stake. To drive, he writes, is to exercise our skill at being free, to display our competence, to accelerate for the sheer joy of it, and to negate the technocrats who strive to make our lives idiot-proof and safe. To steer our very lives, as it were. To Keeney and the author of the book he reviews in this essay, few places are better than behind the wheel, breathing the heady air of freedom.

Can Liberalism Survive the Coronavirus Era?

Covid-19 poses a grave threat to many things: nursing homes, music festivals and café culture among them. But what of its broader implications? The coronavirus cares nothing for identity, imaginative individual rights or past grievances. It is severely undermining globalist fantasies. And recovering from its ravages seems likely to reward countries that focus on conservative values of pragmatism, frugality, duty, markets and tradition. Patrick Keeney charts the likely fortunes of conservative and liberal convictions once the pandemic recedes.

Thailand Diary: Living Joyfully in a Time of Disease

Canadians have been hectored into essentially hunkering down in their homes. Nearly all of us at least have a home. But what if you found yourself halfway around the world, with nowhere to live, the situation changing almost hourly, and lacking even the legal rights of a local citizen? Patrick Keeney not only maintained his equanimity but found time on the fly to explain how one man adapted to the life of an expatriate vagabond. Keeney shares his observations about the pandemic’s impact on a vulnerable culture and shows us all how, amidst the many exigencies, it’s possible to continuing finding joy.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.