Stories

The cursing generation

Mark Milke
April 18, 2012
Several millennia ago, Aristotle asserted that man was different from the animals because only he had the gift of (thoughtful) speech. The cursing generation seems intent on erasing that distinction as Mark Milke explains…
Stories

The cursing generation

Mark Milke
April 18, 2012
Several millennia ago, Aristotle asserted that man was different from the animals because only he had the gift of (thoughtful) speech. The cursing generation seems intent on erasing that distinction as Mark Milke explains…
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

Several millennia ago, Aristotle asserted that man was different from the animals because only he had the gift of (thoughtful) speech. The cursing generation seems intent on erasing that distinction. The blanketing of everyday conversation with curse words and crudities is so common that few people stop to question it, or tell people to zip it.

The relentless torrent of swear words, used as if they were punctuation marks in a sentence, was again made real to me recently courtesy of two unrelated episodes.

Episode one brought three youngish women along my path while I was nearing the University of Calgary’s library. “This bi**h needs to eat” exclaimed one gal—about herself—loudly. 

The second reminder took place as I was stuck on a chairlift at Lake Louise ski resort. Some young man behind me cursed three times in five minutes. He repeatedly urged the motionless mechanical object to “‘effing’ move!” It eventually did, perhaps reinforcing a correlation-causation error in his mind: “I curse, the object moves; therefore my cursing was cause to the effect.”

A few years back, a political operative who shall remain nameless but was known for his drinking and colourful language was a fellow patron at a small Italian restaurant, converted from a house to its current use. So the four of us were at a table in a small room; a family with young kids and a couple lingering over a romantic dinner sat at two other tables.

The more my fellow dinner companion drank, the bluer his language became; he was oblivious to the frequent dark stares from the family and irritated glances from the couple.

Finally—being embarrassed for us but especially sorry for the other patrons with children, I blurted out with some frustration, “Would you please shut up already?! There are other people here and with kids.” He looked around with the then-dawning wakefulness that perhaps the wine had masked his own self-awareness. He mumbled his regrets.  

The swearing virus is not limited to undergraduates, frustrated skiers and politicos. Historian Niall Ferguson prints the F-word (as an action) in his recent book, Civilization. While he is quoting someone else, past historians would have put part of that word in asterisks.

I won’t claim I never swear. I do try and limit it to private, consenting episodes between me and my slow computer (and I realize it won’t help but everyone needs to be occasionally irrational).

Still, to curse is to admit that one has become lazy; that the effort to find the right words and to engage in the act of reason has been abandoned.

Maybe that’s why swearing most often takes place when people are frustrated or angry. Insofar as the curses are directed at others, it’s an attempt to skip past reason and enter the realm of intimidation, just with harsh words instead of fists. 

But that’s not much different from the animal world. As Aristotle also pointed out, once you abandon the act of speech with logic and thought behind it, all you’re left with is mere voice and its primal grunts.

–

Mark Milke is the editorial board chair of C2C Journal.

Love C2C Journal? Here's how you can help us grow.

More for you

From Refuge to Hunting Ground: Why Some Migrant Men Come Here to Rape, and What to Do About It

Among the many true things that cannot be said out loud in our era of wokist orthodoxy is that some recent immigrants might be fundamentally different from other Canadians. It’s a taboo that must end if Canada is to avoid repeating the vast wave of sex crimes sweeping across much of Europe. In the concluding instalment of her searing two-part series, Margret Kopala examines the underlying factors behind the horrifying propensity of some recent male migrants to brutalize and sexually assault women in their new country. While many politicians have chosen to turn a blind eye to the problem, Kopala reveals how a popular pushback is finally forcing some Western governments to secure their borders and protect their people. (Read Part I here.)

Monsters Among Us: The Unspoken Link Between Immigration Policy and Sexual Assaults

Not long after the horrific October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, Margret Kopala was walking down an Ottawa street when she was verbally assaulted by a man of obvious Middle Eastern heritage making ugly references about her sex. Drawing a line between her harrowing experience and Canada’s lax immigration policy and law enforcement practices, and drawing upon ample evidence from Europe and the UK, Kopala explores the terrifying correlation between recurring waves of young male migrants and shocking increases in violent crime – especially sexual assault. The implications are both personal and societal. Part I of a two-part series.

Endgame to Failure: How the Zero-Tolerance Campaign Against Nicotine Will Backfire

About 11 percent of Canadians currently smoke. Cutting that rate in half by 2035 would offer an enormous health dividend. But how to get there? The influential Ontario Tobacco Research Unit recently offered the federal government its advice: crack down not just on cigarettes but all forms of nicotine use, including vapes, oral pouches and heated tobacco products. But as Ian Irvine points out, such a puritanical approach will worsen overall health, increase crime and reduce social equity. Surveying the international evidence and drawing upon his own academic research, Irvine reveals a better path forward.

More from this author

Not So Beautiful Minds: Conspiracy Theories from JFK to Oliver Stone and Donald Trump

Shocking events that plunge a country into chaos or destroy a beloved leader are hard for anyone to process. The evil done is so towering it bends the human psyche to accept that the evildoer is utterly banal, a loner walking in ordinary shoes. The cause simply must befit the outcome; thus can a conspiracy theory be hatched. At other times, the cold hope of political or financial gain or simple mischief might be the source. There certainly is no shortage of conspiracy theories. Mark Milke revisits one of history’s most famous political assassinations and the conspiracy theories it spawned to illuminate the ongoing danger this toxic tendency poses to us all.

Picture of Thomas Hobbes frontispiece of Leviathan. A renowned pieceof political work on liberty

Future of Conservatism Series, Part VII: Memo to Politicians: We’re Not Your Pet Projects

Canadian conservatives have most of the summer to ruminate on what they want their federal party to become – as embodied by their soon-to-be elected leader, anyway. Acceptability, likability and winnability will be key criteria. Above all, however, should be crafting and advancing a compelling policy alternative to today’s managerial liberalism, which has been inflated by the pandemic almost beyond recognition. Mark Milke offers a forceful rebuttal against the Conservative “alternative” comprising little more than a massaged form of top-down management.

Leaders_debate_2019_canada_diversity_bias_free_speech_liberal_conservative

So Much for Diversity: The Monochromatic Moderators of Monday’s Debate

Canada is a big, diverse country by virtually any measure, from our no-longer-so-sparse population to our epic geography to the ethnic makeup of our people. Diverse in every way, it seems, except in our elites’ aggressively progressive official-think. Consistent with this is the otherwise bizarre decision to have Monday’s federal leaders’ debate hosted by five decidedly similar female journalists. Mark Milke briefly profiles the five and, more important, advances a positive alternative: five distinguished women diverse in background, hometown and, above all, thought.