The Biggest Question Mark in Trudeau’s Latest Ethics Scandal

Gwyn Morgan
July 24, 2020
We are now onto Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s third official ethics imbroglio. Mr. “blind spot”, as a previous ethics commissioner termed him, is back at it, once more trailing cabinet ministers and political flunkies. The blind leading the blind, as it were. This time around it’s a close to billion-dollar sweetheart deal offered to WE Charity – an organization with close ties to Trudeau and cabinet ministers. As the Opposition and media focus on the mechanics and legalities of the growing scandal, Gwyn Morgan probes the deeper question of why anyone would think shovelling vast sums into yet another summer jobs program for students was a good idea. The possible answer is downright diabolical.

The Biggest Question Mark in Trudeau’s Latest Ethics Scandal

Gwyn Morgan
July 24, 2020
We are now onto Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s third official ethics imbroglio. Mr. “blind spot”, as a previous ethics commissioner termed him, is back at it, once more trailing cabinet ministers and political flunkies. The blind leading the blind, as it were. This time around it’s a close to billion-dollar sweetheart deal offered to WE Charity – an organization with close ties to Trudeau and cabinet ministers. As the Opposition and media focus on the mechanics and legalities of the growing scandal, Gwyn Morgan probes the deeper question of why anyone would think shovelling vast sums into yet another summer jobs program for students was a good idea. The possible answer is downright diabolical.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

Conflict of interest revelations surrounding the selection of WE Charity to administer the Canada Student Service  Grant have dominated recent media coverage and prompted investigations by parliamentary committees and the federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner. While getting answers on how WE Charity was selected are essential, there’s been scant focus on the most fundamental question: Why was this $913 million program conceived in the first place?

The Prime Minister stated it was needed so students would have summer jobs. But in many cases, despite a youth unemployment rate that topped 27 percent in April, students are declining to take jobs that already exist. A prime example is agriculture. Covid-19 has caused farmers to face delays in getting temporary foreign workers, leaving crops spoiling in their fields. Students whom beleaguered farmers did manage to attract either failed to show up or quit after deciding the work was too hard, a phenomenon that reflects our coddled Generation Z’s widespread aversion to physical labour.

Justin Trudeau and his family's history of speaking at WE events has become a centre point of the ethics scandal.
Picture of WE event at school. The government claims this school outreach made it a prime candidate for administering the program at the centre of Trudeau's third ethics scandal..
Third time’s a charm: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is once again being investigated by the federal ethics commissioner, this time for his role in awarding a major contract to WE Charity, an organization with close ties to his own family.

Examination of the support already available to post-secondary students makes it even clearer why students opted out of available jobs. Here’s a condensed list of programs, all of which have been increased in size due to Covid-19:

  • The Canada Student Grant, a non-repayable program for lower-income students, has been doubled from $3,000 to $6,000 per student;
  • The Canada Student Loans weekly maximum limit has been raised from $210 to $350 and the requirement for students to contribute any portion of their educational costs has been waived;
  • The Canada Emergency Student Benefit provides up to $1,250 every four weeks from May through August for students who claim they’ve looked for work but haven’t landed a job;
  • Colleges and universities alike are increasing the normal size of bursaries for students in financial need. Additionally, individual scholarships are available for high-performing students; and
  • The well-known Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was recently extended by eight weeks to a maximum of 24 weeks and pays $2,000 every four weeks to students who have earned at least $5,000 over the past 12 months.

Clearly, the need to create summer jobs isn’t a credible answer to the why question concerning the Canada Student Service Grant. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s other attempt at justifying it is the need to provide charities with “paid volunteers” (a term that perfectly meets the definition of an oxymoron) to help them deliver their programs.

The Canada Student Service Grant is at the centre of Trudeau's ethics scandal
With paid opportunities across some sectors going unfilled, what was the point of the program at the heart of Trudeau's ethical scandal?
With many summer jobs already going unfilled, particularly in the agricultural sector, why do we even need a Canada Student Service Grant?

There’s no doubt the non-profit sector has been devastated by Covid-19. Imagine Canada, an organization that helps charities to organize and raise funds, estimates the pandemic’s financial impact is between $9.5 billion and $15.7 billion due to a reduction in donations and revenue from the sale of goods and services, worsened by the inability to hold fundraising events. (WE Charity is a member of Imagine Canada but did not complete the organization’s Standards accreditation process, unlike some 200 other members.) 

Many charities are facing existential crises and the casualties have already been severe, with an astounding one out of every five Imagine Canada members having suspended or ceased operations. The sector, which employs 2.4 million people, provides services that form a vital element of every community’s social support fabric. The non-profit sector desperately needs help. But after being forced to lay-off thousands of employees, the last thing needed are volunteers to carry out programs the charities don’t have money to fund. Dispersing that $913 million directly among hundreds of needy and qualified charities would have been a great help.

But sadly, Ottawa decided not to do that. Now, despite Trudeau’s previous statement that WE Charity is the only organization capable of administering the Canada Student Service Grant, the job of wasting that $913 million has been handed to the public service. And the scrapping over the spoils has already begun, with the Canadian Federation of Students recently launching a petition to have the funds added to the Canada Emergency Student Benefit.

The $913 million set aside for the Canada Student Service Grant program would be better spent offering direct aid to the hard-hit volunteer sector.

It seems obvious that Trudeau’s rationalization for the Canada Student Service Grant is preposterous. So what could have motivated him to implement the program in the first place? Answering that question leads to a more diabolical reason than just handing a huge plum job to his financially strapped friends, the brothers Craig and Marc Kielburger.

At the end of June, after having handed out some $170 billion in Covid-19 support programs over the previous three months, Trudeau ended his daily Rideau Cottage press briefings. That largesse, together with his mantras of, “We’ll get through this together” and “We’re here to help”, had lifted the Liberals well above the Conservatives in the polls. That even raised the prospect of a snap fall election, reinforced when Trudeau’s daily media shows shifted from Rideau Cottage to campaign-style events at the workplaces of what he called “Canadian business champions”.

The Liberals won the 2019 election despite losing the popular vote, largely due to the advantageously distributed support of the traditionally left-of-center youth demographic. Exceptional intelligence is not considered one of Trudeau’s leading characteristics, but his populist acumen together with a dramatic and, ostensibly, sincere communications style brought him to power. What better way to reinforce the chances of regaining his coveted Liberal majority than to engage those many hundreds of thousands of hyped-up youth voters who have attended WE Charity events?

Why risk a political scandal? WE Charity founders Marc and Craig Kielburger (left and right, respectively) offer direct access to an ample and enticing supply of young, left-of-centre, potential Liberal voters.

But if this form of vote-buying was Trudeau’s real objective, how did he possibly expect to get away with it? The answer to that question is captured in the ancient Greek concept of hubris. To the Greeks, hubris referred to “pride and over-confidence so great that it offends the gods by overstepping the boundaries of human limitations in an attempt to assume god-like status”. Hubris was a character flaw seen in the heroes of Classical Greek tragedy, including Oedipus and Achilles. The old adage, Pride goeth before a fall, came to describe the inevitably catastrophic consequences of hubris. 

In retrospect, those months of appearing daily in front of Rideau Cottage playing the sincere, empathetic, cash-gushing saviour freed from the tedious boundaries of parliamentary democracy might have led to fantasizing about the achievement of god-like status. It will be up us mere humans to judge his ethical worthiness. One such mortal is the federal Ethics Commissioner, who will now launch his office’s third probe of our prime minister’s conduct in office.

Gwyn Morgan is the retired founding CEO of Encana Corp.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

It's time for an open, rational debate on immigration policy in Canada.

Can Canada Handle a Rational, Polite and Fact-Based Debate About Immigration?

It seems as if a new taboo is foisted upon Canadians by the week. Immigration is already among our established taboos – while the limits on its remaining areas of policy discussion grow ever-tighter. Canadians as a whole want less of it, while our elites are convinced that only good can come from more of it – and that increasing our diversity of origin is so important that it shall require uniformity of thought. Academic economist and former Parliamentarian Herbert Grubel says nuts to that, offering his take on key elements of immigration policy, plus the facts to support it. Part I of a two-part analysis.

It's a gross example of government overreach for there to be policies directing the diet and exercise of the population.

The Right To Be Fat: Pushing Back Against Government Overreach

Would beloved comic actor John Candy have lived longer if government forced him to eat less? What about Orson Welles? Or Luciano Pavarotti? Perhaps. Would they have been happier or more successful? We’ll never know the answer to the first, and as to the second, almost certainly not. Candy built his career around a lovable portliness, Welles often played menacing fat men and Pavarotti’s girth helped him belt out arias. A few extra pounds, in other words, offers both advantages and disadvantages − and it should be up to the individual to decide how to balance the scales. As governments ramp up policies designed to put their citizenry on a diet, Matthew Lau sallies forth in defence of eating what you want, and exercising only when you feel the need.

Pictured is Gulliver tied down by the Lilliputians. Illustrating the plight of civil servants under increasing regulation.

Slow Death by Regulation, the Great Public-Sector Disease

When do the words “transparency” and “accountability” mean the opposite of what an untutored citizen might think? Why, when they’re passing the lips of a Canadian civil servant. The federal bureaucracy also seems the one place where the digital revolution made everyone less productive. And while this sounds amusing (if pathetic), the federal bureaucracy’s power and intrusiveness just grow and grow while the freedoms of individuals and voluntary associations shrink and shrink. Former citizenship judge Joe Woodard takes a wry look at these trends and with good humour tracks the deadly serious slide of Canada from a free society in which everything that isn’t specifically forbidden is allowed, into something sadder, darker and more constrained.

More from this author

Stone statue wearing masks during the government lockdown

The Lockdown Contrarians Were Right

The days are at their longest, everything’s blooming, summer is nigh and Canadians are increasingly going about their regular lives. Spirits are lifting. And serious questions are being asked. Like Plato’s cave-dwellers emerging out of the darkness, we are blinking in the dazzling light of our 5 am northern dawns. What just happened? Do the claimed but unprovable benefits of the pandemic response stack up against the staggering quantifiable damage? Could we have done better? Gwyn Morgan takes a clear-headed look at these questions and prescribes some principles to dig our way out and avoid a needless repeat.

Canada Needs its Oil and Natural Gas Industry More than Ever

You don’t see news media reporting that Germany has declared Audi and BMW to be obsolete companies from yesteryear. Nor that Switzerland has come to regard its banking sector and watchmakers as sunset industries. There’s been no announcement that South Korea is shuttering Samsung. Nor that the Greeks are tearing over hill and dale torching their olive and orange groves. Everywhere you look, countries are leaning on their proven economic strengths to power their post-Covid comeback. So why is Canada’s federal government, seemingly alone in the world, intent on euthanizing this nation’s number-one source of export earnings and inter-regional tax transfers – the oil and natural gas sector? Gwyn Morgan moves briskly through the recent madness and declares that this is one instance of ideological folly the country simply can’t afford.

The Private Sector Must Get a Larger Role in Canadian Health Care

Canada has so far ducked the extreme growth in the Covid-19 hospitalization and mortality rates afflicting some other countries. The worst is certainly still to come, however – and when it does, the shortfall in Canada’s health care capacity will be laid bare. The vulnerability was largely avoidable, points out Gwyn Morgan, if Canada like nearly all other countries had only allowed private health care delivery alongside its public system. When the nation comes out the other side of the pandemic, Morgan writes, a health care policy reckoning will be long overdue.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

* indicates required
Interests
By providing your email you consent to receive news and updates from C2C Journal. You may unsubscribe at any time.