Does Cortés’ Conquest of Mexico Require an Apology, Or a Thank-You?

Peter Shawn Taylor
May 7, 2019
Official regret – often delivered with a perfectly moistened eye and quavering voice – has been expressed by our prime minister for a seemingly endless parade of old injustices. Native schoolchildren, gays and lesbians, Sikh immigrants, Jewish refugees, six British Columbia chiefs hanged following the Chilcotin War and Inuit populations suffering from tuberculosis have all received a mea culpa from Ottawa. But does such federal self-abasement correspond to what actually happened? Peter Shawn Taylor casts a gimlet eye at Mexico’s efforts to blame 16th century Spain for present-day complaints and finds that the truth sometimes comes down on the side of colonialism.

Does Cortés’ Conquest of Mexico Require an Apology, Or a Thank-You?

Peter Shawn Taylor
May 7, 2019
Official regret – often delivered with a perfectly moistened eye and quavering voice – has been expressed by our prime minister for a seemingly endless parade of old injustices. Native schoolchildren, gays and lesbians, Sikh immigrants, Jewish refugees, six British Columbia chiefs hanged following the Chilcotin War and Inuit populations suffering from tuberculosis have all received a mea culpa from Ottawa. But does such federal self-abasement correspond to what actually happened? Peter Shawn Taylor casts a gimlet eye at Mexico’s efforts to blame 16th century Spain for present-day complaints and finds that the truth sometimes comes down on the side of colonialism.
Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter

In March, Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador demanded Spain and the Vatican apologize to his country’s natives for centuries of colonialism and conquest. “I have sent a letter to the Spanish King and another letter to the Pope so that abuses can be acknowledged and an apology made to the indigenous peoples for the violations of what we now call human rights,” Obrador announced. “The so-called conquest was done with the sword and the cross. They raised churches on top of temples.” With Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés first landing on Mexican soil in the spring of 1519, Obrador’s demand for an apology is one way to mark this momentous quincentenary. Another would be to send a thank-you note.

Contemporary conventional wisdom holds that Cortés was a madman driven by his twin lusts for gold and blood – Neil Young’s 1975 rocker “Cortez the Killer” pretty much summing up modern opinions of the man. A more fulsome view of history and morality reveals a rather more complicated story. For if anyone was fighting on behalf of “what we now call the human rights” of indigenous Mexicans in 1519, it was Cortés.

When he arrived at Vera Cruz 500 years ago, Cortés found himself on the shores of what might be considered history’s most banally evil government. The then-100-year old Aztec empire covered most of central Mexico, comprising somewhere between 5 million and 20 million people spread across hundreds of individual tribes and cities. Ruling over it all was Moctezuma II from his throne in the fabled city of Tenochtitlán.

The President of Mexico, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, demands an apology from Spain and the Vatican for it’s part in the conquest and colonialism of Mexico.

Moctezuma’s Tenochtitlán, a city of about 250,000, was a warrior society wholly dependent on tribute extracted from its client states throughout the country on pain of military violence. His authority was indivisible from the Aztec state religion that required homage paid to a variety of cruel and demanding gods. Without daily offerings of hearts ripped live from human sacrifices to the god Huitzilopochtli, the Aztec believed their sun would die. To ensure another dawn, four priests atop a temple would hold their victim face-up over a stone block while a fifth used a flint knife to pluck out the still-beating heart, which would then be burned on a brazier. The head would then be cut off and kept as a trophy while the rest of the body was tossed down the temple’s steep steps to be ritualistically eaten by members of the upper class.

Other religious events were similarly horrific. Those honouring rain god Tlaloc required wetting the ground with human tears prior to performing human sacrifices, preferably of young children. When tears were not forthcoming, priests would tear out the children’s fingernails to induce crying. Slavery was ubiquitous in Aztec society, driving much of the economy and foreign relations and, among many cruel fates, slaves could be sacrificed and eaten.

The vast supply of victims required for these grim offerings came from tribes under Tenochtitlán’s thumb, either as taxes rendered or prisoners taken from regions that resisted Aztec control. The capital city’s annual butcher’s bill ran to an estimated 4,000 men, women and children; other regions had their own regular requirements. Special occasions required slaughter on a far grander scale. During the coronation of Moctezuma’s predecessor, an estimated 80,000 lives were consumed in four days of unprecedented ritual murder and cannibalism, with the lineup of victims stretching as far as the eye could see.

When Cortés and his men arrived in Tenochtitlán, they reported seeing racks holding tens of thousands of skulls of sacrificial victims on public display. Such claims were once dismissed as colonial-era exaggeration, but recent archaeological evidence now backs their case. To this day, in fact, the most authoritative description of the vast scale and intricacies of Aztec sacrifice can be found in the writings of Franciscan Friar Bernardino de Sahagún, who arrived in Mexico in 1529 and spent nearly 50 years recording Aztec history, culture and religious practices. While broadly sympathetic to the native community and its fate, de Sahagún’s detailed reports on the requirements of their bloody calendar are as shocking today as they were to 16th century readers.

Tenochtitlán, located in the heart of what is now Mexico City, was the largest city and capital of the Aztec Empire.

“Aztec society involved a level of slaughter that has probably never been equalled prior to the advent of mechanized means,” observes historian Justin Lyons, author of a recent book comparing Alexander the Great with Cortés. “The death toll was beyond count.” While the world has been grim witness to many efficiently murderous regimes throughout history (the various waves of Eurasian Steppe peoples, including Genghis Khan’s Mongols and Tamerlane’s Muslim horde, deserve special mention here), the Aztec empire’s fixation on systematically devouring its own constituent population remains a terrible and thankfully rare outlier.  

It was into this world – rather than the indolent paradise Neil Young and others have sought to evoke – that Cortés and his small band of adventurers strode in 1519. While the promise of gold and glory were the undisputed engines of their mission, the conquistadors were utterly appalled by the official slaughter they uncovered. And they went to great lengths to put an end to it. “Cortés was sincerely opposed to human sacrifice, both for personal reasons and due to his religious creed,” Lyons pointed out in an interview. “As a result he destroyed temples and forbade sacrificial ceremonies wherever he went.”

Archeologists unearthed a tower of sacrificial human skulls near Templo Mayor, one of the main temples in the Aztec capital Tenochtitlán, as mentioned by Andres de Tapia, a Spanish soldier who accompanied Cortés in the 1521 conquest of Mexico.
Archeologists unearthed a tower of sacrificial human skulls near Templo Mayor, one of the main temples in the Aztec capital Tenochtitlán, as mentioned by Andres de Tapia, a Spanish soldier who accompanied Cortés in the 1521 conquest of Mexico.

The conquest of Mexico depended heavily on Cortés’ alliance with restive tribes eager to overthrow Tenochtitlán’s hegemony. Yet Cortés repeatedly angered his allies by tearing down their altars and interrupting their religious practices. When Obrador talks of churches being raised on the tops of temples, this was how Cortés sought to halt the ritualized massacre of a powerless Mexican native population.

A lesser and greedier man might have simply allowed the slaughter to continue as he filled his coffers with gold and other booty. Instead Cortés put his goals and his life at serious risk by imposing Christian standards of behaviour on the world he conquered. And while it’s now popular to shrug away Aztec religious practices by casually equating them with the Spanish Inquisition or similar European habits, such a comparison is absurd. The primary focus of Aztec governance was to habitually consume its own and subject peoples by grotesque means. Despite its many flaws, Renaissance Europe was never so murderous or single-minded. Putting an end to the Aztec horrors was a blow struck for all humanity.

Now Obrador wants an apology for that. That’s not only ahistorical, it was the Church that formed the most potent opposition to the worst aspects of the colonialization of New Spain. Sahagún and other Catholic thinkers spoke out passionately against the enslavement of native Mexicans and in favour of their recognition and treatment as equals to their Spanish brethren. By this standard, the Pope has the least to apologize for.

Tsilhqo’tin Nation Chiefs stand on the steps of Parliament in Ottawa in 2018 as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issues a formal apology and exonerates the Nation’s 1884 war chiefs.

Of course this need for balance and context when declaring historical figures or peoples to be either heroes or villains applies not just to Mexican colonialism. Every one of the many apologies delivered by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on behalf of the Canadian government and its predecessors regarding native schooling, refugee policies, human rights and other colonial-era actions and inactions is built on the same base of partial-truths and historical blindness that motivates Obrador’s demands of Spain and the Vatican. The whole truth is always more complex and often more exculpatory than whatever version politicians may prefer for their own present-day purposes.

Certainly an honest retelling of Cortés’ story requires including the recognition that he killed a great many people during his devastating assault on Tenochtitlán in 1521. And smallpox, inadvertently spread by later additions to his party, resulted in an even greater loss of life in Mexico and throughout both continents. The tragedies associated with European colonization of the Americas by Cortés and those who followed him should never be forgotten. But if the most basic of human rights is protection from arbitrary murder by a malign authority – one’s own rulers, in fact – then surely Cortés deserves recognition as this continent’s first great defender of those rights. And perhaps, on the 500th anniversary of his arrival, a brief note of thanks.

Peter Shawn Taylor is a contributing editor at Maclean’s magazine. He lives in Waterloo, Ontario.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

The Private Sector Must Get a Larger Role in Canadian Health Care

Canada has so far ducked the extreme growth in the Covid-19 hospitalization and mortality rates afflicting some other countries. The worst is certainly still to come, however – and when it does, the shortfall in Canada’s health care capacity will be laid bare. The vulnerability was largely avoidable, points out Gwyn Morgan, if Canada like nearly all other countries had only allowed private health care delivery alongside its public system. When the nation comes out the other side of the pandemic, Morgan writes, a health care policy reckoning will be long overdue.

Future of Conservatism Series, Part V: Could Canada Handle a Trumpian Populist?

Democratic politics must continue even in times of war. Despite suspension of the federal Conservative leadership race amidst the coronavirus, members and supporters still need to think about how to shape their party and pick the right leader to best meet the many challenges of our era. C2C Journal has looked at revived Red Toryism, at uncompromisingly principled conservatism and at the decidedly compromised but successful Harper way. We have sought insight from abroad. And now we turn to populism. Barry Cooper applies his usual fearless thinking and cheerful bluntness to evaluate whether the Canadian political landscape has become hospitable terrain to a Canadian Trump.

Want More Affordable Housing in Canada? Build More Houses

Solving Canada’s housing crisis shouldn’t require more than a single lesson in economics. When prices are high, a free market always responds and supplies more. Yet amidst Canada’s severe problems of housing affordability, this foolproof mechanism is continually frustrated by governments that are either ignorant of how markets work, fixated on preserving the status quo or display naked contempt for the profit motive. Peter Shawn Taylor looks at the scorn heaped on land developers, landlords and the rest of the housing supply industry and wonders how they became the villains of this story.

Thinking Clearly in a Time of Panic

How should the conservative mind respond to the coronavirus pandemic? Panic and despair are in ample supply, and the urge to succumb appears widespread. Others have steered, via deliberate ignorance, to fatalism, though the walls are closing in on such rebels. Both extremes are beneath thoughtful conservatives. C2C Editor-in-Chief George Koch counsels that however dark today might appear, the eternal search for objective truth – the foundation for all conservative thought – is the first necessary step along the path to seeing humankind through to brighter days.

Future of Conservatism Series Part IV: Rallying the World’s Centre-Right Parties

As Canada’s Conservatives evaluate leadership hopefuls and ponder what their party is about and which path might lead to electoral victory, it’s easy to ignore international politics. They should take a look, for the world holds dozens of established centre-right democratic parties, and many are tackling challenges of relevance and adaptation at least as steep as those burdening Canada’s Conservatives. John Weissenberger travelled to Washington, D.C. for the annual conference of the International Democrat Union (IDU) and provides his assessment in this essay. Later this year, once international travel is restored, Weissenberger heads to Vienna to deepen his understanding at the IDU’s 2020 Forum.

Averting “Climate Poverty” for Canada’s Middle Class

Pursuing grandiose visions tends to cloud judgment, and when the vision is saving our very planet from an apprehended climate crisis, it’s little surprise that numbers are fudged, logic is twisted, the hardest-hit are ignored and entire social classes are cast into the trash. Matthew Lau, however, refuses to be dazzled by dreams. In this article, Lau remains rooted in reality and fixed on crunching the numbers to come up with some arresting conclusions about the huge costs of government climate policies to working people here and now, set against marginal if not ephemeral benefits to come over the next 80 years.

Share This Story

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on print

Donate

Subscribe to the C2C Weekly
It's Free!

By clicking SUBSCRIBE, you agree to receive emails from C2C Journal. You can unsubscribe at any time.